Fwd: e1000e nvm checksum bug presence?

Hello. My question is simple. Is this bug <https://superuser.com/questions/1104537/how-to-repair-the-checksum-of-the-non-volatile-memory-nvm-of-intel-ethernet-co> still present in current versions of ubuntu(LTS and Non-LTS)? Thanks for your answer. Andriy. -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailin

Bug#817302: marked as done (openjdk-6: Removal of dh_desktop)

Your message dated Mon, 23 Jan 2017 16:59:33 +0200 with message-id <20170123145933.wkuzox72oojbut3b@localhost> and subject line This has been fixed in 6b39-1.13.11-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #817302, regarding openjdk-6: Removal of dh_desktop to be marked as done. This means th

blender bug

In My Ubuntu the Blender has a bug. By maximizing and start to spin the object in 3D The screen begin flash. To help, the exit of the my lshw: reginaldo-desktop description: Desktop Computer product: To Be Filled By O.E.M. (To Be Filled By O.E.M.) vendor: To Be Filled By O.E.M

Re: Bug in python-wxgtk3.0 using DisplayCAL

Hi Will, >I have been attempting to calibrate my monitor using DisplayCAL. >Have informed the DisplayCAL developer Florian Höch > but he insists it is a bug >within python-wxgtk3.0. sudo apt install dispcalgui displaycal works here, on both xenial amd64 and trusty amd64 (chroot

Bug in python-wxgtk3.0 using DisplayCAL

Dear Ubuntu Developers I have been attempting to calibrate my monitor using DisplayCAL. Have informed the DisplayCAL developer Florian Höch but he insists it is a bug within python-wxgtk3.0. Unfortunately get this output: will:~/colour_testing$ displaycal Traceback (most recent call last

Re: Bug in ubuntu package for Mailman

Hi Christian Yes, you have correctly identified the diff. Just to make sure I understand correctly, you want me to mark the *Mailman* bug that I linked to as New again? I don't want to get yelled at by the GNU Mailman people if I'm doing the wrong thing :) Regards Philip On 18 Nov

Re: Bug in ubuntu package for Mailman

d correctly, you want me to mark the >> *Mailman* bug that I linked to as New again? >> > > I'll try to clarify. > The linked bug is a mailman bug you are right on that. > What has to be done is to add an Ubuntu Task for the versions affected - > in this case only

Re: Bug in ubuntu package for Mailman

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Philip Colmer wrote: > Just to make sure I understand correctly, you want me to mark the > *Mailman* bug that I linked to as New again? > I'll try to clarify. The linked bug is a mailman bug you are right on that. What has to be done is to add

Re: Bug in ubuntu package for Mailman

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Philip Colmer wrote: > It looks as if https://bugs.launchpad.net/mailman/+bug/1251495 has not > been applied to the ubuntu package for Mailman. I have checked both > 1:2.1.16-2ubuntu0.2 and 1:2.1.16-2, and Tagger.py has the bug in it. > Hand-altering

Bug in ubuntu package for Mailman

Hi It looks as if https://bugs.launchpad.net/mailman/+bug/1251495 has not been applied to the ubuntu package for Mailman. I have checked both 1:2.1.16-2ubuntu0.2 and 1:2.1.16-2, and Tagger.py has the bug in it. Hand-altering the file to implement the fix does correct the problem. This is a high

Bug#832719: this patch doesn't work

Control: retitle -1 dangling src.zip symlink the proposed patch doesn't work, because the src package is a binary independent package. -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-d

Bug#834718: choreonoid: maintainer address bounces

Hello, On 1 November 2016 at 04:01, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:21:27AM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > > Source: choreonoid > > Version: 1.5.0+dfsg-0.1 > > Severity: serious > > Justification: Policy §3.3 > > > > I tried to re

Should Broadcom wifi drivers be unloaded before suspend to avoid connetivity issues? And the appopriate importance of that problem? (bug #1439771)

Hi, I am asking if it would be a good idea for Ubuntu to have Broadcom WLAN drivers to unload before going to sleep as a default configuration? Not doing that seems to cause networks to disappear on many systems. Or would my workaround cause some other serious issues? There is a bug report on

Re: Bug on Grafana package on ubuntu 16.04

On 13.09.2016 [19:13:02 +], Thomas Fragstein wrote: > Hello, > > > there is a bug on the grafana package on ubuntu 16.04. > > the simple bugfix are that icons are missing on the webpage of grafana. > > a longer description can be found there > https://github

