On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 2:47 PM, David MENTRE dmen...@linux-france.org wrote:
Hello Onkar,
Many thanks for you detailed explanations. It is much clearer now.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:05, Onkar Shinde onkarshi...@gmail.com wrote:
If you wish that graphviz should be built against latest ocaml
Hello Stéphane,
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 13:23, Stéphane Glondu st...@glondu.net wrote:
What about waiting for OCaml 3.11.1 (it looks like it will be out soon),
and doing the transition at the same time in Debian and Ubuntu (so that
we solve problems for 3.11.1 once and for all)?
I don't know.
Assessment of PPAs sounds to me like peer review. That would be a big
job to implement, but IMHO benefits would go far beyond a web of trust.
Of course, I'm not volunteering to do it :)
- Andrew
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
Derek Broughton wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
You've completely missed what the whole thread is about. The age old and
faulty convention is base2 for space and file sizes. That is what the
Ubuntu team wants to get rid of. But thanks for supporting my
2009/6/3 Chan Chung Hang Christopher christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk:
Now that you have yelled till you are blue in the face about disk
manufacturers using proper SI units and therefore we should although
file and filesystem space are still being calculated in base2
units...may I ask how you
Christopher,
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:16 AM, Christopher Chan
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
You're nuts.
...
What on earth is wrong with you people?
...
Geez.
Your interventions on this thread have been unnecessarily aggressive
and, at times, personal. Please have a read of the
David MENTRE wrote:
Hello Dmitrijs,
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 15:23, Dmitrijs Ledkovs dmitrij.led...@gmail.com
wrote:
Not an expert nor a DD nor anything in Ubuntu. But this could be
either a gcc4.4 transition/bug or a python2.6 et al bug.
Does exactly this package compile fine in Sid
Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
Ok can we at least fix applications to use Ki Mi etc prefixes when
they are counting in base 2?
That might actually be the best for now if there is not going to be any
public fanfare about Ubuntu taking the lead in returning to standards
and dropping convention.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Max Bowsher m...@f2s.com wrote:
Mike Jones wrote:
Do we have agreement that the correct prefixs for units that are counted
in powers of two are kibi, mebi, gibi, tebi, and so on?
Not really, no.
Some of us, myself included, are somewhat annoyed at
Mike Jones wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Max Bowsher m...@f2s.com
mailto:m...@f2s.com wrote:
Mike Jones wrote:
Do we have agreement that the correct prefixs for units that are
counted
in powers of two are kibi, mebi, gibi, tebi, and so on?
Not really, no.
I have been hesitant to add my voice to this discussion thus far, but I
think there has been some confusion as to what we are debating. There are
really two entirely separate issues at stake, and it would be nice to
clarify them.
The first issue is how various things such as disk space should be
Evan wrote:
I have been hesitant to add my voice to this discussion thus far, but
I think there has been some confusion as to what we are debating.
There are really two entirely separate issues at stake, and it would
be nice to clarify them.
The first issue is how various things such as
12 matches
Mail list logo
