On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 18:29, Bernd Schubert wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/9/22 18:38, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>
> >> We are in the process to upstream out changes. We got disrupted by other
> >> work for our main product but will continue to send new patches soon.
> >> However, as expected getting the
On 8/9/22 18:38, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
We are in the process to upstream out changes. We got disrupted by other
work for our main product but will continue to send new patches soon.
However, as expected getting the patches upstream takes time, which is
replacing the module might be
On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 12:25 PM Dimitri John Ledkov
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 18:20, Aaron Rainbolt wrote:
> >
> > On my system, if the initrd isn't readable by the kernel, it results
> > in a kernel panic. Is that to be expected despite inird-less boot? Or
> > is that an
Hi,
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 18:20, Aaron Rainbolt wrote:
>
> On my system, if the initrd isn't readable by the kernel, it results
> in a kernel panic. Is that to be expected despite inird-less boot? Or
> is that an indicator that at least Lubuntu (and probably Ubuntu
> Desktop) does use an initrd?
On 8/9/22 19:08, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 17:53, Richard Laager wrote:
On 8/9/22 11:38, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
The fast majority of Ubuntu installations boot without initramfs at
all.
What makes you say this? Every Ubuntu system I've ever installed has an
Bah, sent directly to a Canonical employee rather than a mailing list.
Why does Gmail keep doing this? grr...
-- Forwarded message -
From: Aaron Rainbolt
Date: Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 12:18 PM
Subject: Re: Ubuntu initramfs (Was: Re: any reason for CONFIG_FUSE_FS=y)
To: Dimitri John
On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 12:35 PM 罗瑶明 wrote:
>
> Hi, Dear Oliveira,
> Thanks very much for your reply. I think you get my point, according to your
> guidance，
> I found the link https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TechnicalBoard mention the following:
>
> but no more details about how to select.:)
You're
Hi,
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 17:53, Richard Laager wrote:
>
> On 8/9/22 11:38, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > The fast majority of Ubuntu installations boot without initramfs at
> > all.
>
> What makes you say this? Every Ubuntu system I've ever installed has an
> initrd.img-KERNEL_VERSION in
On 8/9/22 11:38, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
The fast majority of Ubuntu installations boot without initramfs at
all.
What makes you say this? Every Ubuntu system I've ever installed has an
initrd.img-KERNEL_VERSION in /boot. In this context, I'm talking about
systems installed using the
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 16:24, Bernd Schubert wrote:
>
> Hi Dimitri,
>
> On 8/9/22 15:54, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 14:22, Bernd Schubert
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I would like to ask if there is a good reason Ubuntu builds fuse as
> >>
Hi Dimitri,
On 8/9/22 15:54, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 14:22, Bernd Schubert wrote:
Hello,
I would like to ask if there is a good reason Ubuntu builds fuse as
statically into the kernel instead of using a module?
Reason I'm asking is that we are currently
Heya,
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 15:30, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm not directly involved with this in general, but if I understand
> the question and some processes correctly:
>
> The package versions in a given Ubuntu release are (usually) a result
> of a Time Based Release
Hi,
I'm not directly involved with this in general, but if I understand
the question and some processes correctly:
The package versions in a given Ubuntu release are (usually) a result
of a Time Based Release process
and what package versions are in Ubuntu's and Debian's package
archives; and
Hi,
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 14:22, Bernd Schubert wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to ask if there is a good reason Ubuntu builds fuse as
> statically into the kernel instead of using a module?
>
> Reason I'm asking is that we are currently working on a couple of fuse
> improvements and
>
> a) A
Hello,
I would like to ask if there is a good reason Ubuntu builds fuse as
statically into the kernel instead of using a module?
Reason I'm asking is that we are currently working on a couple of fuse
improvements and
a) A static module makes development a bit harder, I cannot take any
15 matches
Mail list logo