Re: Bug on Grafana package on ubuntu 16.04

On 13/09/16 20:13, Thomas Fragstein wrote: > Hello, > > > there is a bug on the grafana package on ubuntu 16.04. > > the simple bugfix are that icons are missing on the webpage of grafana. > > a longer description can be found > there https://github.com/grafana/gra

Bug on Grafana package on ubuntu 16.04

Hello, there is a bug on the grafana package on ubuntu 16.04. the simple bugfix are that icons are missing on the webpage of grafana. a longer description can be found there https://github.com/grafana/grafana/issues/4712 so my question. Its a known bug on ubuntu site? regards Thomas

Re: How to get Supervisor bug in Ubuntu 16.04 LTS fixed?

On 2016-09-08 00:13, Peter Odding wrote: > I'm willing to back port the minimal changes required to have correct > maintainer scripts generated :-) Great! > but I wouldn't know how to actually get the changes into a released > version of Ubuntu... Please see

How to get Supervisor bug in Ubuntu 16.04 LTS fixed?

eturned). Shortly after trying out Ubuntu 16.04 I found out that the Supervisor daemon is no longer automatically enabled nor is it started during installation. This breaks compatibility with previous and expected behavior. In June '16 I reported this issue as a bug against the supervisor p

Re: Purge bug for nagios3

On 02.09.2016 [16:27:30 +0200], g...@free.fr wrote: > > Hi, > > I think you have a bug in the purge procedure for nagios3. I think you might be right :) > I use Linux Mint 17.2 using ubuntu packages. > > I installed nagios3 (sudo apt-get install nagios3), tested, and de

Purge bug for nagios3

Hi, I think you have a bug in the purge procedure for nagios3. I use Linux Mint 17.2 using ubuntu packages. I installed nagios3 (sudo apt-get install nagios3), tested, and decided not to use it. I so uninstalled nagios3 using purge (sudo apt-get purge nagios3). I don't remember some sp

A bug in opencryptoki?

the intended usage of the pkcs11 tools correctly, this is a bug/misconfiguration. Best regards, Greg -- Greg Staniak Systems and Devops Engineer Metail -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss

ImageJ launch bug

Dears, There is a bug for launching imageJ in Ubuntu 16.04 LTS: ~$ imagej Open other images in this ImageJ panel as follows: imagej -p 1 [ ... ] No JVM found to run ImageJ Please apt-get install a JVM to run ImageJ or set JAVA_HOME if it's not a JVM from a Debian Package. update

xfce4-power-manager BUG + possible FIX

Dear maintainer(s), first time I try to give some feedback, so please don't feel offended, or even beat me, if this is not the right place to report. PACKAGE === Package: xfce4-power-manager Version: 1.4.4-4ubuntu2 PROBLEM DESCRIPTION === Running xfce4-power-manager on a l

Re: Timeout Bug in openvpn-auth-ldap Package causing OpenVPN to Crash

Hi Robbie, Thanks for the feedback, it was very informative! I have created the following bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvpn-auth-ldap/+bug/1602813 I have also created this PPA to host a full debdiff: https://launchpad.net/~foxpass/+archive/ubuntu/openvpn-auth-ldap

Re: Timeout Bug in openvpn-auth-ldap Package causing OpenVPN to Crash

Hi Aaron, Thank you for your contribution! Please make sure a bug exists for this issue in Launchpad and that your patch is attached there. This way other developers and users have a single place to communicate about this problem and track progress. A patch just on this mailing list is likely to

Timeout Bug in openvpn-auth-ldap Package causing OpenVPN to Crash

Hello, There is a timeout bug in the openvpn-auth-ldap package that causes OpenVPN to crash when the network timeout is exceeded. You can see this bug referenced here: https://github.com/threerings/openvpn-auth-ldap/issues/11 And the fix mentioned here: https://github.com/threerings/openvpn

Re: Vagrant Bug is fixed on Debian, please, sync it with Xenial...

On 2016-05-19 03:12, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote: > On 18 May 2016 at 20:02, Nish Aravamudan > <mailto:nish.aravamu...@canonical.com>> wrote: >> On 18.05.2016 [19:51:43 -0400], Martinx - ジェームズ wrote: >>> Can someone, please, close this bug: >>> >>> h

Re: Vagrant Bug is fixed on Debian, please, sync it with Xenial...

