On 2013-02-14 09:12:16 -0800, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> On 2/13/13 10:43 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> >Scott Ritchie [2013-02-13 22:35 -0800]:
> >>We have (and will continue to have) many transitional dummy packages
> >>with no content. I see two main advantages to flagging them:
> >>
> >>1) Lintian coul
On 2012-08-09 09:48:58 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le 08/08/2012 22:41, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> >I don't think this should be synced without doing a full test rebuild of the
> >archive (main+universe) using the new version.
> Who can do archive rebuilds on ppas (I guess there is an easy way
== Attendees ==
* Chair: Michael Bienia
* Present: Benjamin Drung, Micah Gersten, Stefano Rivera, Stéphane Graber
== Notes ==
* Action review
* Iain Lane to document package set application process
→ done
* Micah Gersten to ping all packageset teams to get a description we
On 2011-10-06 12:04:11 -0400, Luke Faraone wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 10:25, Stephen M. Webb wrote:
> >
> > Ubuntu Member: a recognized member of the Ubuntu community
> >
> > Ubuntu Developer: a Ubuntu Member who obtained their recognition through
> > contributing software development (patche
On 2011-08-16 21:40:04 +0300, Jani Monoses wrote:
> On 08/16/2011 07:19 PM, Julian Edwards wrote:
> >On Tuesday 16 August 2011 09:30:43 Jani Monoses wrote:
>
> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/oneiric/+missingpackages
>
> >>pending approval? Do those not yet meet criteria for inclusion?
> >>
> >>For
On 2011-08-04 15:42:38 -0400, Jonathan Carter wrote:
> On 04/08/11 02:13 PM, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
> > To (1), there's been discussion on the list about adjusting meeting
> > times to improve quorum. That would be a huge win for everyone.
> > Woohoo. \o/
>
> Yep, timing seems to be an issue in
On 2011-08-03 12:23:13 -0700, Chase Douglas wrote:
> On 08/03/2011 12:14 PM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> > The only time I've seen the application be done *completely* in email
> > was when there was a 9-person-ish queue.
>
> Ok, that's evidence of what's been done in the past, but what is the
> pol
On 2011-08-02 11:50:52 -0700, Chase Douglas wrote:
> On 07/29/2011 11:24 AM, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
> > Hola,
> >
> > On Fri, July 29, 2011 11:01 am, Michael Bienia wrote:
> >> This leads to the next question: how much do you trust the person
> >> writing
On 2011-07-27 12:55:08 -0700, Chase Douglas wrote:
> Imo, What we should be looking for is two-fold:
>
> Packaging:
> 1. Has the applicant properly worked on packages in the past?
> 2. Is the applicant aware of the limits of their packaging competency?
> 3. Does the applicant seek out guidance whe
On 2011-07-26 15:53:09 -0500, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Iain Lane wrote:
> > By the way, I am disturbed at the amount of implied criticism the DMB is
> > receiving in the past couple of weeks. Is it a coincidence that it comes
> > shortly after we defer some applica
On 2011-07-25 16:11:43 +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 05:01:35PM +0200, Daniel Holbach wrote:
> > I agree that the name is misleading and it's unfortunate that it
> > confuses applicants. It'd be good to change it something sensible. Even
> > if we just change it in the documenta
On 2011-07-25 22:58:10 -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On 25 July 2011 07:45, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > I would recommend people to apply for 'Ubuntu Contributing Developer'
> > before applying for MOTU or core-dev.
>
> I disagree with your recommendation. I recently got my Ubuntu
> membership throu
On 2011-07-25 07:51:17 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I think it's a fair point that UCD is confusing. What it means is "Ubuntu
> member that got their membership based on development contribution and not
> some other kind". Do we really need a different name for this? It might be
> more cle
On 2011-07-25 14:48:38 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
> On 07/25/2011 02:05 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > Package set members having exclusive lock on packages is something that has
> > been discussed, but AIUI (except for packagesets corresponding to Main)
> > there
> > are no such restrictive pa
Developer Membership Board meeting 2011-02-28 19:00 UTC
===
Chair: Michael Bienia
Present: Benjamin Drung, Mackenzie Morgan, Stéphane Graber,
Cody Somerville (only half of the meeting)
Absent: Emmet Hikory, Iain Lane
== Action review
of the vote is¹:
Emmet Hikory (persia)
Michael Bienia (geser)
Stéphane Graber (stgraber)
Iain Lane (Laney)
Makenzie Morgan (maco)
Cody Somerville (cody_somerville)
The current Developer Membership Board members are²:
Benjamin Drung (bdrung)
Emmet Hikory (persia)
Michael Bi
Developer Membership Board meeting 2011-01-03 19:00 UTC
===
Chair: Cody Somerville
Present: Benjamin Drung, Soren Hansen, Stéphane Graber, Michael Bienia
Absent: Emmet Hikory, Colin Watson
== Action review ==
* Colin Watson to find a
Hello,
Angel Abad's application for MOTU was approved during the DMB meeting on
2011-01-03 [1]. Please give him a sincere welcome.
Michael
1: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/01/03/%23ubuntu-meeting.html#t19:29
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubs
Hello,
since a few days the FTBFS overview page at
http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/
contains now information about packagesets too.
The 'component' tables got an additional column ('Set?') which contains
a checkmark if the package belongs to at least one packageset. A tooltip
shows which package
On 2010-10-28 16:47:37 -0400, Thierry Carrez wrote:
[ JavaLibraryFreeze ]
Is there a clear definition of which (source) packages fall below it
that would make it easy to check if an exception is needed or not? (for
those who aren't familiar with java).
Something like all source packages producing
On 2010-10-20 10:29:16 +0200, Michael Bienia wrote:
> The Developer Membership Board has started a vote to fill the vacant
> position.
I've contacted by several people about the fact that the ballot mails
are a mix of German and English. I'm sorry about the inconvenience. I
didn&#
21 matches
Mail list logo
