Steven Susbauer wrote:
On Oct 21, 2009, at 10:56 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
Ryan Dwyer wrote:
It doesn't matter how much work is involved. Do you think the
Linux/Ubuntu community would be willing to change the way system
logons work if it meant bug #1 could be completed?
Let us see. To
Paul Smith wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 11:56 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
It doesn't matter how much work is involved. Do you think the
Linux/Ubuntu community would be willing to change the way system
logons work if it meant bug #1 could be completed?
Let us see. To change
Am 22.10.2009 um 10:02 schrieb Christopher Chan:
Mapping system? I guess that means no shared filesystems.
SMBFS, sshfs and to some extent NFS support mapping already. It works
just fine here and today, mapping volumes of a Mac OS X server onto
an Ubuntu box.
Markus
- - - - - - - - - -
On Oct 22, 2009, at 2:56 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
Steven Susbauer wrote:
On Oct 21, 2009, at 10:56 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
Ryan Dwyer wrote:
It doesn't matter how much work is involved. Do you think the
Linux/Ubuntu community would be willing to change the way system
logons work
Markus Hitter wrote:
Am 22.10.2009 um 10:02 schrieb Christopher Chan:
Mapping system? I guess that means no shared filesystems.
SMBFS, sshfs and to some extent NFS support mapping already. It works
just fine here and today, mapping volumes of a Mac OS X server onto an
Ubuntu box.
I
Steven Susbauer wrote:
On Oct 22, 2009, at 2:56 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
Steven Susbauer wrote:
On Oct 21, 2009, at 10:56 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
Ryan Dwyer wrote:
It doesn't matter how much work is involved. Do you think the
Linux/Ubuntu community would be willing to change the
There's a bunch of open source clones of Microsoft Entertainment Pack
games. I'd be sufficiently ammused by actually including them all in
Ubuntu... and maybe an Entertainment Pack option. Ubuntu would
probably better serve its users including other things, though, rather
than just an attempted
This issue is a good candidate for the (underused) Community Bug
Reporting area in Launchpad.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-community/+filebug
Can someone summarize and log it there?
Cheers,
Randall
Ubuntu Vancouver LoCo
--
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009
When can we expect to see an update to OpenOffice?
Tim
www.timscomputershop.com
CompTIA A+ Authorized Service Center
1-888-286-9284
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
This is largely a problem that exists not only with Ubuntu, but with the
Open Source Movement in general.
Last time this conversation came up, there was a large contingent of people
we wished to see a core group of a marketing team come to fruition.
Unfortunately, several of the more active
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 13:50 -0400, Tim Gelvin wrote:
When can we expect to see an update to OpenOffice?
What do you mean? There is 1:3.1.1-5ubuntu1 in Karmic already.
Chris
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Tim Gelvin timgel...@gmail.com wrote:
When can we expect to see an update to OpenOffice?
Depends on which version of Ubuntu you're talking about.
Jaunty (9.04) is already released, so the version is unlikely to change
unless a security vulnerability is found.
Whether I'm becoming old fashioned or whether I've been using Linux for
too long, I dunno. But 90% of the applications that I use are command
line driven. The only graphical apps I use on a daily basis are Firefox,
Evolution. And of course the occasional use of The Gimp, Inkscape,
Brasero, Devede
On 23/10/09 07:04, Chris Jones wrote:
But we shouldn't be encouraging the use of a GUI inside a server
environment simply because it breeds dumb users.
While I agree that users, well sysadmins (and I use the term loosely)
are getting dumber in the world, I don't think it's because of a GUI.
I don't think there's any use discussing whether we think a GUI or CLI is
better. Shouldn't we focus on what the typical business wants and what
they're prepared to use?
Although it seems that the first topic to discuss is how the uid/gid system
can be changed or mapped to support local and domain
Ryan Dwyer wrote:
I don't think there's any use discussing whether we think a GUI or CLI
is better. Shouldn't we focus on what the typical business wants and
what they're prepared to use?
You started it. :-D. BTW, please do not top post.
Although it seems that the first topic to discuss
Op vrijdag 23-10-2009 om 10:32 uur [tijdzone +1030], schreef Ryan Dwyer:
I don't think there's any use discussing whether we think a GUI or CLI
is better. Shouldn't we focus on what the typical business wants and
what they're prepared to use?
Businesses don't want a GUI per se, they want
BTW: GUI tools shouldn't run on a server, but on the admin's (or
pseudo-admin's) desktop. Using a secure connection to the server, of
course.
I take it no one has any issues with web based GUI tools? The server could
run a CLI and after installing, prompt the user to open a browser to
On 23/10/09 10:33, Ryan Dwyer wrote:
So then that brings up the question of what web based tool should be used.
Ubuntu Server has chosen eBox as that tool.
--
Onno Benschop
Connected via Bigpond NextG at S31°54'06 - E115°50'39 (Yokine, WA)
--
()/)/)()..ASCII for Onno..
|?
19 matches
Mail list logo