On 18 May 2016 at 20:02, Nish Aravamudan wrote: > On 18.05.2016 [19:51:43 -0400], Martinx - ジェームズ wrote: > > Guys, > > > > Can someone, please, close this bug: > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vagrant/+bug/1559420 > > > > The fix i

Re: Vagrant Bug is fixed on Debian, please, sync it with Xenial...

On 18.05.2016 [19:51:43 -0400], Martinx - ジェームズ wrote: > Guys, > > Can someone, please, close this bug: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vagrant/+bug/1559420 > > The fix is already available on Debian. That's not how SRU works? https://wiki.ubunt

Vagrant Bug is fixed on Debian, please, sync it with Xenial...

Guys, Can someone, please, close this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vagrant/+bug/1559420 The fix is already available on Debian. Thanks, Thiago -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https

BUG: libGeoIP.a no functions exported

Hi Support, It appears there is something wrong with your static libraries. There doesn't seem to be any functions exported. --- gcc -Wall -DCORES=2 -DHTHREADS=4 -static -o monicap-2x4 monicap.cpp monicap-api.cpp monicap-capture.cpp monicap-chomp.cpp -L/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGeoIP.

Re: serious xfwm4 bug fixed last May, but still not in xenial

No it is not in Debian Stretch or Sid and I have alerted them (yesterday): https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819228 On 03/25/2016 04:46 PM, Simon Quigley wrote: Is the fix in Debian Stretch or Sid? If not, you should also alert the maintainers there. I understand that

Re: serious xfwm4 bug fixed last May, but still not in xenial

Is the fix in Debian Stretch or Sid? If not, you should also alert the maintainers there. I understand that because it's an urgent fix, this may not be ideal, but it's something to consider. Simon Quigley tsimo...@ubuntu.com tsimonq2 on Freenode -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-

serious xfwm4 bug fixed last May, but still not in xenial

There is a serious bug in previous versions of xfwm4, the XFCE4 window manager, which has the result that clicking on the menu bar to move a window of a KDE app causes the window manager to hang forever, requiring the user to kill the X session or reboot. This has been reported numerous time (see

Re: [PATCH] Please fix squid3 bug #3769 and squid3 trusty package bug 1405351 in trusty

Hi, thanks! I've reformatted the patch and put it in my PPA. Could you please fill out the test case and regression potential sections of the bug report? I don't know enough about squid3 to do that. Cheers, mwh On 24 March 2016 at 03:21, Lukas Erlacher wrote: > Hi, > > th

Re: [PATCH] Please fix squid3 bug #3769 and squid3 trusty package bug 1405351 in trusty

Hi, there was no bug so I made one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid3/+bug/1561007 Best, Luke -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss

Re: [PATCH] Please fix squid3 bug #3769 and squid3 trusty package bug 1405351 in trusty

Hi Lukas, Thank you for providing these patches. Please can you ensure that a bug exists on Launchpad for each that describes the problems? That will help everyone involved track getting these fixed. I see that the second one you mentioned already has a bug. Does the first? Robie -- Ubuntu

[PATCH] Please fix squid3 bug #3769 and squid3 trusty package bug 1405351 in trusty

Hello, (Note: I have written this email directly to Luigi Gangitano a couple days ago who is the package maintainer according to squid-proxy.org but haven't heard back from him, so I'm posting to the list now) in all versions of squid3 between 3.2 and 3.4.4 a pretty severe bug e

IPv6 DHCPv6 bug #1543352 in Ubuntu 16.04

Hi, Sorry for coming to the list with this, but I would like to get some attention for bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1543352 I already worked with upstream to get this fixed and that has been done: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/ifupdown.git/commit

Bug Report: libpam-cgfs - Admin Privileges lost in UI

Package: libpam_cgfs Version: 2.0.0~rc5-0ubuntu1~ubuntu14.04.1~ppa1 Host Version: Ubuntu 14.04 fully patched Source of the package: http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-lxc/lxd-stable/ubuntu Hey guys - quick report on a pretty bad regression in libpam_cgfs. Effect: Total loss of admin privileges in

