On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 07:36 +0200, Aurélien Naldi wrote:
Hi,
when using Drag and Drop, nautilus switches from GIO/GVFS URI to local
path, depending on the drop target (i.e. it will paste a local path if
you drop to a gnome-terminal). I guess dropping on a gtk filechooser
assumes that the
openoffice.org-presentation (Impress) currently depends on it. Assuming
we would be keeping that on the CD it would need to be tested to see if
the libraries in the draw package are needed by Impress to function,
which I am pretty certain they are needed. In that case we would have to
split them
On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 01:05 +0100, Shane Fagan wrote:
On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 18:28 -0500, Chris Cheney wrote:
openoffice.org-presentation (Impress) currently depends on it. Assuming
we would be keeping that on the CD it would need to be tested to see if
the libraries in the draw package
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 11:40 -0500, Tom H wrote:
Everybody knows that a terminal has white text on black background.
Windows has a terminal like this. Mac OS X have a terminal like this.
OS X's terminal is a very civilized black text on white background...
True, funny enough their terminal
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 21:23 +0100, Remco wrote:
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 17:40, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
Ugh. I really thought that only primitive systems use white text on a black
background. It's ergonomically very bad. I never use such a terminal
except in Windows, where I haven't
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 17:13 -0600, Patrick Goetz wrote:
I've been out of the loop for a couple of months, so pardon me if this
has already been discussed, but Karmic got thoroughly trashed in a
TomsHardware.com review:
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ubuntu-karmic-koala,2484.html
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 22:53 -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 17:13 -0600, Patrick Goetz wrote:
I've been out of the loop for a couple of months, so pardon me if this
has already been discussed, but Karmic got thoroughly trashed in a
TomsHardware.com review:
http
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 13:50 -0400, Tim Gelvin wrote:
When can we expect to see an update to OpenOffice?
What do you mean? There is 1:3.1.1-5ubuntu1 in Karmic already.
Chris
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
The issue you are talking about appears to be this:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/244353
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440055
Chris
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 16:27 +0200, Stefan Kachaunov wrote:
Hello!
I am writing to you because I (as well as
On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 13:57 +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 08:13 +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote:
TBH, I just bursted into a laugh attackfor easyiness: 500 Gigabytes
as written on a Harddrive label are not the same as 500 Gigabytes
transfered over the Network
From an email from Colin Watson:
==
The partitioner has done this since November 2005.
partman-partitioning (37) unstable; urgency=low
[...]
[ Frans Pop ]
* Use gpt instead of msdos disklabel for disks larger than 2TB.
[...]
-- Frans Pop f...@debian.org Sun, 27 Nov 2005 20:19:17 +0100
==
On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 12:38 +0100, Markus Hitter wrote:
This is likely all true, but with resolution independent rendering,
it no longer applies. In the future, px is just a measurement unit,
just like in or mm. Once the software gets this, it's perfectly
fine for web developers to ask
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 02:55 -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2009/02/26 21:12 (GMT-0600) Chris Cheney composed:
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 21:08 -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2009/02/26 19:15 (GMT-0600) Chris Cheney composed:
On 26/02/09 14:31, Felix Miata wrote:
Real-world DPI has been
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 16:28 +, (``-_-´´) -- BUGabundo wrote:
Olá Mackenzie e a todos.
On Thursday 26 February 2009 18:59:28 Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
I have a 1280x800 13 screen, and the fonts look fine to me.
Hi have a 13 at 1280x800 (DPI 112 according to xorg log) and I have to
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 13:55 -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2009/02/27 10:09 (GMT-0600) Chris Cheney composed:
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 02:55 -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
These may not be the best around, but even if they're off by 50%, the real
world still hasn't been anywhere near constant
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 21:15 +0100, Siegfried-Angel wrote:
2009/2/26 Chris Cheney cche...@ubuntu.com:
[...] personally I think they are already fine [...]
I don't agree. Having fonts as displayed in
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23152448/10pt.jpg is clearly not right
and would make, IMHO
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 17:33 -0600, Ryan Hayle wrote:
On 26/02/09 14:31, Felix Miata wrote:
On the contrary, preference is about the difference between acceptable and
unacceptable.
There are two separate issues here. You seem to be arguing that the OLD
size is too small, and want
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 21:08 -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2009/02/26 19:15 (GMT-0600) Chris Cheney composed:
On 26/02/09 14:31, Felix Miata wrote:
Real-world DPI has been steadily increasing from release to
release.
I don't see this to actually be the case. Even with laptops
Even if Alt+SysRq+K does work for you it will likely cause your console
(eg Alt F1-F6) to not work again until reboot, because it doesn't
cleanly shut down the xserver like C-A-B does. I used it once recently
after C-A-B was disabled by default and it worked well enough to get X
back but after
I maintain OOo for Ubuntu.
The OpenOffice.org in Ubuntu is the go-oo.org version.
go-oo takes the original sun tarballs then patches it heavily with
somewhere around 500 patches. Pretty much all Linux distributions use
the go-oo.org build system and patches, except for Fedora, which just
takes a
On Tue, 2008-12-30 at 08:46 -0500, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
On Mon, 2008-12-29 at 16:48 -0500, John Moser wrote:
I was considering filing a bug for package request or creating a spec
for Go-Ooo.org for inclusion in Ubuntu, or possibly as a replacement
for OpenOffice.org vanilla. Start-up
On Sun, 2008-12-28 at 12:03 +0100, Markus Hitter wrote:
Am 28.12.2008 um 07:49 schrieb Chris Cheney:
Thus it would take a very long time to download for a large
percentage of the world. Although perhaps this is not as big an
issue since many places have a bandwidth cap as well so
On Sat, 2008-12-27 at 16:47 +, richard wrote:
-snip-
He knows that if he buys a copy of windows 1 CD maybe 2
-snip-
Windows is a DVD now
MacOS is a DVD as well
Perhaps its time to move the default Ubuntu release to a DVD also. ;-)
If I remember correctly the main reason it hasn't been so
John,
2.6.28 will come out around January and Jaunty will probably ship with
2.6.29 but it very well might not be a good idea to use it by default
for Jaunty which is what shirish seemed to be talking about. Just
because it is not considered development status doesn't necessarily mean
it is
On Sat, 2008-09-27 at 11:53 +0300, Timo Jyrinki wrote:
2008/9/5 Chris Cheney [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
released on Sept 8 which puts the final release around Oct 20. That
doesn't leave enough time to make it even marginally stable, since that
would be only 3 days before the Intrepid release
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 19:22 -0500, Tony Yarusso wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Chris Cheney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 11:30 +0530, Vishal Rao wrote:
What is the latest status of the possibility of including OOo 3 and FF
3.1 by default in Intrepid
On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 11:30 +0530, Vishal Rao wrote:
What is the latest status of the possibility of including OOo 3 and FF
3.1 by default in Intrepid?
OpenOffice.org 3.0 will be in Intrepid but it is looking like it will
not be as the primary version that is installed by default. The release
27 matches
Mail list logo
