Re: Patch Pilot Report 20120615

2012-06-15 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from James Page's message of 2012-06-15 05:57:41 -0700: > Hi Daniel > > On 15/06/12 13:31, Daniel Holbach wrote: > > On 15.06.2012 14:08, James Page wrote: > >>> SRU's which have been uploaded but not accepted are hard to > >>> differentiate on the report - they don't require any further

Re: Patch Pilot Report 20120615

2012-06-15 Thread James Page
Hi Daniel On 15/06/12 13:31, Daniel Holbach wrote: > On 15.06.2012 14:08, James Page wrote: >>> SRU's which have been uploaded but not accepted are hard to >>> differentiate on the report - they don't require any further >>> sponsor action so it would be good to be able to filter those >>> out if

Re: Patch Pilot Report 20120615

2012-06-15 Thread Daniel Holbach
Hello, On 15.06.2012 14:08, James Page wrote: > SRU's which have been uploaded but not accepted are hard to > differentiate on the report - they don't require any further sponsor > action so it would be good to be able to filter those out if possible. That's a good point. I usually set the bug to

Patch Pilot Report 20120615

2012-06-15 Thread James Page
Report for my patch piloting today: https://code.launchpad.net/~veger/ubuntu/quantal/jsch/fix-for-803492-v2/+merge/104706 - Made minor tweak to OSGi manifest for new upstream release and uploaded. https://code.launchpad.net/~gandelman-a/ubuntu/precise/openldap/proposed-rebuild/+merge/104814 -