Big Bug on Ubuntu Mate 16.04 : CPU 100% with gvfsd-smb-browse process

Hello, Sorry i don't no speak english very good (i'm french), i have a big bug on Ubuntu Mate 16.04 on my laptop with, the cpu process is 100% load. (with RJ45 ethernet) cf capture : http://nsa37.casimages.com/img/2016/03/13/160313034108614233.jpg Please dev, upgrade gvfs p

Re: Fix for "python-mysqldb" bug

> > Hi Chris, > > Please keep the list in Cc so that others can benefit from this > conversation as well. I've re-added it. > >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 12:26:02PM -0330, Chris Ringrose wrote: >> I also found a well known bug that exists in Python mysqldb that was

Re: Fix for "python-mysqldb" bug

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 02:26:39PM -0330, Chris Ringrose wrote: > (Because I'm not a member, I got an email that I don't have the right > to message that list.) You can, messages are just moderated to avoid spam. This conversation is absolutely on-topic for the list and the moderators will let it

Re: Fix for "python-mysqldb" bug

Hi Chris, Please keep the list in Cc so that others can benefit from this conversation as well. I've re-added it. On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 12:26:02PM -0330, Chris Ringrose wrote: > I also found a well known bug that exists in Python mysqldb that was also > crashing my Ubuntu system.

Re: Fix for "python-mysqldb" bug

Hi Chris, On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 03:20:21PM -0330, Chris Ringrose wrote: > Hi there: > > We've discovered a bug in the following package, and devised a fix: > > Package: python-mysqldb > Architecture: amd64 > Version: 1.3.4-2 > Filenam

Fix for "python-mysqldb" bug

Hi there: We've discovered a bug in the following package, and devised a fix: Package: python-mysqldb Architecture: amd64 Version: 1.3.4-2 Filename: pool/main/p/python-mysqldb/python-mysqldb_1.3.4-2_amd64.deb The bug is serious, as it kills execution

Bug#810441: libopenobex: please switch to libusb 1.0

Package: libopenobex Version: 1.7.1-3 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, libopenobex has a build-depends on libusb-dev. A few years ago upstream has released a new major version libusb 1.0 with a different API which aims to fix design deficiencies with USB 2.0 and 3.0 in mind. The old libusb 0.

Re: How shall I report a bug in the .deb packaging itself?

Ralf Mardorf: ls -hAl/var/log/apt/ Thank you, that is very useful. Using the GNOME System Log application I searched for something like this before starting this conversation, but the apt logs were not listed there. Do you thing this should be reported as a bug? smime.p7s Description

Re: How shall I report a bug in the .deb packaging itself?

On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 19:03:16 +0100, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: >Ralf Mardorf: > > Seemingly you can't provide new arguments, so you should expect to > > get the same replies and perhaps some subscribers consider it as > > trolling or spamming, so that they don't read mails of this thread > > any

Re: How shall I report a bug in the .deb packaging itself?

Russ Allbery: > I think it's correctly doing what it should in the situation > described in this thread. Okay, so what I said is what I saw. And deciding if it is true or not has always been your choice. Ralf Mardorf: > Seemingly you can't provide new arguments, so you should expect to > get

Re: How shall I report a bug in the .deb packaging itself?

Alberto Salvia Novella writes: > The problem seems to be that the package manager does not make its basic > functionality, which is to make clear for users which packages they wish > to remove. > For me it seems a minor problem that a console tool could be removed, > compared with packages accum

Re: How shall I report a bug in the .deb packaging itself?

Hi Alberto, seemingly you can't provide new arguments, so you should expect to get the same replies and perhaps some subscribers consider it as trolling or spamming, so that they don't read mails of this thread anymore. On Sun, 27 Dec 2015 15:22:02 +0100, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: Davi

Re: How shall I report a bug in the .deb packaging itself?

David Kalnischkies: > Your complain was after all that apt declares some packages you > consider unused as used... The problem seems to be that the package manager does not make its basic functionality, which is to make clear for users which packages they wish to remove. For me it seems a min

Re: How shall I report a bug in the .deb packaging itself?

On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 01:50:45AM +0100, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: > Luis Felipe Tabera Alonso: > David Kalnischkies: > > It is not a good idea to perform autoremoves unattended for situations > > in which you have installed A (gui) depends B (console) depends > > C (data), but later decide th

Re: How shall I report a bug in the .deb packaging itself?

