Am 14.11.2008 um 03:25 schrieb Scott Kitterman:
Perhaps Apport could be taught to roll the dice and return crash
reports in
some fraction of cases post-release (perhaps 5 or 10 percent).
This would
help us catch regressions.
I don't see a reason why Apport is automatically switched
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:51:53 + Matthew East [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 2:25 AM, Scott Kitterman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have heard people discuss post-release regressions due to SRU/security
updates. I was chatting with another developer last night who said he'd
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 09:44:00 +0100 Markus Hitter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 14.11.2008 um 03:25 schrieb Scott Kitterman:
Perhaps Apport could be taught to roll the dice and return crash
reports in
some fraction of cases post-release (perhaps 5 or 10 percent).
This would
help us catch
Scott Kitterman [2008-11-14 5:46 -0500]:
I do think if there's a reasonable way to report all crashes from
-proposed, that would be a good thing.
I agree. With a bit of apt-cache policy magic we can detect this on
the client side.
Problem is that in order to do that, we need to catch the
pe, 2008-11-14 kello 12:36 +0100, Martin Pitt kirjoitti:
Problem is that in order to do that, we need to catch the initial
crash first and write it to disk, i. e. we would get the CPU/IO
overhead again by default. That alone doesn't worry me too much, but
it might be an issue in certain
Did you make a bug report?
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 9:01 PM, richard [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Hi all , I've doned the asbestos pants
On an upgrade from 8.04 to 8.10 the symlink from /usr/bin/gcc
to /usr/bin/gcc-4.3 is not made.
on a clean install of 8.10 its made.
I verified it as well by
Are you sure that this is the case?
I have the symlink and I just some 2 weeks ago performed the upgrade.
thebluepill:~$ ls -al /usr/bin/gcc
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 2008-11-04 21:46 /usr/bin/gcc - gcc-4.3
The timestamp is also fairly reasonable although i guess an update
could theoretically
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 19:28:56 +0100
Henrik Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you sure that this is the case?
I have the symlink and I just some 2 weeks ago performed the upgrade.
thebluepill:~$ ls -al /usr/bin/gcc
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 2008-11-04 21:46 /usr/bin/gcc - gcc-4.3
The
Scott Kitterman ha scritto:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:14:31 -0500 Mackenzie Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I haven't bothered trying to use the GUI with my iwl4965 and WEP. I
just expect NM to not work when it comes to WEP.
I have 4965 and it worked fine for me with KNetworkManager and
