Don't hold back, John. Tell us how you really feel.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 1:30 PM, John Moser wrote:
> Shut up. You're whining like a raving politicized lune and nobody is
> listening to your monologue.
>
> Apply some critical thinking skills. It's a bug in a special mode of a
> browser, a mo
nst file for the package. It downloads the stable 32
bit version from archive.canonical, and then wraps it with
nspluginwapper. Are you sure you didn't already install 64 alpha
before doing that comparison?
Joe Terranova
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.
someone starts emailing people's
bosses about them, things have gone a bit too far. I emailed the
person who first posted to tell them they were making a mountain out
of a mole hill, but it didn't seem to stick.
Joe Terranova
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@li
ing them
compiz.
On the other hand, I'd be for letting people choose whether to enable
compiz on install, instead of waiting until they startup the machine
and go to appearance. Novice users might never know there's a way to
turn off the fancy effects.
Joe Terranova
[1] http://linux.sla
needs to get done, regularly.
I am, of course, happy to help in any way I can.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asterisk_(PBX)
Sincerely,
Joe Terranova
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
e giving Go-Ooo.org a try. Their site claims that their
spreadsheet formulas are more compatible with Excel, which was my
mother's biggest complaint about Open Office. I'm intrigued, but I
think it should be put up for consideration for Jaunty+1, or at the
most packaged beside Open Office fo
th the LiveCD and
main install (possibly alongside Firefox). I understand if developers
need to wait for Jaunty to make this move; however, I believe this
should be the policy, both for Firefox (tm) and any other packages
that become non-free software.
Joe Terranova
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
>> Why would it be an oval?
> it wouldnt if usplash would act like you describe below (which it doesnt)
> to achieve what you describe usplash needs code changes and someon who
> actually does them :)
We were already at that point. You were responding to Alexander's
post, which already recognized
> you miss the point a bit here, even in that case the logo would be oval
> instead of being a cycle, it's about the stretching that happens
Why would it be an oval?
a 300x200 logo
on a 800x600 monitor, an 800x600 black background is generated, and
the 300x200 logo overlaid on it (placed ac
Are there problems with us.archive.ubuntu.com , or does it seriously
need an upgrade?
Every new version, it's unusable for weeks -- as of today, it's still
unusable. I'm tired of having to change my sources.list to a different
country every time there's a new version.
C
ot be possible, but hopefully there's something similar that can be
done without much MOTU effort, if they thought this was worth it.
Joe Terranova
PS: I use the Wine repo too. But after the latest update, running wine
turns my screen black, and I don't know what to do about it.
--
11 matches
Mail list logo