Ralf Mardorf: > Do you think it would be a good idea if apt would provide a checklist > that ask the user for each command 20 or 30 questions before it > continues? It could be that, instead of asking if to proceed, to write down packages to exclude. Alberto Salvia Novella: > What should "pur

Re: How shall I report a bug in the .deb packaging itself?

Hi Alberto, On Thu, 24 Dec 2015 01:50:45 +0100, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: >What if: >- "remove" removes a package and all the unused depends, recommends >and suggests. >- but before removing asks the user to exclude packages from the >removal, and from that moment marks those as installed by

Re: How shall I report a bug in the .deb packaging itself?

On 24/12/15 00:50, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: [snip] Imagine that we have the perfect way to innovate. That we have decided slowly along with other people, the change is small, we have put it on test as prototype, and the outcome seems to be very positive. Would that make us get rid of co

Re: How shall I report a bug in the .deb packaging itself?

Luis Felipe Tabera Alonso: aptitude why $packagename Oh! this is very useful! David Kalnischkies: > It is not a good idea to perform autoremoves unattended for situations > in which you have installed A (gui) depends B (console) depends > C (data), but later decide that you don't like A. Wha

Re: How shall I report a bug in the .deb packaging itself?

nattended-upgrades/+bug/1357093 *) "apt-get autoremove" should always be safe; one can use apt-mark manual to pin pakcages *) "apt-get remove $(deborphan)" is more dangerous; and should be done manually; and then one can also build fake empty packages with equivs to register som

Re: How shall I report a bug in the .deb packaging itself?

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:35:25AM +, Robie Basak wrote: > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 03:08:51PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > I'll repeat this one last time for you: If A suggests B, and you > > install B in some way, you may have come to rely on the fact that A is > > extended by B on yo

Re: How shall I report a bug in the .deb packaging itself?

On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 00:35:25 +, Robie Basak wrote: >On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 03:08:51PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: >> I'll repeat this one last time for you: If A suggests B, and you >> install B in some way, you may have come to rely on the fact that A >> is extended by B on your system.

Re: How shall I report a bug in the .deb packaging itself?

On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 03:08:51PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > I'll repeat this one last time for you: If A suggests B, and you > install B in some way, you may have come to rely on the fact that A is > extended by B on your system. Automatically removing B could thus > cause an unexpected

Re: How shall I report a bug in the .deb packaging itself?

On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 04:57:39PM +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote: > Hi Julian > > On Mon, 2015-12-21 at 16:13 +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > I also wrote I am thinking about adding some kind of apt revert command > > that allows you to revert entries from apt's history.log, which would allo

Re: How shall I report a bug in the .deb packaging itself?

hat were previously installed > merely suggest gdm, so the end result is that the package will stay > installed. > > If you don't want that, you can set > APT::AutoRemove::SuggestsImportant > to false. it is maybe also worth mentioning that since apt 1.1.5 and fixing of Debian bug

Re: How shall I report a bug in the .deb packaging itself?

On Mon, 2015-12-21 at 17:03 +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 04:57:39PM +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote: > > Hi Julian > > > > On Mon, 2015-12-21 at 16:13 +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > > I also wrote I am thinking about adding some kind of apt revert command > > >

Re: How shall I report a bug in the .deb packaging itself?

On lunes, 21 de diciembre de 2015 16:10:31 (CET) Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: > Julian Andres Klode: > > If A suggests B, and you install B in some way, you may have come to > > rely on the fact that A is extended by B on your system. > > Automatically removing B could thus cause an unexpected

Re: How shall I report a bug in the .deb packaging itself?

Hi Julian On Mon, 2015-12-21 at 16:13 +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > I also wrote I am thinking about adding some kind of apt revert command > that allows you to revert entries from apt's history.log, which would allow > you to undo install commands. That will be really a great feature. I was

Re: How shall I report a bug in the .deb packaging itself?

On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 04:10:31PM +0100, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: > Julian Andres Klode: > > If A suggests B, and you install B in some way, you may have come to > > rely on the fact that A is extended by B on your system. > > Automatically removing B could thus cause an unexpected loss of >

Re: How shall I report a bug in the .deb packaging itself?

On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 04:37:40PM +0100, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: > Julian Andres Klode: > > Usually it is a Suggests from another existing package. > > If I run "apt-cache depends gnome-shell", it says: > Recommends: gdm > Breaks: gdm > > Is this normal, having a package both as recommende

Re: How shall I report a bug in the .deb packaging itself?

