2008/9/13 (R)om [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Every action taken is logged in ~/.recently-used and ~/.recently-used.xbel.
It should be fine to provide a way to disable this (useless?) logging.
It's definitely not useless: the documents are seen in Places → Recent
Documents (and the list can be manually
2008/9/14 Tristan Wibberley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 12:51 +0200, Krzysztof Lichota wrote:
As an author of Prefetch, I cannot agree that it would not fix seeks ;)
Part of my implementation, not enabled by default as it is highly
experimental, is ext3 defragmenter which puts all
ma, 2008-09-15 kello 11:05 +0200, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk kirjoitti:
2008/9/13 (R)om [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Every action taken is logged in ~/.recently-used and ~/.recently-used.xbel.
It should be fine to provide a way to disable this (useless?) logging.
It's definitely not useless: the
2008/9/12 Mackenzie Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 09:35 +0200, Krzysztof Lichota wrote:
Thanks. There are some rough edges in patches themselves which should
be straightened out. And the feedback on using prefetch was pretty
much non-existing.
What is the recommended way of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Owens wrote on 13/09/08 04:18:
...
One of the concerns I have is with configurations, specifically those
in /etc and those in ~/.* . The files in /etc are known to the apt
system and it's been built to warn the user if config files are to
Am 14.09.2008 um 03:32 schrieb Null Ack:
Action Item 1: I'm not a developer, but I can help any developers with
testing and feedback for enhancements to Apport.
Null,
your investments in enhancing Apport ist great. Now, a few weeks
later, I've learned Apport can map coredumps to readable
Hello all,
readers of this list might be interested in the discussion here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.0/+bug/269656/
It's about a new requirement from the Mozilla Foundation, how End
User License Agreements (EULAs) are against the spirit of free
software and the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Linux is trademarked, yet I see no EULA for it. Trademarks can be free
depending on how they're licensed. I already believe Firefox's no
modifcations policy is already fairly bad, and now we need an EULA on
top of being restricted on changing it? Bah,
One compelling reason (which I also posted on that launchpad thread)
not to keep on using Firefox is that Mozilla can hurt Ubuntu with this
stuff. They can demand all kinds of stuff way too late in Ubuntu's
development cycle, with no time for Ubuntu to properly respond to it.
The web browser is a
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 13:12, Peteris Krisjanis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
IMHO, several ways to handle that:
1) Cave in to Mozilla request (Trademarks are trademarks. They are
bitch and their protection are somehow incompatible with free
software. But that's life)
2) Provide Iceweasel
Disclaimer: I'm not trademark lawyer, but do know people with some
professional insight in this field.
Linux is trademarked, yet I see no EULA for it.
And it was one of reasons why Linux foundation almost lost trademark.
When they tried to enforce it properly, they heard all the same cries,
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk a écrit :
2008/9/13 (R)om[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Every action taken is logged in ~/.recently-used and ~/.recently-used.xbel.
It should be fine to provide a way to disable this (useless?) logging.
It's definitely not useless: the documents are seen in Places →
Almost every industry product we know has some sort of a trademark.
Yet, when you buy paper towels, grocery, shoes, ... nowhere you have
to agree to such an agreement. Not even when buying high-level items
like cars.
This is about the ability to distribute, not about the private at the
On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 14:01 +0200, Markus Hitter wrote:
Am 15.09.2008 um 13:45 schrieb Peteris Krisjanis:
trademarks are trademarks. They must be enforced and only
way for owners to control them is agreements.
Almost every industry product we know has some sort of a trademark.
Yet,
Giving out CDs for an early celebration of Software Freedom Day
yesterday, we were asked *very* often if Ubuntu had a web browser.
Yes, Firefox Oh good, I use that on Windows.
#1: Same response, and they're used to click-throughs anyway
#2: We'd have to explain all the trademark stuff and
2008/9/15 Andre Mussche [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I want to try to use e2defrag on my ext3 disk, to try to reorder the
bootfiles (of the readahead list),
so less head movements.
e2defrag is dangerous, can destroy your data, and should not be used.
