On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 01:17:52PM -0700, Brian Murray wrote:
> On IRC we talked about using the "Contact this user" feature of
> Launchpad. Did you end up getting many more votes after doing that?
Thank you for the suggestion!
Yes, although unfortunately I don't know if the votes were prompted b
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 03:22:25PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 10:14:06AM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> > Do you have evidence that has actually happened to anyone in this
> > case? I was able to vote quite easily, and it seems (from your ML
> > comments) that both Christian
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 10:22 AM Robie Basak wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 10:14:06AM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> > Do you have evidence that has actually happened to anyone in this
> > case? I was able to vote quite easily, and it seems (from your ML
> > comments) that both Christian and y
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 10:14:06AM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> Do you have evidence that has actually happened to anyone in this
> case? I was able to vote quite easily, and it seems (from your ML
> comments) that both Christian and yourself were as well, and Christian
> provided explicit steps e
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 11:15 AM Dan Streetman wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 9:45 AM Robie Basak wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 09:19:31AM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> > > For example, in this situation; carrying out an election really
> > > shouldn't be an exceptional event.
>
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 9:45 AM Robie Basak wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 09:19:31AM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> > For example, in this situation; carrying out an election really
> > shouldn't be an exceptional event.
>
> Normally it isn't. Previous elections have run smoothly and with no
>
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 09:19:31AM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> For example, in this situation; carrying out an election really
> shouldn't be an exceptional event.
Normally it isn't. Previous elections have run smoothly and with no
issues that I'm aware of.
However we now have an interaction be
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 8:57 AM Robie Basak wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 06:14:27AM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> > Where are the rules/policies written down about how elections should
> > be handled?
>
> The first time I ran an election I couldn't find much documentation at
> all, so I trie
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 06:14:27AM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> Where are the rules/policies written down about how elections should
> be handled?
The first time I ran an election I couldn't find much documentation at
all, so I tried to follow what I could see of what had been done before,
fixed
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 6:14 AM Dan Streetman wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 6:02 AM Robie Basak wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 12:51:52PM +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> > > If you happen to activate the "wrong" email you'll just see:
> > >
> > > ```
> > > Email address successf
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 6:02 AM Robie Basak wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 12:51:52PM +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> > If you happen to activate the "wrong" email you'll just see:
> >
> > ```
> > Email address successfully activated.
> > ```
> >
> > But if you activate the right one (jus
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 12:51:52PM +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> If you happen to activate the "wrong" email you'll just see:
>
> ```
> Email address successfully activated.
> ```
>
> But if you activate the right one (just as Robie said, usually the
> @ubuntu.com one) you'd in the Web UI
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 12:06 PM Robie Basak wrote:
>
> The Developer Membership Board (DMB) has started a restaffing vote for
> three vacant seats. The DMB is responsible for reviewing and approving
> new Ubuntu developers. It evaluates prospective Ubuntu developers and
> decides when to entrust
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Friday, February 01, 2013 11:27:07 AM Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
> ...
>> I like Daniel's idea of having an informal exchange (maybe over a ping
>> or a pm on irc) of how the DMB thinks so that we can really get an
>> info of how the DMB t
On Friday, February 01, 2013 11:27:07 AM Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
...
> I like Daniel's idea of having an informal exchange (maybe over a ping
> or a pm on irc) of how the DMB thinks so that we can really get an
> info of how the DMB thinks on various cases so that we can provide a
> broad overview
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 5:42 AM, Steve Langasek
wrote:
> Hi Scott, Bhavani,
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:36:38AM +0530, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
>> What I believe is a perspective developer gets ready for applying at a
>> particular level when a minimum of one developer of ranks of core dev
On Thursday, January 31, 2013 04:12:25 PM Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Scott, Bhavani,
>
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 03:02:44AM +, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > Regardless of if it's the DMB or other delegated body, the decision about
> > upload rights is on behalf of the Ubuntu project and it needs
Hi Scott, Bhavani,
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 03:02:44AM +, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Regardless of if it's the DMB or other delegated body, the decision about
> upload rights is on behalf of the Ubuntu project and it needs to be taken
> with the project's needs in mind. I don't think there is a
On Thursday, January 31, 2013 05:08:22 PM Jani Monoses wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 09:06:31 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Thursday, January 31, 2013 09:23:39 AM Jani Monoses wrote:
> >> On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:22:58 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >> > Hello,
> >>
> >> [snip]
> >>
> >> > Th
On Jan 31, 2013, at 05:08 PM, Jani Monoses wrote:
>There is too much coupling between Ubuntu membership and upload rights.