On 21 December 2015 at 14:59, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: > Julian Andres Klode: >> >> autoremove will remove all packages that no other package >> PreDepends, Depends, Recommends, or Suggests. > > > Probably the problem is the latest. > > Since I did not install other package apart from cortina

Re: How shall I report a bug in the .deb packaging itself?

Julian Andres Klode: It does not show you version numbers. gnome-shell recommends gdm, because it works best with it, and breaks old gdm versions it does not work with. Okay. Thank you. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-d

Re: How shall I report a bug in the .deb packaging itself?

Julian Andres Klode: > Usually it is a Suggests from another existing package. If I run "apt-cache depends gnome-shell", it says: Recommends: gdm Breaks: gdm Is this normal, having a package both as recommended and as breaking? smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- Ubuntu

Re: How shall I report a bug in the .deb packaging itself?

Julian Andres Klode: > If A suggests B, and you install B in some way, you may have come to > rely on the fact that A is extended by B on your system. > Automatically removing B could thus cause an unexpected loss of > functionality. The point I do not understand is why after removing A, being A

Re: How shall I report a bug in the .deb packaging itself?

Julian Andres Klode: autoremove will remove all packages that no other package PreDepends, Depends, Recommends, or Suggests. Probably the problem is the latest. Since I did not install other package apart from cortina, probably what is holding back gdm is a package already present in the syst

Re: How shall I report a bug in the .deb packaging itself?

Oliver Grawert: well, there is a very simple solution, do not use -y :) > also, an "average user" as describer on the papercuts wiki should > never even have to use apt or a terminal. Isn't that the same as installing a package from the Software Center? smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Crypt

Re: How shall I report a bug in the .deb packaging itself?

hi, Am Montag, den 21.12.2015, 13:35 +0100 schrieb Alberto Salvia Novella: > Julian Andres Klode: > > It just happens that some of the newly installed dependencies are > also > > Suggested by other installed packages, and thus are not removed, > > because you might have installed the package in

Re: How shall I report a bug in the .deb packaging itself?

Julian Andres Klode: > It just happens that some of the newly installed dependencies are also > Suggested by other installed packages, and thus are not removed, > because you might have installed the package in order to extend the > functionality of another installed package suggesting it. sudo a

Re: Please, complete this bug report

On Sun, 20 Dec 2015 20:23:47 +0100, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: >Ralf Mardorf: >> It's not a bug of the package management, it's an user error. > >What is the likelihood of these people making the error?: >https://wiki.ubuntu.com/One%20Hundred%20Papercuts/Average

Re: Please, complete this bug report

Ralf Mardorf: It's not a bug of the package management, it's an user error. What is the likelihood of these people making the error?: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/One%20Hundred%20Papercuts/Average%20users smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- Ubuntu-devel-discu

Re: Please, complete this bug report

On Sun, 20 Dec 2015 19:49:53 +0100, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: >Please enter any package manager that is unlisted in: >https://bugs.launchpad.net/apt/+bug/1528028 "For example if I install the "cortina" package, it takes with it the GNOME Display Manager and plenty of

Please, complete this bug report

Please enter any package manager that is unlisted in: https://bugs.launchpad.net/apt/+bug/1528028 Thanks. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https

Re: Filezilla bug in Wily

Le 30/10/2015 08:13, jeremy a écrit : > Hello, > > There is a little bug in Filezilla in Wily. I have this error when I try > to import my settings (File / Import settings) previously saved in a xml > file: > > buildinfo.cpp(118): assert "*version >= '

[BUG 1397142]

How unity-settings-daemon recive pressed keys from xorg? And how it send keys to plugins (media-keys)? unity-settings-daemon skip XF86AudioPlay key with keycode "208". But recive XF86AudioPlay key with keycode "172". I check it in gdb. But i cant find where key recived from X server. -- Ubuntu-de

[BUG 1397142]

rom X server. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-settings-daemon/+bug/1397142 -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss

Bug with the last uptdate to 4.3.34

Today there was a update of my system (Xubuntu 14.04), with update of VirtualBox to 4.3.34 Each virtual machine crashes - I have seen a error message with some UUID not available. I send a report . Where can I get more info ? Thak you Robert Spilleboudt -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubun

Filezilla bug in Wily

Hello, There is a little bug in Filezilla in Wily. I have this error when I try to import my settings (File / Import settings) previously saved in a xml file: buildinfo.cpp(118): assert "*version >= '0' && *version <= '9'" failed in ConvertToVersionNum

"Trash" Bug

Hello, I'm pretty sure you are already aware but just in case this "Trash" bug have to be fixed before the Wily release: gvfs-trash doesn't add "trash::" attrs to file which is moved to Trash <https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/1495943>

RE: Bug when trying to empty trash?

