On 3 July 2013 15:14, Robie Basak wrote:
> It's not much good to know that an app is misbehaving. I'd like to stop
> it.
>
> Having an all-or-nothing choice, like Android, often means that apps get
> feature creep, and before you know it your apps have far more
> permissions than you'd prefer. In
Yeah. This seems like a great way to solve the problem. As I understand it this
is what Cyanogenmod is implementing and what I wondered if ubuntu would
incorporate. The cyanogenmod method shouldn't need more than one dialogue to
accomplish this.
> Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 15:14:45 +0100
> From: ro
It's not much good to know that an app is misbehaving. I'd like to stop
it.
Having an all-or-nothing choice, like Android, often means that apps get
feature creep, and before you know it your apps have far more
permissions than you'd prefer. Individually we may know that we have a
choice to not us
> Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 16:57:57 +0100
> From: m...@canonical.com
> To: ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
> Subject: Re: Privacy features in Touch (cyanogenmod)?
>
> > I agree this is a good model. Still, I worry about the possibility
> > of having a lot of "are you sure" dialogs in a nicely i
