Hi,
You can report a bug about this at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-webcatalog/+filebug
There is some upcoming design work, so this can be considered as part
of those changes.
Thanks,
James
On Sun, 06 Nov 2011 18:32:31 -0500, "Jonathan Carter (highvoltage)"
wrote:
> Howdy!
>
> I wa
Hi,
This change will likely affect some people in Ubuntu.
We may want to make the change for Ubuntu itself, but first we should
make sure that all our systems pulling from Debian still work.
Thanks,
James
--- Begin Message ---
Hello world,
I don't know if I really got everyone who should hav
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 00:00:13 +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 27.07.2011, 17:39 -0400 schrieb Stéphane Graber:
> > NOTE: Is the report still updating? I seem to remember it updating every
> > 30 minutes or so, but last update was more than 10 hours ago...
>
> It should be updated e
On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 17:12:29 +0200, Didier Roche wrote:
> https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/oneiric/opendrim-lmp-powermanagement/oneiric-201107070710/+merge/67122
> -> the patch and content is in the source package. The thing is, as it
> was the first patch, the debian/patches di
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:32:18 -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> * The package importer is barfing on python-oauth, so there's no Debian source
> branch available.
Try again now.
Thanks,
James
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://li
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:52:17 -0400, "Francis J. Lacoste"
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When user file bugs on the distribution and enter a package name in the
> widget, Launchpad automatically adds a line to the description with
> Binary package hint: binarypackagename
>
> That binarypackagename actually
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:50:30 -0700, Allison Randal
wrote:
> - What should we cut from the current DVD image (currently a superset of
> desktop, alternate, and server)? Or, perhaps more simply, what would be
> worth adding beyond the current 700MB CD image?
Does the DVD install extra stuff than t
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 13:59:08 -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> No objections from me, although James has better insights into how
> people are utilizing packaging branches in Ubuntu. James?
I don't see a problem with this approach.
Will you just consider official branches in the development focus
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:54:38 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Friday, June 03, 2011 11:18:34 AM Barry Warsaw wrote:
> > On Jun 03, 2011, at 10:54 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > >I'm not sure how complete the current draft is relative to the planned
> > >content coverage but so far it lacks a lot
On Wed, 4 May 2011 14:27:18 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> == Auto-importer changes (bzr history only) ==
>
> These happen when the source package as uploaded doesn't quite match the
> branch (often things like differences in an autogenerated
> debian/control), or when the branch wasn't properly ta
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011 13:56:19 -0800, Steve Langasek
wrote:
> Maybe 'bzr debrelease', to avoid polluting the namespace too much?
>
> This should be implemented on top of 'dch' and support the -D option to
> specify an upload target; we definitely shouldn't have bzr-builddeb encoding
> its own notio
On Wed, 2 Mar 2011 11:37:06 -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> I've spent a couple of days on and off chasing an annoying bug in Claws Mail:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/claws-mail/+bug/724416
>
> I've got a hint of a fix from upstream[1], which I'm trying to build and test,
> but unf
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 16:17:50 +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> It seems like 'mark-uploaded' is causing a certain amount of friction
> at the moment: cases where it's not run and the branch therefore gets
> out of sync with the upload, and also just that it's an additional
> step that weighs people down
Hi Rob,
One thing that isn't clear from your mail is if all substring matching
on package names is out.
For instance would searching for "gcc" get you results from "gcc-4.4"
and "gcc-4.5"?
Thanks,
James
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 19:09:24 +1300, Robert Collins
wrote:
> Hi, as you may have noticed, b
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 23:17:13 +, Phil Bull wrote:
> There's been a little discussion of this on anjuta-devel-list [1] over
> the past couple of days. I'm not really sure what sort of questions you
> have about IDE integration; what do you need to know?
Interesting, thanks.
The steps that Joha
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 17:12:06 +, Phil Bull wrote:
> That sounds excellent! I've emailed the gnome-devtools list about it
> [1]. Hopefully, we can get a few people together to work on getting this
> (or something similar) supported in GNOME development tools like Anjuta.
Hi Phil,
Thanks for do
Hi,
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 09:35:38 -0800, Rick Spencer
wrote:
> The idea is that you can easily replace the "ubuntu-application" part
> with whatever you want. For example, you could fork the
> ubuntu-application template to make fedora-application. You could change
> the preferences to use someth
17 matches
Mail list logo
