Hi all,
I made a tracking bug for having ext4 as the primary filesystem in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub/+bug/293465
Perhaps the description and stuff can be overhauled.
As a simple generic desktop user having an online defragger and better
journaling, data integrity is
Please stop filing nonsense bugs without first understanding the situation.
ext4 will become the default filesystem once upstream recommends it for
adoption (i.e. 2.6.28). GRUB still does not support reading ext4 so we will
probably need a separate /boot on ext2/ext3, or wait for one of the SoC
Jono Bacon wrote:
Hi everyone,
Just a quick note to let you know that Ubuntu Open Week has been
announced for the week of Mon 3 Nov - Fri 7 Nov in #ubuntu-classroom on
Freenode.
Ubuntu Open Week is a week of IRC tuition and Q+A sessions all about
getting involved in the rock-and-roll
Just to be clear, that was my point: just because a package is installed from
a deb and not a repo does not mean it is unwanted/unneeded/cruft.
But if people are installing apps from other sources, maybe we should include
such packages in the official repos/sources, etc.
Clearly this is not
Am 03.11.2008 um 13:35 schrieb Lars Wirzenius:
ma, 2008-11-03 kello 12:49 +0100, Markus Hitter kirjoitti:
To add my own $ o.o2, I'd very much like to see a tool or Synaptic
feature which tells me about the differences between a standard
install and the current set of installed packages.
2008/11/4 Matt Price [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 13:00 -0500, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 07:13 -0500, Matt Price wrote:
hi,
i just reported a bug on evolution
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/293046)
that,
on reflection,
Hi all,
The above post gives me another idea.
What do people think of using the same tool to sending those package
names which are not in the archive (which people are say using from
other sources) to add weight to needs-packaging request of the same
package.
Of course, this would need :-
a.
That error comes from lsof which cannot access ~/.gvfs because root !=
shirish. Pass -w into lsof to suppress that warning.
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 8:51 AM, shirish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Please look at this bug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/225361 .
Now I'm
