Hello,
what is the correct setup and invocation of live-build in order to
replicate the builds of the current Ubuntu phone images for armhf as
published on cdimage.ubuntu.com ?
Is there something as straightforward as for the desktop-build as
described here?
Thanks Kevin,
sorry for not being more specific in my email. I meant the Ubuntu
userland .zip not the Android bits.
On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 08:26:39 -0600, Kevin Gunn wrote:
Hi Jani - I was able to use these instructions a several weeks back, I
assume they're still accurate.
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:22:58 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hello,
[snip]
That's certainly true, but I think this is something that the DMB has a
duty to correct. Frankly, I think there's no reason that Adam and Björn
couldn't have been ready for upload rights by January, *if* the DMB's
I
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 09:06:31 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Thursday, January 31, 2013 09:23:39 AM Jani Monoses wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:22:58 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hello,
[snip]
That's certainly true, but I think this is something that the DMB has
a duty to correct
On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 19:22:46 +, Jani Monoses wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 17:00:00 +0100, Oliver Grawert wrote:
hi,
i just uploaded http://paste.ubuntu.com/1555763/ which should do for
now, it would be great if someone could re-implement /usr/bin/acceld in
actual C .. polling like
Hello,
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 21:06:41 +0100, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
We recently did a smem memory snapshot from raring, running on a nexus
tablet. The results have been recorded on the wiki:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Nexus7/Smem-2013-01-16
At least some of the items have notes indicating
On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 17:00:00 +0100, Oliver Grawert wrote:
hi,
i just uploaded http://paste.ubuntu.com/1555763/ which should do for
now, it would be great if someone could re-implement /usr/bin/acceld in
actual C .. polling like that from a shell script adds some CPU overhead
that we could
I was not scheduled today but since last time I only got around to
sponsor two packages I did a few more now:
* Sponsored 5 uploads for Linaro devs to make some packages cross-build
and used for bootstrapping Ubuntu:
gawk, noweb, libbsd,texinfo, klibc
* debsign --debs-dir is broken due to
[1] If your primary focus is main, you may be tempted to say oh, they're
in universe, so they don't matter very much.
Firstly, the noise causes a problem in itself; many Launchpad bug
views don't make it particularly easy to see what component bugs
affect, and we often have
Hello,
Is each package diff accessible from the corresponding Ubuntu package
source page?
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/oneiric/+uniquepackages
This has over 3000 entries, many of which are not actually in sid but
pending approval? Do those not yet meet criteria for inclusion?
For ex:
On 08/16/2011 07:19 PM, Julian Edwards wrote:
On Tuesday 16 August 2011 09:30:43 Jani Monoses wrote:
Hello,
Is each package diff accessible from the corresponding Ubuntu package
source page?
No, you need to go to the pages I mentioned.
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/oneiric/+uniquepackages
On 07/07/2011 12:46 PM, Daniel Holbach wrote:
Hello Bryce,
Am 06.07.2011 21:12, schrieb Bryce Harrington:
I like the idea very much. With the Packaging Training classes [1] we
are always looking for people who are willing to talk 10-15 minutes
about a topic and answer just a few questions about
Hello,
I received quite a few helpful suggestions about how one could partially
solve the problem I describe below so I am more confused than if there
were only one way to do it :)
For an ARM blueprint [1] concerning updating boot firmware on certain
boards, one of the requirements is to
On 11/19/2010 02:10 AM, Alex Launi wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Dustin Kirkland kirkl...@ubuntu.com
mailto:kirkl...@ubuntu.com wrote:
I thought a good 2D experience was also one of the key objectives?
Yeah, but the good 2D experience is really just a fall back to Gnome 2.X
14 matches
Mail list logo
