Hi,
Le 20/12/2012 13:00, ubuntu-devel-requ...@lists.ubuntu.com a écrit :
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 11:16:49 -0500 From: Barry Warsaw
ba...@ubuntu.com To: ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Subject: Re: Styles
of Packaging (was: Deprecating the wiki-based Packaging Guide)
Message-ID
On Dec 18, 2012, at 06:05 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
UDD poses a different set of problems. I'm not sure how relevant it is to
the upstream developer who just wants to package their software; at the very
least, I think the developer docs should explicitly deal with the
possibility that the
On 12/18/2012 01:16 AM, Emmet Hikory wrote:
Mike Carifio wrote:
On 12/17/2012 08:11 PM, Emmet Hikory wrote:
Where this is understandably annoying for the application developer
is that the recommendation is subject to change over time, as newer
tools are developed and adopted: we tend to
Mike Carifio wrote:
I would opine that many application developers are more than annoyed,
they're lost. So presenting them with all the various variants and
then asking them to select the right one based on criteria they neither
appreciate nor care about pretty well assures that many will
On 19/12/2012 00:30, Barry Warsaw wrote:
I'm positive I'm not typical, but I personally find Ubuntu development so much
more pleasant than Debian development that I'll use the Debian branches on
Launchpad for 90% of my on Debian work. It's only at the last mile that
I'll switch over to e.g.
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 03:16:13PM +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote:
While it may appear that way at first glance, this is very much an
intentional consequence of policy-based packaging, which Ubuntu inherits
from Debian. By having packaging judged against policy, rather than
against some
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 02:08:04AM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
1. While there are sponsors that prefer branches over debdiffs/source
packages uploaded somewhere, I don't know of any that will only sponsor
branches. The reverse is not true. There are developers that don't do
UDD
Steve Langasek steve.langa...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 02:08:04AM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
1. While there are sponsors that prefer branches over
debdiffs/source
packages uploaded somewhere, I don't know of any that will only
sponsor
branches. The reverse is not true.
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 09:19:31PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Steve Langasek steve.langa...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 02:08:04AM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
1. While there are sponsors that prefer branches over debdiffs/source
packages uploaded somewhere, I don't know
On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 03:16:13 PM Emmet Hikory wrote:
There is definitely a set of tools that are currently the most popular
in the Debian archive, and these integrate well with a set of tools being
developed under the Ubuntu Distributed Development moniker, which
combination may
10 matches
Mail list logo