This comes up often, and there have been discussions about separating the two
aspects but nothing's come of it. I do think it would be useful to separate
these concerns, esp
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 09:06:31 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Thursday, January 31, 2013 09:23:39 AM Jani Monoses wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:22:58 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> > Hello,
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> > That's certainly true, but I think this is something that the DMB has
>> > a du
On 01/30/2013 07:22 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 09:36:19AM -0600, Micah Gersten wrote:
>> The Developer Membership Board has started a vote to restaff for the
>> four members whose terms are expiring. The Developer Membership Board is
>> responsible for reviewing
On Thursday, January 31, 2013 03:30:42 PM Daniel Holbach wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 31.01.2013 15:08, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > While the advisory team can,
> > and should, encourage and support applicants, I think we should be careful
> > to avoid making them an intermediary.
>
> I wasn't trying to
Hello,
On 31.01.2013 15:08, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> While the advisory team can,
> and should, encourage and support applicants, I think we should be careful to
> avoid making them an intermediary.
I wasn't trying to say that this should be a mandatory step.
If you go back to my original mail
On Thursday, January 31, 2013 03:03:52 PM Daniel Holbach wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 31.01.2013 14:51, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > I don't think having an intermediary between the DMB and the applicant is
> > a
> > good idea. I think approximately that last thing we need is more
> > meetings.
>
> I di
On Thursday, January 31, 2013 09:23:39 AM Jani Monoses wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:22:58 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Hello,
>
> [snip]
>
> > That's certainly true, but I think this is something that the DMB has a
> > duty to correct. Frankly, I think there's no reason that Adam and Björ
Hello,
On 31.01.2013 14:51, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I don't think having an intermediary between the DMB and the applicant is a
> good idea. I think approximately that last thing we need is more meetings.
I didn't say that this needs to happen in a meeting format.
In your earlier mail you sai
On Thursday, January 31, 2013 11:43:41 AM Daniel Holbach wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 31.01.2013 11:08, Iain Lane wrote:
> > As others have said, it's probably not going to be possible to reduce
> > the process to going through a checklist. What we can do is to be
> > responsive /and proactive/ when app
Hello,
On 31.01.2013 11:08, Iain Lane wrote:
> As others have said, it's probably not going to be possible to reduce
> the process to going through a checklist. What we can do is to be
> responsive /and proactive/ when applications first come in (or even
> before then, if applicants contact the DM
Hello Jani,
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 09:23:39AM +, Jani Monoses wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:22:58 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> [snip]
> > That's certainly true, but I think this is something that the DMB has a
> > duty to correct. Frankly, I think there's no reason that Ada
Hi Steve,
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 04:22:58PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hello,
> […]
> So my question to each of the candidates is this. As a member of the DMB,
> what would you do to remove this uncertainty around when people are ready to
> apply, reducing the number of rejections (whether t
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:22:58 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hello,
[snip]
> That's certainly true, but I think this is something that the DMB has a
> duty to correct. Frankly, I think there's no reason that Adam and Björn
> couldn't have been ready for upload rights by January, *if* the DMB's
I
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 5:52 AM, Steve Langasek
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 09:36:19AM -0600, Micah Gersten wrote:
>> The Developer Membership Board has started a vote to restaff for the
>> four members whose terms are expiring. The Developer Membership Board is
>> responsible for
On Wednesday, January 30, 2013 04:22:58 PM Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 09:36:19AM -0600, Micah Gersten wrote:
> > The Developer Membership Board has started a vote to restaff for the
> > four members whose terms are expiring. The Developer Membership Board is
> > res
On 31/01/13 00:22, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 09:36:19AM -0600, Micah Gersten wrote:
>> The Developer Membership Board has started a vote to restaff for the
>> four members whose terms are expiring. The Developer Membership Board is
>> responsible for reviewing and
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 09:36:19AM -0600, Micah Gersten wrote:
> The Developer Membership Board has started a vote to restaff for the
> four members whose terms are expiring. The Developer Membership Board is
> responsible for reviewing and approving new Ubuntu developers. It
> evaluates pr
36 matches
Mail list logo
