Re: irqbalance superfluous

On Apr 9, 2015 8:20 AM, "Daniel J Blueman" wrote: > > On 9 April 2015 at 20:14, Istimsak Abdulbasir wrote: > > On Apr 9, 2015 8:09 AM, "Daniel J Blueman" wrote: > >> > >> Checked with Vivid beta on Intel i5 hardware, and it seems interrupt > >> distribution doesn't change when I boot with irqbal

Re: irqbalance superfluous

On Apr 9, 2015 8:20 AM, "John Moser" wrote: > > IRQbalance keeps all of the IRQ requests from backing up on a single > CPU. It tries to balance this out in an intelligent way accross all the > CPUs and, when possible, puts the IRQ processing as close to the process > as possible. > > On NUMA syst

Re: irqbalance superfluous

On 9 April 2015 at 20:14, Istimsak Abdulbasir wrote: > On Apr 9, 2015 8:09 AM, "Daniel J Blueman" wrote: >> >> Checked with Vivid beta on Intel i5 hardware, and it seems interrupt >> distribution doesn't change when I boot with irqbalance running [1], >> or after purging it and rebooting [2]. >>

Re: irqbalance superfluous

IRQbalance keeps all of the IRQ requests from backing up on a single CPU. It tries to balance this out in an intelligent way accross all the CPUs and, when possible, puts the IRQ processing as close to the process as possible. On NUMA systems, you may want numad. I believe irqbalance exits if it

Re: irqbalance superfluous

What is the irqbalance and what was the reason for using it? On Apr 9, 2015 8:09 AM, "Daniel J Blueman" wrote: > Checked with Vivid beta on Intel i5 hardware, and it seems interrupt > distribution doesn't change when I boot with irqbalance running [1], > or after purging it and rebooting [2]. > >

irqbalance superfluous

Checked with Vivid beta on Intel i5 hardware, and it seems interrupt distribution doesn't change when I boot with irqbalance running [1], or after purging it and rebooting [2]. Finally, it can't second guess MSI interrupt setup better than the APIC driver and adds a unnecessary layer of 'intellige

Re: Debian Continuous Integration on Ubuntu

Hey Ole, Ole Streicher [2015-04-09 11:13 +0200]: > I am curious about the CI process on Ubuntu. The web page ci.ubuntu.com > seems to play with image CI tests that are independent of the Debian > ones. Right, these are for Ubuntu desktop/server/touch images, which are Ubuntu specific. > Are the

Debian Continuous Integration on Ubuntu

Hi, I am curious about the CI process on Ubuntu. The web page ci.ubuntu.com seems to play with image CI tests that are independent of the Debian ones. Are the Debian Continuous Integration tests run during Ubuntu development as well, or is this planned? If yes, how can on