See
I don't really like #3 because while I recognize that Webkit is a
*great* rendering engine, Firefox has a monopoly on extensions. Hrm,
maybe there needs to be some mass attempt at migrating FF extensions to
Epiphany.
By the way, I thought the same, and then I decided to check out
Epiphany -
On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 12:18 +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
ma, 2008-09-15 kello 11:05 +0200, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk kirjoitti:
2008/9/13 (R)om [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Every action taken is logged in ~/.recently-used and
~/.recently-used.xbel.
It should be fine to provide a way to
2008/9/15 Neal McBurnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
But first I'd like to actually read the EULA, and I'm surprised no one
has posted the text of it (as far as I have found) to this discussion
or to the bug.
The link to it was in the bug:
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/legal/eula/firefox3-en.html
--
hi,
On Mo, 2008-09-15 at 15:57 +0200, Andre Mussche wrote:
But I do not know how to optimize udev/modprobe and gnome?
i plan to work on some improved scripts for the modprobe issue in
jaunty, what you can do today is to provide a fixed list of modules
in /etc/initramfs-tools/modules, that
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Mackenzie Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 12:18 +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
ma, 2008-09-15 kello 11:05 +0200, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk kirjoitti:
2008/9/13 (R)om [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Every action taken is logged in ~/.recently-used
On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 14:08 -0400, A. Walton wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Mackenzie Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 12:18 +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
ma, 2008-09-15 kello 11:05 +0200, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk kirjoitti:
2008/9/13 (R)om [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Krzysztof Lichota wrote:
2008/9/15 Andre Mussche [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I want to try to use e2defrag on my ext3 disk, to try to reorder the
bootfiles (of the readahead list),
so less head movements.
e2defrag is dangerous, can destroy your data, and should not be used.
See
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 02:12:52PM +0300, Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
IMHO, several ways to handle that:
1) Cave in to Mozilla request (Trademarks are trademarks. They are
bitch and their protection are somehow incompatible with free
software. But that's life)
2) Provide Iceweasel and rebrand it
On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 14:12 +0300, Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
Hi!
IMHO, several ways to handle that:
1) Cave in to Mozilla request (Trademarks are trademarks. They are
bitch and their protection are somehow incompatible with free
software. But that's life)
2) Provide Iceweasel and rebrand it
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Mackenzie Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 14:08 -0400, A. Walton wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Mackenzie Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 12:18 +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
ma, 2008-09-15 kello 11:05
Is there an easy way to reject the EULA on the Firefox shipped with
Ubuntu and still be able to use the software? Has anyone patched the
source code to remove this yet?
I'm not just an end-user of the software, and I do not want to mess
around with licence agreements each time I want to modify
Just wanted to let everyone know that might live in Arizona about the linux
conference going on called Ableconf. You can find out more information at
the webpage http://Ableconf.com Platinum Arts Sandbox is to be featured
there. The Sandbox presentation media will be posted online after the
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 4:41 PM, Sean Hodges [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there an easy way to reject the EULA on the Firefox shipped with
Ubuntu and still be able to use the software? Has anyone patched the
source code to remove this yet?
Is ABrowser [1] sufficient for your purposes?
Denver
Denver Gingerich wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 4:41 PM, Sean Hodges [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there an easy way to reject the EULA on the Firefox shipped with
Ubuntu and still be able to use the software? Has anyone patched the
source code to remove this yet?
Is ABrowser [1] sufficient
Cross-posting to Ubuntu-devel-discuss.
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Scott Kitterman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is not directly about the current Firefox EULA debacle, but that is what
got me thinking about this topic.
As an Ubuntu developer, I am not allowed to patch Firefox and upload
On 15/09/08 18:52, Markus Hitter wrote:
Hello all,
readers of this list might be interested in the discussion here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.0/+bug/269656/
It's about a new requirement from the Mozilla Foundation, how End
User License Agreements (EULAs) are
32 matches
Mail list logo
