Re: Ubuntu-devel-discuss Digest, Vol 59, Issue 18

2011-10-26 Thread Jeff Hanson
Lack of encryption is a security issue that's no different from any other protocol on a LAN (like NFS). If you don't trust the LAN then you tunnel the connection through SSH, VPN, etc. My major problem with scanner access is device permissions:

Re: libsane and acl group selection in udev rules

2011-10-26 Thread Jeff Hanson
Lack of encryption is a security issue that's no different from any other protocol on a LAN (like NFS). If you don't trust the LAN then you tunnel the connection through SSH, VPN, etc. My major problem with scanner access was the device permissions:

Re: libsane and acl group selection in udev rules

2011-10-26 Thread Martin Owens
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 18:32 +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote: saned exists, it should not be used to share scanners over the network because sharing scanners is a bad idea that exposes every user of said scanners to data leak by just forgetting a sensitive document inside the scanner. Also, image

Re: libsane and acl group selection in udev rules

2011-10-26 Thread LD 'Gus' Landis
Hi, I have an HP3055 which we sometimes use to scan documents. The area is private, and tough nookies if you don't like the fact that we share it locally. If the decision is to be more secure, that is fine, BUT... Please do not break current network functionality without providing clear