On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 15:01 -0700, Markus Lankeit wrote:
> Adding my $0.02...
>
> If you pick "samba file server" during install, libnss-winbind
> libpam-winbind are not installed by default. It took me a long to
> time to track down why in 16.04 I can "join" an AD domain just fine,
> but domain
I like John's idea too, but I also don't like the simple appearance of
a system thrown together so extemporaneously that a simple "power user"
could fix the bugs. The hibernation is what really makes me irritated
by Ubuntu. I know, I read some posts from Linux Torvalds on the
subject. Howeve
On 19.07.2016 [15:01:46 -0700], Markus Lankeit wrote:
> Adding my $0.02...
>
> If you pick "samba file server" during install, libnss-winbind
> libpam-winbind are not installed by default. It took me a long to time to
> track down why in 16.04 I can "join" an AD domain just fine, but domain
> use
Adding my $0.02...
If you pick "samba file server" during install, libnss-winbind
libpam-winbind are not installed by default. It took me a long to time
to track down why in 16.04 I can "join" an AD domain just fine, but
domain users get "access denied" to samba file shares. Not sure the
log
John Moser schreef op 19-07-2016 23:48:
What Ubuntu needs most is a simple, non-buried toggle option to show
the boot process--including displaying the bootloader, displaying the
kernel load messages, and listing which services are loading and
already-loaded during the graphical boot. Ubuntu's
On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 14:29 -0700, Jason Benjamin wrote:
> I've been irritated by so many obvious shortcomings of Ubuntu this
> version (16.04). So many of the most obvious fixes are easily
> attributed to configuration files. I don't know if those who
> purchase the operating system directly fro
I've been irritated by so many obvious shortcomings of Ubuntu this
version (16.04). So many of the most obvious fixes are easily
attributed to configuration files. I don't know if those who purchase
the operating system directly from Canonical versus a download are
having to deal with the sam
Hello,
it would be nice if I could use the proxy protocol with exim on ubuntu.
The feature is not experimental anymore. Are there any plans to include
it? I couldn't find any informations about this.
Regards
Kim
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify s
