RE: Problem with Grub being installed in MBR as default (GG)

De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] en nombre de Evan Enviado el: mar 08/04/2008 1:48 Para: ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Asunto: Re: Problem with Grub being installed in MBR as default (GG) IMHO, adding a boot-loader page to the installer would cause more trouble than it's worth with new users.

Re: hardy release freeze, coming soon to an archive near you

Steve Langasek wrote: Dear developers, With the release of Ubuntu 8.04 LTS scheduled for a mere 2 1/2 weeks from today, we are fast approaching the point at which we will freeze the archive to limit the number of last-minute changes entering the release. On Thursday, April 10, the archive

Big scanner regression

Somehow between Gutsy and Hardy (I'm guessing with the new CUPS GUI), a regression was introduced where no HP scanners work with Hardy. These were probably the easiest scanners to get going before, and because they're attached to the very-compatible HP printers, I'm sure a *lot* of people have

anyone else seeing X breakage with this AM's hardy updates?

From .xsession-errors on any of my hosts: /usr/bin/compiz.real (core) - Warn: Unable to parse XML metadata from file ccp.xml Throttle level is 5 Starting gtk-window-decorator /usr/bin/compiz.real (video) - Warn: No 8 bit GLX pixmap format, disabling YV12 image format I/O warning :

Re: anyone else seeing X breakage with this AM's hardy updates?

Yes, I'm having issues as well. I just now applied the updates and for starters transparency is not working well. Applets that have transparency show thin white borders. I'm still looking into what else is not working properly, but there are definately issues. Marc On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 10:39

Re: Please keep the old IDE chipset drivers so that external CD writers can work

Rick Knight wrote: I'm not sure I follow you here. Are you suggesting I upgrade to the Hardy beta, or just set my repositories to Hardy and update. Won't that be an upgrade? How stable is Hardy. I know the code freeze is this week, but is it safe to upgrade to Hardy? I am suggesting you try

Fedora 9 Beta does sound. Ubuntu Hardy does not?

Both are betas and both use PulseAudio. Why is it that it works out of the box in Fedora but not in Ubuntu? All things being equal, I *much* prefer Ubuntu but not having sound doesn't make things equal. This is driving me mad. I just did (yet another) fresh install of Hardy yesterday with the

Re: Fedora 9 Beta does sound. Ubuntu Hardy does not?

Scott (angrykeyboarder) spake thusly: Yes, I've (added to) bug reports... Speaking of which... https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/179095 It's not mine, but it describes my problem. I added my notes confirming it. This bug was filed on 28 December 2007. And it's still undecided. Did

Re: Big scanner regression

Hi, Mackenzie Morgan [2008-04-08 10:53 -0400]: Somehow between Gutsy and Hardy (I'm guessing with the new CUPS GUI), a regression was introduced where no HP scanners work with Hardy. These were probably the easiest scanners to get going before, and because they're attached to the

Re: Please keep the old IDE chipset drivers so that external CD writers can work

Wenzhuo Zhang wrote: Rick Knight wrote: I'm not sure I follow you here. Are you suggesting I upgrade to the Hardy beta, or just set my repositories to Hardy and update. Won't that be an upgrade? How stable is Hardy. I know the code freeze is this week, but is it safe to upgrade to Hardy?

Re: Fedora 9 Beta does sound. Ubuntu Hardy does not?

On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 00:27 +, Scott (angrykeyboarder) wrote: The only sounds I hear are at GDM login screen and when I do the hardware test. Otherwise, nothing, nada, zilch. Is System Preferences Sound tab Sounds Enable Software Mixing checked? -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing