On 8 October 2016 at 23:58, Xen wrote:
> Colin Law schreef op 08-10-2016 18:29:
>>
>> On 8 October 2016 at 17:21, Xen wrote:
>>>
>>> Ralf Mardorf schreef op 06-10-2016 12:42:
Just a very laste note.
On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 22:29 +0200, Xen wrote:
>
>
> >> In Win
Colin Law schreef op 09-10-2016 9:28:
On 8 October 2016 at 23:58, Xen wrote:
Colin Law schreef op 08-10-2016 18:29:
On 8 October 2016 at 17:21, Xen wrote:
Ralf Mardorf schreef op 06-10-2016 12:42:
Just a very laste note.
On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 22:29 +0200, Xen wrote:
>> In Windows
Y
On 9 October 2016 at 12:56, Xen wrote:
> Colin Law schreef op 09-10-2016 9:28:
>> ...
>> I was not commenting on any particular topic, merely pointing out that
>> that Ralf (I think) said there are some things that Linux "does not
>> allow" and you answered this with a post referring to things tha
I didn't read all your trolling, however, what I already read is
simply stupid. Users by default cannot use sudo to get user privileges
for good reasons. The Ubuntu default should be, that just the first
user, with the ID 1000, is able to get root privileges by sudo. On a
multi-user system it's no
On Sun, 9 Oct 2016 15:05:59 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>Users by default cannot use sudo to get user privileges
>for good reasons. ^
^superuser ;)
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify setting
Colin Law schreef op 09-10-2016 14:38:
On 9 October 2016 at 12:56, Xen wrote:
Colin Law schreef op 09-10-2016 9:28:
...
I was not commenting on any particular topic, merely pointing out
that
that Ralf (I think) said there are some things that Linux "does not
allow" and you answered this with
On 9 October 2016 at 15:43, Xen wrote:
> Colin Law schreef op 09-10-2016 14:38:
>>
>> On 9 October 2016 at 12:56, Xen wrote:
>>>
>>> Colin Law schreef op 09-10-2016 9:28:
...
I was not commenting on any particular topic, merely pointing out that
that Ralf (I think) said there
Ralf Mardorf schreef op 09-10-2016 15:05:
I didn't read all your trolling,
If you are going to call other people trolls for having different
opinions, do you then still expect your own opinions to be respected by
those people, or by other people in general?
however, what I already read is
Colin Law schreef op 09-10-2016 16:48:
On 9 October 2016 at 15:43, Xen wrote:
Colin Law schreef op 09-10-2016 14:38:
On 9 October 2016 at 12:56, Xen wrote:
Colin Law schreef op 09-10-2016 9:28:
...
I was not commenting on any particular topic, merely pointing out
that
that Ralf (I thin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 09/10/16 17:32, Xen wrote:
> The same is true with mounting samba shares, it is not possible
> with any degree of ease, today. Of course, I want to work on it,
> but I can't do everything alone, or at the same time.
I'll just leave this here (cop
Daniel Llewellyn schreef op 09-10-2016 19:07:
On 09/10/16 17:32, Xen wrote:
The same is true with mounting samba shares, it is not possible
with any degree of ease, today. Of course, I want to work on it,
but I can't do everything alone, or at the same time.
I'll just leave this here (copy+pas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
OK, I'll bite..
On 09/10/16 18:26, Xen wrote:
> Daniel Llewellyn schreef op 09-10-2016 19:07: These are not
> consistently mounted, is what I was talking about. You will have to
> go to that mount point (browse to that network share) every time
> yo
Hi,
this time I read your complete mail, I just didn't watch the video.
A very last reply from me.
If you notice, that low level software requires improvement, you could
assume that this isn't something Ubuntu developers could change. A
feature request send to upstream makes more sense, than a d
I have noticed a couple of bugs in the Networking options.
The bugs appear mostly after setting up a Wireless AP connection.
The network menu in the Indicators area just doesn't display any other
wifi connections available when the AP is disabled.
The 'connect to Hidden Networks' option when us
Daniel Llewellyn schreef op 09-10-2016 19:39:
OK, I'll bite..
On 09/10/16 18:26, Xen wrote:
Daniel Llewellyn schreef op 09-10-2016 19:07: These are not
consistently mounted, is what I was talking about. You will have to
go to that mount point (browse to that network share) every time
you reboot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 09/10/16 19:53, Xen wrote:
> I am pretty sure that any application that does not support GVFS
> will not see those mounts so easily. You will have to symlink them
> and that defeats the purpose of the system in a certain sense.
> There is no defau
Ralf Mardorf schreef op 09-10-2016 20:12:
Hi,
this time I read your complete mail, I just didn't watch the video.
A very last reply from me.
If you notice, that low level software requires improvement, you could
assume that this isn't something Ubuntu developers could change. A
feature request
Daniel Llewellyn schreef op 09-10-2016 21:17:
On 09/10/16 19:53, Xen wrote:
I am pretty sure that any application that does not support GVFS
will not see those mounts so easily. You will have to symlink them
and that defeats the purpose of the system in a certain sense.
There is no default syste
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 09/10/16 20:17, Daniel Llewellyn wrote:
> On 09/10/16 19:53, Xen wrote: As a feature request that you could
> try to get implemented by the gnome guys you could suggest to their
> issue-tracker that gvfs support KIO-slaves. Also would be worth
> s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 09/10/16 20:35, Xen wrote:
> Personally I think SystemD is lower level and in that sense more
> dependable and more broad...ly available. It might not do the same
> things but... at least it is something both parties could use.
Well, I would lo
Daniel Llewellyn schreef op 09-10-2016 21:37:
On 09/10/16 20:17, Daniel Llewellyn wrote:
On 09/10/16 19:53, Xen wrote: As a feature request that you could
try to get implemented by the gnome guys you could suggest to their
issue-tracker that gvfs support KIO-slaves. Also would be worth
suggestin
Daniel Llewellyn schreef op 09-10-2016 21:43:
On 09/10/16 20:35, Xen wrote:
Personally I think SystemD is lower level and in that sense more
dependable and more broad...ly available. It might not do the same
things but... at least it is something both parties could use.
Well, I would love a Sy
22 matches
Mail list logo
