Forwarding to -devel for wider discussion
-- Forwarded message -
From: James Page
Date: Wed, May 12, 2021 at 10:00 AM
Subject: ceph: dropping support for armhf
To: ubuntu-server
Hi -server
Every cycle we go through a bit/lot of pain as new versions of Ceph are
released
Hi SRU Team
I've made/proposed an update to:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/OpenStack/StableReleaseUpdates
For 20.04, OVN is the default/preferred SDN for OpenStack deployments on
Ubuntu; as such we'd like to include it in the SRU process we have for
stable point releases alongside OpenvSwitch.
We
Hi Maciej
On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 2:36 PM Maciej Jozefczyk wrote:
> Hey!
>
> Does the Ubuntu team have any OVS maintainers that could take a look at
> this problem?
> I'm CCing the message from ovs-discuss.
>
> -- Forwarded message -
> From: Gregory Rose
> Date: Mon, Jun 29,
Hi All
Mathias and I where discussing some challenges around fitting the Ceph
build with any level of parallelism in to a virtualized launchpad builder
(as used for the majority of architectures today).
Basically the current memory spec only permits a max-parallel of 2 (on
Xenial amd64). Ceph
Hi All
sqlalchemy 1.0.x has been creating some awkward unit test races in some
OpenStack projects (specifically neutron, and I'm fed up of hitting
rebuild); I've started work on the transition to sqlalchemy 1.1.x for
artful in:
untested.
If you are having issues with the version of libvirt or qemu in 14.04,
I'd recommend you ensure bugs are raises, so the relevant maintainers
get triage and fix if required.
Regards
James
- --
James Page
Ubuntu and Debian Developer
james.p...@ubuntu.com
jamesp...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP
- made comment to this effect and started to peek at the
merge.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/augeas/+bug/1310120
- LGTM - uploaded to utopic and trusty.
Queue at end of period: 43
Cheers
James
- --
James Page
Ubuntu and Debian Developer
james.p...@ubuntu.com
jamesp...@debian.org
first and 12.04.5 after (exact date TBD).
What are other's thoughts here? Does anyone have a compelling
reason for not providing a 12.04.5 point release?
+1 on release and proposal for timing - works well from a server team
perspective!
Cheers
James
- --
James Page
Ubuntu and Debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Folks
On 21/01/14 18:16, James Page wrote:
What do people think to this plan? Are OpenJDK and Tomcat7
important packages for Ubuntu users? Will not having a well
supported OpenJDK implementation in Ubuntu main discourage people
from using
applications? Or do users still just use the
Oracle Java downloads instead and ignore what Ubuntu provides?
Let me know what you think...
Cheers
James
- --
James Page
Ubuntu and Debian Developer
james.p...@ubuntu.com
jamesp...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15
add more value and be more
lightweight to maintain. Have a look at the python-jenkins package -
this provides a nice way to create/run/delete jobs in Jenkins using
the RESTful API.
HTH
Cheers
James
- --
James Page
Ubuntu and Debian Developer
james.p...@ubuntu.com
jamesp...@debian.org
-1194855
- Uploaded
Length at end: 32
--
James Page
Ubuntu Core Developer
Debian Maintainer
james.p...@ubuntu.com
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
). Asked proposer to re-base based on accepted upstream fix and
pointed them at the packaging guide on how to work with branches.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-json-patch/+bug/1185739
Uploaded - and pinged zul about status of Python3 - Debian.
Queue length at end: 43
--
James
, unsubscribed ubuntu-sponsors with an
appropriate message.
- --
James Page
Ubuntu Core Developer
Debian Maintainer
james.p...@ubuntu.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJRUEIkAAoJEL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Any chance this can be fixed up without an upload to change the past?
http://package-import.ubuntu.com/status/drbd8.html#2012-07-09%2005:37:49.954343
Cheers
James
- --
James Page
Ubuntu Core Developer
Debian Maintainer
james.p...@ubuntu.com
-report
- Change to landscape client code; also proposed upstream;
commented that should be accepted upstream first and then
released into Ubuntu. Marked WIP.