> On 15.04 I do see the confirmation dialog, but it also opens a new > nautilus window. This is not exactly what is described in the bug, > but may well be a related issue. Perhaps the bug description needs to > be updated, or a new bug opened. > > Colin That&#

Re: Bug when trying to empty trash?

te: > > > > I was going to file this as a bug, but I didn't know if it was the > desired > > reaction. When you go to empty the trash by right clicking on the > launcher > > it will open nautilus. Shouldn't it just empty the trash without > havi

Re: Bug when trying to empty trash?

On 26 August 2015 at 16:42, Oliver Grawert wrote: > hi, > Am Mittwoch, den 26.08.2015, 16:00 +0200 schrieb Amr Ibrahim: >> "I was going to file this as a bug, but I didn't know if it was the desired >> reaction. When you go to empty the trash by right clicking on t

Re: Bug when trying to empty trash?

hi, Am Mittwoch, den 26.08.2015, 16:00 +0200 schrieb Amr Ibrahim: > "I was going to file this as a bug, but I didn't know if it was the desired > reaction. When you go to empty the trash by right clicking on the launcher it > will open nautilus. Shouldn't it just empty

Re: Bug when trying to empty trash?

"I was going to file this as a bug, but I didn't know if it was the desired reaction. When you go to empty the trash by right clicking on the launcher it will open nautilus. Shouldn't it just empty the trash without having to open nautilus?" It's already a bug here h

Re: Bug when trying to empty trash?

Hi, Le 25/08/2015 18:15, Istimsak Abdulbasir a écrit : > > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Ryein Goddard <mailto:ryein.godd...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > I was going to file this as a bug, but I didn't know if it was the desired > reaction. When yo

Re: Bug when trying to empty trash?

On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Ryein Goddard wrote: > I was going to file this as a bug, but I didn't know if it was the desired > reaction. When you go to empty the trash by right clicking on the launcher > it will open nautilus. Shouldn't it just empty the trash witho

Bug when trying to empty trash?

I was going to file this as a bug, but I didn't know if it was the desired reaction. When you go to empty the trash by right clicking on the launcher it will open nautilus. Shouldn't it just empty the trash without having to open nautilus? If nautilus doesn't have this function

Re: How to file a bug against an unknown package? - Was: Green hard disk drives

On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 08:47:33 -0500, Jamie Strandboge wrote: >On 08/14/2015 10:07 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >> On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 01:33:46 +0100, João M. S. Silva wrote: >>> On 08/15/2015 01:12 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: As already pointed out, the drive in question is _sdc_, not _sdb_ >>> >>> Wha

Re: How to file a bug against an unknown package? - Was: Green hard disk drives

On 08/14/2015 10:07 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 01:33:46 +0100, João M. S. Silva wrote: >> On 08/15/2015 01:12 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >>> As already pointed out, the drive in question is _sdc_, not _sdb_ >> >> What about kworker? > > I wonder, if AppArmor or any of the other so

Re: How to file a bug against an unknown package? - Was: Green hard disk drives

On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 01:33:46 +0100, João M. S. Silva wrote: >On 08/15/2015 01:12 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >> As already pointed out, the drive in question is _sdc_, not _sdb_ > >What about kworker? I wonder, if AppArmor or any of the other software I didn't chose to install myself could be the cul

Re: How to file a bug against an unknown package? - Was: Green hard disk drives

On 08/15/2015 01:12 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: As already pointed out, the drive in question is _sdc_, not _sdb_ [1]. What about kworker? -- João M. S. Silva -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/ma

Re: How to file a bug against an unknown package? - Was: Green hard disk drives

On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 00:57:42 +0100, João M. S. Silva wrote: >If jbd2 is writing 12.8 times per min how can your disk spin down >after 30 min? As already pointed out, the drive in question is _sdc_, not _sdb_ [1]. Regards, Ralf [1] On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 23:20:25 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >[snip] >

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >