Aaron C. de Bruyn wrote:
>> Aaron C. de Bruyn:
>>
>>> It boils down to this: If users aren't running into bugs, why repackage?
>>>
>> Because having “Release Conadidate” on the splash screen and “rc” in the
>> About box gives users the impression that this is not a trustworthy,
>> fi
> Aaron C. de Bruyn:
> > It boils down to this: If users aren't running into bugs, why repackage?
>
> Because having “Release Conadidate” on the splash screen and “rc” in the
> About box gives users the impression that this is not a trustworthy,
> final version of GIMP.
Kinda like how hundreds
Peter wrote:
> It's not as simple is that, you need a sponsor for your patches to be
> approved. And currently there are 45 "bugs" in the sponsorship queue,
> 5 are committed, 4 in progress, 3 triaged, 16 confirmed (one as late as
> 2006-03-03) and 17 new the oldest dating back to 2006-12-14.
>
>
Dean Sas wrote:
>> So we're actually getting 2.4.1 (or something very much like it), but
>> labelled “2.4.0rc3”?
>
> Precisely. Often Ubuntu packages might include patches from upstream
> that haven't yet been made part of a release. See Emmet's review for the
> exact details in this case.
If th
On Nov 13, 2007 12:25 AM, Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Ubuntu Studio team is considering shipping Compiz (with a minimal
> config) in Ubuntu Studio-Hardy 8.08.
>
> Some have said that moving the drawing of windows off the the GFX card
> would help the load on the CPU and thus keep xruns
OK, just forget the GRUB password idea, I've understood how it can
become a complete mess. Sorry for the idea...
But what about that?
unggnu wrote:
>
>
> I like the way Ubuntu handles root that always sudo is needed so why we
> don't make it with Recovery mode too? Just don't autologin root like
Nicolas Deschildre wrote the following on 12.11.2007 11:04
<<-snip->>
> This is EOT for me.
>
> Nicolas
Nicolas if i sound rude in my last mail i apologize for that.
bye
--
Thilo
key: 0x4A411E09
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or
Chris Warburton wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 17:41 +0100, Thilo Six wrote:
>> Milan wrote the following on 10.11.2007 16:56
>>
>> <<-snip->>
>>
>>> All in all, I'd rather suggest to activate password-locked GRUB, but I
>>> understand this question is hard to decide. Does anybody see other
>>> agr
On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 10:25 -0500, Cory K. wrote:
> The Ubuntu Studio team is considering shipping Compiz (with a minimal
> config) in Ubuntu Studio-Hardy 8.08.
>
> Some have said that moving the drawing of windows off the the GFX card
> would help the load on the CPU and thus keep xruns to a min
The Ubuntu Studio team is considering shipping Compiz (with a minimal
config) in Ubuntu Studio-Hardy 8.08.
Some have said that moving the drawing of windows off the the GFX card
would help the load on the CPU and thus keep xruns to a minimum.
Any thoughts/ideas on this one?
-Cory \m/
--
Ubuntu
I think we're only *surprised* that this isn't being done already
because the Ubuntu team are usually so unreservedly awesome, and have
usually figured out a way to make stuff happen and have actually made
the stuff happen, before we were even aware that we *wanted* said stuff
to happen. Genera
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 23:52:29 +1100
Christopher James Halse Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> But you don't need to be a MOTU to do the work, and since gimp is in
> main, it doesn't much help being a MOTU either. The uploading to the
> archives part is by far the quickest and simplest part o
On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 07:13 -0500, Peter wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 22:47:34 +1100
> Sarah Hobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Greg K Nicholson wrote:
> > > We'd only have to do this *once* for each package of which a
> > > non-final version was released in Ubuntu final. Once the final
> > >
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 22:47:34 +1100
Sarah Hobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greg K Nicholson wrote:
> > We'd only have to do this *once* for each package of which a
> > non-final version was released in Ubuntu final. Once the final
> > version of the package is available, there need be no more upd
Greg K Nicholson wrote:
> We'd only have to do this *once* for each package of which a non-final
> version was released in Ubuntu final. Once the final version of the
> package is available, there need be no more updates (beyond what are
> already done).
>
> Hopefully a commitment to doing this
Am Montag, den 12.11.2007, 00:21 +0100 schrieb Jan Claeys:
> Op vrijdag 09-11-2007 om 02:24 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Sebastian
> Heinlein:
> > Perhaps we could perform a ClamAV scan before running a Windows
> > application?
>
> Does that need to have a clamav daemon running (IME, it isn't ver
Hi!
Is there a simple way of configuring Ubuntu to disable the touchpad on
the laptop in case it detects a usb-mouse connected to the computer?
It's a nuisance to go through the preferences to disable the touchpad. I
have a Fujitsu-Siemens Amilo L 1300.
//Matthias Andersson
--
Ubuntu-devel-d
Am Montag, den 12.11.2007, 00:29 +0100 schrieb Jan Claeys:
> Op vrijdag 09-11-2007 om 05:32 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Sebastian
> Heinlein:
> > AFAIK you are not allowed to virtualize MacOS.
>
> Which is not enforceable in how many countries...? :)
Nevertheless you should respect the author
Greg K Nicholson:
> no more updates (beyond what are
> already done).
By this I meant “no more updates (other than the current normal update
processes)”. I certainly didn't mean freeze all updates on that package
forever. That would be silly :)
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-dev
On Nov 12, 2007 2:15 PM, Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 14:06 +0800, Nicolas Deschildre wrote:
[...]
>
> For the simplest installations, GRUB could perhaps read /etc/shadow and
> accept any user's password -- but that would be error-prone, open to
> exploit
Aaron C. de Bruyn:
> It boils down to this: If users aren't running into bugs, why repackage?
Because having “Release Conadidate” on the splash screen and “rc” in the
About box gives users the impression that this is not a trustworthy,
final version of GIMP.
And because the version number the
Aaron C. de Bruyn:
> So you are saying that we should react to new versions by packaging the up on
> the basis that there are probably users that could maybe be having bugs but
> haven't reported them.
We should react on that basis only to new, stable versions of packages
where the current vers
22 matches
Mail list logo
