On 9/17/07, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 01:09:44PM +0200, Mihamina (R12y) Rakotomandimby
> wrote:
> > Why is the amd64 release/tribe always late?
>
> It isn't. amd64 releases happen at the exact same time as i386.
>
> > My favorite example is about the Xen sup
On 9/18/07, Todd Deshane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/18/07, Andrew Jorgensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Would it make sense to promote nspluginwrapper [0] to main for amd64?
> > openSUSE will be including it in 10.3[1]. It seems a better solution
> > user-wise than including the still-al
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 12:25:00PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > 2. Repositories added through apturl could provide packages included
> > in Ubuntu but with higher version numbers with malicious code.
>
> ... this is a feature, not an issue.
I'm really not convinced by that. We shouldn't be m
On 9/18/07, Andrew Jorgensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would it make sense to promote nspluginwrapper [0] to main for amd64?
> openSUSE will be including it in 10.3[1]. It seems a better solution
> user-wise than including the still-alpha gnash.
>
> [0] http://gwenole.beauchesne.info/projects/n
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 19:13:44 +0200, "Markus Hitter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
>
> Am 17.09.2007 um 17:44 schrieb Sarah Hobbs:
>
> > There is simply no way to deal with the current lot of open bugs,
> > to get
> > an overview of them all, let alone having the invalid ones in there -
> > the pro
Would it make sense to promote nspluginwrapper [0] to main for amd64?
openSUSE will be including it in 10.3[1]. It seems a better solution
user-wise than including the still-alpha gnash.
[0] http://gwenole.beauchesne.info/projects/nspluginwrapper/
[1]
http://en.opensuse.org/Factory/News#Changes_
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 10:11:49AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Sarah Hobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > As one of those who triages various KDE bugs...in the area of KDEBase,
> > in particular, there are around 450 open bugs, we *have* to close
> > invalid bugs. There are around 750, wi
Am 17.09.2007 um 17:44 schrieb Sarah Hobbs:
> There is simply no way to deal with the current lot of open bugs,
> to get
> an overview of them all, let alone having the invalid ones in there -
> the problem gets too great, and you can't solve any of it (and become
> very demotivated in the proc
Martin Pitt wrote:
> HI,
>
> Till Kamppeter [2007-09-18 13:34 +0100]:
>> hplip-gui is marked as a binary-only demotion to Universe. Should it not
>> stay in main, only not being on the Ubuntu and Xubuntu desktop CDs? On
>> Kubuntu it should be even seeded to get onto the CD, as Kubuntu ships
>>
On Monday 17 September 2007 06:11:01 Scott Ritchie wrote:
> Murat Gunes wrote:
> > You may want to file a bug in the ubuntu-cdimage product at Launchpad if
> > you feel the warning should be in some other form and/or made more explicit.
>
> Fair enough. Done: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-cd
HI,
Till Kamppeter [2007-09-18 13:34 +0100]:
> hplip-gui is marked as a binary-only demotion to Universe. Should it not
> stay in main, only not being on the Ubuntu and Xubuntu desktop CDs? On
> Kubuntu it should be even seeded to get onto the CD, as Kubuntu ships
> the needed python-qt3 by def
hplip-gui is marked as a binary-only demotion to Universe. Should it not
stay in main, only not being on the Ubuntu and Xubuntu desktop CDs? On
Kubuntu it should be even seeded to get onto the CD, as Kubuntu ships
the needed python-qt3 by default.
Till
Colin Watson wrote:
> The Ubuntu 7.10
On 18/09/2007, Henrik Nilsen Omma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> > Sarah Hobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> >> As one of those who triages various KDE bugs...in the area of KDEBase,
> >> in particular, there are around 450 open bugs, we *have* to close
> >> invalid
Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Sarah Hobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>> As one of those who triages various KDE bugs...in the area of KDEBase,
>> in particular, there are around 450 open bugs, we *have* to close
>> invalid bugs. There are around 750, with the INVALID and WONTFIX bugs
>> includ
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 10:33:15PM +0200, Wouter Stomp wrote:
> 1. It's possible to run arbitrary scripts in the preinst/postrm phase
> of dpkg installation or the installed program itself could be
> malicious. By allowing the repository to be specified the deb can come
> from anywhere. So, you've
Sarah Hobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As one of those who triages various KDE bugs...in the area of KDEBase,
> in particular, there are around 450 open bugs, we *have* to close
> invalid bugs. There are around 750, with the INVALID and WONTFIX bugs
> included.
Please correct me, but I suspec
16 matches
Mail list logo