John,
Do you mean to do away with limits in GNU linux on the basis that it is
weak security ?
Nobody I know has ever claimed it was anything but weak security. As you
point
out as security goes, it does not get you very far beyond keeping yr
box(es) a little
under control when they are at the
I really did not intend my suggestion to be a thermonuclear device.
I take yr comments seriously though; you have a point. That said, the
(perhaps weak) rationale behind introducing "group negation" in the
`pam_limits`
syntax is certainly not muddying waters, but rather change default
values for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martinx - ジェームズ wrote on 23/02/16 06:47:
> ...
>
> On 22 February 2016 at 07:20, Matthew Paul Thomas
>>
>> Ramon Marquez wrote on 16/02/16 19:42:
>>>
>>> Caffeine is a package very important cause inhibits the screen
>>> for playing videos on the w
