Re: Password-protect grub interactive commands (was: rationale of root access from boot)

2007-11-11 Thread Thilo Six
Nicolas Deschildre wrote the following on 11.11.2007 07:22 > On 11/10/07, Thilo Six <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Nicolas Deschildre wrote the following on 10.11.2007 07:06 >> >> <<-snip->> >> >>> Thanks for the pointer. >>> But then, why not use this password feature by default to avoid anyone >>>

Re: Azureus was - Re: GIMP *final* release for Gutsy?

2007-11-11 Thread Peter
On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 23:32:03 -0500 Scott Kitterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday 10 November 2007 21:49, Peter wrote: > > > I understand the point of view of not fixing bugs at the end life of > > a cycle, but certain software updates aren't in Ubuntu yet while new > > version have bee

Re: GIMP *final* release for Gutsy?

2007-11-11 Thread Greg K Nicholson
Dean Sas: > Greg K Nicholson wrote: >> So we're actually getting 2.4.1 (or something very much like it), but >> labelled “2.4.0rc3”? > > Precisely. Often Ubuntu packages might include patches from upstream > that haven't yet been made part of a release. See Emmet's review for the > exact details

Re: GIMP *final* release for Gutsy?

2007-11-11 Thread João Pinto
> Has anybody considered simply removing the words "Release Candidate" > from the splash screen? So far, the countless emails on this topic seem to point out the shock > and confusion that a new user will experience when seeing "Release > Candidate". The emails seem to try and extend this reasonin

Re: GIMP *final* release for Gutsy?

2007-11-11 Thread Aaron C. de Bruyn
> > Upgrading simply because there is a newer version number is the wrong > > attitude. > > I agree. And if this were about 4.0 to 4.1 or 4.3 to 4.7, I would be > 100% with you. So you agree that upgrading because a change in the MINOR version number or BUILD number is the wrong attitude. > Bu

Re: GIMP *final* release for Gutsy?

2007-11-11 Thread Aaron C. de Bruyn
> And how do you know that no one is having a problem? Oboviusly > *somebody* is or the latest release would not be 4.0.1. Bug reports. If someone is having a problem and they file a bug report, it will get dealt with. > And just becasuse Ubuntu users haven't reported the bugs that the GIMP > de

Re: GIMP *final* release for Gutsy?

2007-11-11 Thread Aaron C. de Bruyn
> I often report it to both Ubuntu and Upstream. Things tend to get fixed > more quickly that way. Ubuntu bugs can sit for *months* (and even over a > year) untouched. I have run into similar issues. I am being affected by a bug on my server that prevents it from seeing all my drives. The change

Re: GIMP *final* release for Gutsy?

2007-11-11 Thread Evan
While I realize that there is rarely much difference between rc and final release versions, I'm surprised that Gutsy shipped with the rc version of gimp. I was under the impression that the Ubuntu policy was to ship only stable, released versions of software with each major release. Parts of the ne

Re: Windows Program Support

2007-11-11 Thread Jan Claeys
Op vrijdag 09-11-2007 om 02:24 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Sebastian Heinlein: > Perhaps we could perform a ClamAV scan before running a Windows > application? Does that need to have a clamav daemon running (IME, it isn't very reliable...)? (Also, there is ClamFS for FUSE, would that be useful.

Re: Windows Program Support

2007-11-11 Thread Jan Claeys
Op vrijdag 09-11-2007 om 10:45 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Markus Hitter: > Please don't. Autorun is a Windows-ism, even Mac OS X with it's much > applauded GUI refuses to do such nasty things. I suggest you have a look at System -> Preferences -> Removable storage & media (in Ubuntu)... --

Re: Windows Program Support

2007-11-11 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Sunday 11 November 2007 18:21, Jan Claeys wrote: > Op vrijdag 09-11-2007 om 02:24 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Sebastian > Does that need to have a clamav daemon running (IME, it isn't very > reliable...)? If there are problems, please report bugs. We don't have any such bugs open right now

Re: A Wine-like compatibility layer to run Mac OS X programs on Linux?

2007-11-11 Thread Jan Claeys
Op vrijdag 09-11-2007 om 05:32 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Sebastian Heinlein: > AFAIK you are not allowed to virtualize MacOS. Which is not enforceable in how many countries...? :) -- Jan Claeys -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or

Re: Password-protect grub interactive commands (was: rationale of root access from boot)

2007-11-11 Thread Jan Claeys
Op zaterdag 10-11-2007 om 14:06 uur [tijdzone +0800], schreef Nicolas Deschildre: > But then, why not use this password feature by default to avoid anyone > to edit boot parameter and become root? In addition to what was mentioned already: GRUB only knows about plain us keyboards, while many/most

Re: Windows Program Support

2007-11-11 Thread Jan Claeys
Op zondag 11-11-2007 om 18:27 uur [tijdzone -0500], schreef Scott Kitterman: > On Sunday 11 November 2007 18:21, Jan Claeys wrote: > > Op vrijdag 09-11-2007 om 02:24 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef > > Sebastian > > > Does that need to have a clamav daemon running (IME, it isn't very > > reliable...

Re: Windows Program Support

2007-11-11 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Sunday 11 November 2007 21:28, Jan Claeys wrote: > Op zondag 11-11-2007 om 18:27 uur [tijdzone -0500], schreef Scott > > Kitterman: > > On Sunday 11 November 2007 18:21, Jan Claeys wrote: > > > Op vrijdag 09-11-2007 om 02:24 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef > > > Sebastian > > > > > > Does that nee

Re: Windows Program Support

2007-11-11 Thread Evan
On Nov 11, 2007 6:25 PM, Jan Claeys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I suggest you have a look at System -> Preferences -> Removable storage > & media (in Ubuntu)... > I could be wrong, but doesn't that just automatically launch every binary on the disk? If it does refer to the autorun I was talking

Re: Windows Program Support

2007-11-11 Thread Scott Ritchie
Evan wrote: > On Nov 11, 2007 6:25 PM, Jan Claeys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I suggest you have a look at System -> Preferences -> Removable storage >> & media (in Ubuntu)... >> > > I could be wrong, but doesn't that just automatically launch every binary on > the disk? If it does refer to t

Re: Password-protect grub interactive commands (was: rationale of root access from boot)

2007-11-11 Thread Scott James Remnant
On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 14:06 +0800, Nicolas Deschildre wrote: > But then, why not use this password feature by default to avoid anyone > to edit boot parameter and become root? > Because it adds a level of complexity without a significant gain. The additional complexity is that users would have t