- --
James Page
Ubuntu Core Developer
Debian Maintainer
james.p...@ubuntu.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11
-proposed
- Low priority for cross-build issue - queried whether this is
really eligible for SRU, un-subscribed and pointed reporter
at SRU process.
Start: 69
End: 52 (plus uploads pending approval...)
Cheers
James
- --
James Page
Ubuntu Core Developer
Debian Maintainer
james.p...@ubuntu.com
/ubuntu/+bugs?field.tag=java7-bytecode
[4] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JavaTeam/Java7Default
- --
James Page
Ubuntu Core Developer
Debian Maintainer
james.p...@ubuntu.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net
/+source/blktap-dkms/+bug/1028135
- New upstream release for compat with 3.5 kernel - proposed by
upstream themselves which created some confusion as the packaging was
quite different. Worked with Mike on IRC to get the correct release
and uploaded a new version for ubuntu.
EOD
- --
James Page
--
James Page
Ubuntu Core Developer
Debian Maintainer
james.p...@ubuntu.com
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
proposer to submit packaging changes back to Debian.
https://code.launchpad.net/~jfi/ubuntu/quantal/psensor/new-upstream/+merge/114792
- Merge not fully documented - asked proposer to update and
re-submit; marked WIP.
Cheers
James
- --
James Page
Ubuntu Core Developer
Debian Maintainer
james.p
Hi Daniel
On 15/06/12 13:31, Daniel Holbach wrote:
On 15.06.2012 14:08, James Page wrote:
SRU's which have been uploaded but not accepted are hard to
differentiate on the report - they don't require any further
sponsor action so it would be good to be able to filter those
out if possible
://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/foundations-q-java7
[1]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-announce/2012-April/000955.html
[2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.tag=java7-ftbfs
[3] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JavaTeam/Java7Default
- --
James Page
Ubuntu Core Developer
Debian
James
- --
James Page
Ubuntu Core Developer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPunb9AAoJEL/srsug59jDGEkP/icVhIsI1zloAJ1bUB1nIcVK
QbYYs+8jP8qfBjKxYVfBqZwmLusNEVOcb1J
and patch required some further work - queried whether it
might be better to re-sync from Debian which now has version 1.6.
That's me done for today (aside from landing the zentyal packages...)
Cheers
James
- --
James Page
Ubuntu Core Developer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
state of this package was in Debian (bug
reporter appears to have stepped forward as maintainer) as pushing a new
upstream release through that route would be preferable. Marking
in-complete and un-subscribed ubuntu-sponsors until queries/issues with
patch/encoding resolved.
Cheers
James
- --
James
ubuntu-sponsors
James
- --
James Page
Ubuntu Core Developer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJOpqlOAAoJEL/srsug59jDWQcP/RPDQL+rzyASYG1Tlmb4a9Iu
je0gAU8VkDJ
and has missing merge aspect - comment added.
Cheers
James
- --
James Page
Ubuntu Server Developer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJOgcbLAAoJEJyvzxFWdG+VyQsH/2REPr79Z+VReAXPMMnUUvr9
to the
proposed branches when SRU process complete - all three branches
marked as 'Needs Fixing' referring to linked bug.
Cheers
James
--
James Page
Ubuntu Server Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
a look at the final bundled dependency over the next few days.
Cheers
James
--
James Page
Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server Team
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https
and take it from here?
I would be up for this; the upstream build process is completely
non-standard but we should be able to work it into something more
maintainable.
Cheers
James
--
James Page
Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server Team
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
Hi,
Here are the minutes of the server team meeting. They can also be found online
with the irc logs here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs/Server/20110405.
Meeting Actions
* Daviey to submit UDS-O topic for translations and docs
* jamespage to helpout with verification
32 matches
Mail list logo
