Re: Brainstorming for UDS-Q - Build Prioritization

2012-04-16 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 02:51:47PM -0700, Scott Ritchie wrote: > Archive skew is even more pernicious: it can make packages with > cross-architecture dependencies (notably Wine) completely > uninstallable. Now that multiarch is a thing this will be an > increasing problem for anyone testing a deve

Re: Brainstorming for UDS-Q - Build Prioritization

2012-04-16 Thread Scott Ritchie
On 4/13/12 7:22 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: I won't be at UDS, so if this is of interest to someone, I would really like it if someone who is would take the ball and run with it. Currently build sequence on the buildds is determined (primarily) by a combination of pocket and component: https://h

Re: Brainstorming for UDS-Q - Build Prioritization

2012-04-13 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:22:36AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > I think we should change the scoring model in Launchpad (yes, this would be > an > LP change, but I think it should be driven by Ubuntu) to include a > seeded/unseeded element as well. This would give us more images available >

Re: Brainstorming for UDS-Q - Build Prioritization

2012-04-13 Thread Rick Spencer
I think this is a brilliant idea. I think that "keep ISOs buildable" would have a wonderful impact on everyone's velocity and quality. Cheers, Rick On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > I won't be at UDS, so if this is of interest to someone, I would really > like > it if som

Brainstorming for UDS-Q - Build Prioritization

2012-04-13 Thread Scott Kitterman
I won't be at UDS, so if this is of interest to someone, I would really like it if someone who is would take the ball and run with it. Currently build sequence on the buildds is determined (primarily) by a combination of pocket and component: https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/BuildScores In