On Mon, 2016-06-06 at 12:58 +0200, Xen wrote:
> Because of that it will be judged according to cases such as:
> - game genie vs nintendo
> - artic vs midway
> - formgen vs micro star
So, firstly, the GPL is a copyright licence, so the conversation has
always been about copyright law. The only
On Thu, 2016-06-02 at 20:39 +0200, Xen wrote:
> > This exactly has happened many times. If you take a proprietary
> > piece
> > of software, make changes and resell it (breaking the license
> > agreement
> > you received it under), then the original authors are perfectly in
> > their rights to
On Thu, 2016-06-02 at 13:54 +0200, Xen wrote:
> Because they never asked for payment or set any conditions for access
> to
> their work.
Yes they did, the GPL is the set of conditions they made for access to
their work.
> If a book is in my hands, a vendor no longer has the ability to
> direct
On Thu, 2016-06-02 at 14:35 +0200, Xen wrote:
> The intention of the GPL is not really relevant.
>
> What happens is that the authors remain to have a say about how the
> product is used, if copyright is at play (at least the idea of
> copyright).
Yes, and the authors stated they require you
On Thu, 2016-06-02 at 12:31 +0200, Xen wrote:
> > So I think the unfairness is very much there now. Spengler is now
> > actually getting something for nothing, where before he was not,
> > and
> > the whole intention of many of the contributors to linux has been
> > subverted.
> Untrue. There was
As somebody previously mentioned the first time you posted this, I'm
not sure why this is relevant to Ubuntu development?
Perhaps you should get in touch with the Software Freedom Conservancy,
and see if there is anything they can do. https://sfconservancy.org/
On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 03:12 +,
On Sun, 2015-07-12 at 15:51 +0200, Johan Kriel wrote:
Please guys, seriously consider the implementation of shortcuts as used
by Windows in Ubuntu. Those shortcuts are of real good use and they
don't create unnecessary extra symbolic paths to any folder. They are a
simple direct jump to
On Sun, 2015-07-12 at 15:51 +0200, Johan Kriel wrote:
Please guys, seriously consider the implementation of shortcuts as used
by Windows in Ubuntu. Those shortcuts are of real good use and they
don't create unnecessary extra symbolic paths to any folder. They are a
simple direct jump to
On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 15:44 +, Patrick Bowen wrote:
It becomes annoying if you are repeatedly having to do this...
Would it be possible and feasible to suppress this behaviour?
System Settings - Details
One of the sections there allows you to set what to do when a device is
inserted, I just
On ĵaŭ, 2015-04-30 at 00:04 -0400, John Moser wrote:
Caveat: the alt-tab behavior is functionally useless; I believe it may
be an abandoned feature, because it never gets fixed and behaves in
entirely unjustifiable ways.
The designers have thought about it. I don't necessarily agree with
On mer, 2014-12-17 at 00:17 -0500, Robert Schroll wrote:
Firstly, I don't see anything here that requires an app. All of this
could be done on a website. Once you have a website, you can make a
webapp for Ubuntu very easily.
I would agree with that.
What I would like to see is reporting
On ven, 2014-12-12 at 23:53 +0100, Marcus Pollice wrote:
I'd be grateful if someone could point out the reason for the difference
and also how to compile binaries to achieve the same performance.
I know nothing about openssl in particular, but you may see improvements
simply due to the flags
On mar, 2014-12-16 at 15:31 +, Sam Bull wrote:
On ven, 2014-12-12 at 23:53 +0100, Marcus Pollice wrote:
I'd be grateful if someone could point out the reason for the difference
and also how to compile binaries to achieve the same performance.
Nevermind, I just realised the performance
On lun, 2014-06-02 at 12:50 -0700, Dale Amon wrote:
The don't like much issues:
* Procedure of mouse to top left corner, sweep to far right edge
to select desktop is slow. And the images only show one
screen. Would prefer getting a lower tool bar desktop selector
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 11:59 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
This is not bad packaging but a library which is not yet packaged. The best
thing is to provide a source package packaging this library. So please
package the collada library.
OK, that's a bit clearer. I don't have the time at the
to use Ubuntu to develop games, but it's a bit of a barrier
if we can't export our models for use in the game without needing to
manually install it from the website on everybody's machine.
Thanks,
Sam Bull
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss
16 matches
Mail list logo
