On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Vincenzo Ciancia cian...@di.unipi.it wrote:
I hope this will not sound like a complaint.
It does.
The problem
is there, and it's grave.
Grave for whom? For you? For what common use cases? These are things
that are factors to consider when affecting an entire
On Wednesday 13 May 2009 2:39:16 pm Daniel Chen wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Vincenzo Ciancia cian...@di.unipi.it
wrote:
What is it doing there in a stable release? This program has not been
tested. It is not stable. People does not like it yet.
Are you seriously saying that
Il giorno gio, 14/05/2009 alle 00.11 +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs ha scritto:
Lack of Decent Latex Support?
I've switched to ubuntu because of it. I was sick of realising that
I'm missing this or that latex package. in ubuntu I did default
average (a little bit of extra math fonts)
Il giorno mer, 13/05/2009 alle 17.47 -0400, Daniel T Chen ha scritto:
Ubuntu is a community-driven distribution. Help make it as good as it
can
be. There is no I cannot, only I will not.
I tried for a while (can brag about a couple of xournal and lyx uploads)
but for me the consumed time
Am 13.05.2009 um 20:39 schrieb Daniel Chen:
There has been no lack of calls for testing. Some of these calls have
resulted in timely and effective bug reports. Others, not so much. I
doubt testers' responses have been blithely ignored.
I hope they aren't, of course. Yet, of the about 8 bugs
On Wednesday 13 May 2009 7:11:16 pm Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
Lack of Decent Latex Support?
About editors have you tried AucTeX with Speedbar and code
folding? It rocks better than anything else.
I use vim with the vim-latexsuite package installed, and it does code-folding.
