I have posted questions regarding large file systems. I was able to
reboot and maintain my 8.2TB file system. Commands follow.
My major problem was not setting label type to GPT in parted. Been away
for a couple of years:-(
> sudo parted /dev/sda
rm 1
mklabel gpt
(parted) mkpart p 0 9TB
(parte
Stephan Hermann wrote:
> Moins,
>
>
> On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 13:56:00 +0200
> Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
>
scsi0 : 3ware 9000 Storage Controller
3w-9xxx: scsi0: Found a 3ware 9000 Storage Controller at
0xd014, IRQ: 16.
3w-9xxx: scsi0: Firmware FE9X 2.04.00.005, BIOS BE9X 2.03
2009/3/23 Mackenzie Morgan
> On Monday 23 March 2009 10:02:53 am Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > When did we do compiz-by-default?
>
> That only seems like it should matter if you didn't use Compiz in Feisty
> and
> did in Gutsy. I used Beryl in Edgy up until it remerged with Compiz, then
> Compi
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 09:43:58AM -0400, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> On Monday 23 March 2009 9:18:59 am Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > ma, 2009-03-23 kello 11:57 +, Scott James Remnant kirjoitti:
> > > One good idea would be that the screen holds at the login screen after
> > > entering your password
John,
I see now. I agree, man-power is better spent on things other than
separating the free-cell game from the games package. I was simply trying
to figure out the reason why, and see if there was some way I could
contribute to giving the users of Ubuntu more freedom on what they have on
the
On Monday 23 March 2009 10:02:53 am Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 09:43 -0400, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
>
> > On Monday 23 March 2009 9:18:59 am Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > > ma, 2009-03-23 kello 11:57 +, Scott James Remnant kirjoitti:
> > > > One good idea would be that the
2009/3/23 Mike Jones :
> Hi guys. Thanks for your detailed replies.
>
> I think I'm having a difficult time expressing what I'm trying to get
> across. It's kind of a vague notion.
>
> My problem isn't that for me its difficult to either just remove the
> package entirely (in this case, I d
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 10:47 -0400, Paul Dufresne wrote:
> My reasoning is that the http://samba.org/~tridge/junkcode/aio_uid.c
> does seems to be all inside a simple process and not be using pthreads.
>
AIO is Asynchronous I/O.
Therefore an asynchronous operation can complete while *inside* the
Mike Jones wrote:
> Thanks for your reply. I understand the realistic restrictions that a
> developer faces when packaging applications.
...
> Is there just no way for a package maintaner to not have extra work
> piled on their already hefty load while at the same time we allow a user
> o
Scott said:
The Samba bug appears to be a race condition between AIO and setresuid()
Yep, but I tend to believe that this race condition is directly inside
the kernel.
My reasoning is that the http://samba.org/~tridge/junkcode/aio_uid.c
does seems to be all inside a simple process and not be usin
Hi guys. Thanks for your detailed replies.
I think I'm having a difficult time expressing what I'm trying to get
across. It's kind of a vague notion.
My problem isn't that for me its difficult to either just remove the
package entirely (in this case, I don't play any of those games and do
On Monday 23 March 2009 9:37:08 am Paul Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 08:53 -0400, Mike Jones wrote:
> > If Ubuntu said "Ok Boss" and pretended to remove one specific
> > program from a package for me, through the single "add or remove
> > programs to your system" interface of add/remove
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 09:43 -0400, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> On Monday 23 March 2009 9:18:59 am Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > ma, 2009-03-23 kello 11:57 +, Scott James Remnant kirjoitti:
> > > One good idea would be that the screen holds at the login screen after
> > > entering your password (e.g.
On Monday 23 March 2009 9:18:59 am Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> ma, 2009-03-23 kello 11:57 +, Scott James Remnant kirjoitti:
> > One good idea would be that the screen holds at the login screen after
> > entering your password (e.g. with "Logging in...") and the desktop fades
> > in when everything'
Mike Jones wrote:
> Is there just no way for a package maintaner to not have extra work
> piled on their already hefty load while at the same time we allow a user
> of Ubuntu to remove most traces of a program in a package with multiple
> programs without having to also remove the rest of th
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 08:53 -0400, Mike Jones wrote:
> If Ubuntu said "Ok Boss" and pretended to remove one specific
> program from a package for me, through the single "add or remove
> programs to your system" interface of add/remove, that would be...
> better, but not really the best solution
On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 22:58 -0400, Paul Dufresne wrote:
> But the comment from a glibc developer:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459901#c1
> made me thinks: Hey, don't they know at glibc that this is setreuid
> that is in Posix standard,
> not setresuid!?
>
Unless I'm mistaken, you
ma, 2009-03-23 kello 11:57 +, Scott James Remnant kirjoitti:
> On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 22:25 +0100, Ernst Persson wrote:
>
> > I saw Scott removing animation from gnome login. What's the reason for
> > that? I don't see any motivation or reference to a bugreport.
> >
> There's a reference to an
Chris,
Thanks for your reply. I understand the realistic restrictions that a
developer faces when packaging applications. It really doesn't bother me
that I'm incapable of removing one out of all of them while leaving the rest
alone. I always simply remove all of them anyway. I was pointing ou
2009/3/23 Mike Jones
> Right. My intention was to say "Why in the world do I have this restriction
> on what I can and cannot have on my system?"
>
> Overall it doesn't really matter in the grand scheme of things, but in this
> specific case, it bothers me that I'm incapable of completely removin
Hello Gary,
Gary Kirkpatrick [2009-03-23 4:28 -0700]:
> I have a broadcome 4311 on an HP dv2000. I download and installed
> the b43-fwcutter_011-4ubuntu1-i386.deb. I also installed
> wl_apsta-3.130.20.0, which I think is the driver. Under hardware
> drivers it shows Broadcom B43 wireless driv
Right. My intention was to say "Why in the world do I have this restriction
on what I can and cannot have on my system?"
Overall it doesn't really matter in the grand scheme of things, but in this
specific case, it bothers me that I'm incapable of completely removing
freecell while leaving the oth
On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 22:25 +0100, Ernst Persson wrote:
> I saw Scott removing animation from gnome login. What's the reason for
> that? I don't see any motivation or reference to a bugreport.
>
There's a reference to an upstream bug report in the patch itself. It
was removed because it takes up
Morning!
I have a broadcome 4311 on an HP dv2000. I download and installed the
b43-fwcutter_011-4ubuntu1-i386.deb. I also installed wl_apsta-3.130.20.0,
which I think is the driver. Under hardware drivers it shows Broadcom B43
wireless driver enabled and not in use. Pinging produces 100%
We released bootable USB image of "OS circular" and the Debian packages of
LBCAS (LoopBack Content Addressable Storage).
OS Circular is a framework of Internet Disk Image Distributor for anonymous
operating systems. This version enables to boot "Ubuntu" or "Debian GNU Linux"
on virtual machin
Moins,
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 13:56:00 +0200
Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
> >> scsi0 : 3ware 9000 Storage Controller
> >> 3w-9xxx: scsi0: Found a 3ware 9000 Storage Controller at
> >> 0xd014, IRQ: 16.
> >> 3w-9xxx: scsi0: Firmware FE9X 2.04.00.005, BIOS BE9X 2.03.01.047,
> >> Ports: 8.
> >> Vendo
Mike Jones [2009-03-20 10:56 -0400]:
> Why exactly is it that I can't remove freecell but leave the other games?
As other people already said, you can't remove individual programs
from a package.
However, you can right-click on the app menu, "edit", and hide the
freecell program if you don't like
27 matches
Mail list logo
