Op dinsdag 08-05-2007 om 21:42 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Fergal
Daly:
> I'm looking for clarification of policy in the context of this bug
>
> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-system-tools/+bug/71336
>
> and the fact that having your own version of Perl in /usr/local will
> almost c
Ming Hua wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 08:33:41PM -0700, Micah Cowan wrote:
>> Ming Hua wrote:
>>> For the sake of discussion, I think
>>>
>>> #!/usr/bin/env perl
>>>
>>> will pick up $PATH and is a valid #! line. I also believe this is widely
>>> used.
>> Yes, it will. But isn't that a somewha
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 08:33:41PM -0700, Micah Cowan wrote:
> Ming Hua wrote:
> >
> > For the sake of discussion, I think
> >
> > #!/usr/bin/env perl
> >
> > will pick up $PATH and is a valid #! line. I also believe this is widely
> > used.
>
> Yes, it will. But isn't that a somewhat silly su
Ming Hua wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 08:59:19AM -0700, Micah Cowan wrote:
>> Fergal Daly wrote:
>>
>>> You are also implying that everything in /usr/bin that start with
>>>
>>> #! /usr/bin/{perl,python,...}
>>>
>>> is wrong and should actually start with
>>>
>>> #! {perl,python,...}
>> That do
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 08:59:19AM -0700, Micah Cowan wrote:
> Fergal Daly wrote:
>
> > You are also implying that everything in /usr/bin that start with
> >
> > #! /usr/bin/{perl,python,...}
> >
> > is wrong and should actually start with
> >
> > #! {perl,python,...}
>
> That doesn't work. #!
On 10/05/07, Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fergal Daly wrote:
> > On 10/05/07, Forest Bond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 07:03:30PM -0400, Jim Doherty wrote:
> >>> Sorry, I have no idea what ubuntu policy is. But good defensive
> >>> scripting practice include
Fergal Daly wrote:
> On 10/05/07, Forest Bond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 07:03:30PM -0400, Jim Doherty wrote:
>>> Sorry, I have no idea what ubuntu policy is. But good defensive
>>> scripting practice includes setting your $PATH to something safe. A
>>> good script sho
On 10/05/07, Forest Bond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 07:03:30PM -0400, Jim Doherty wrote:
> > Sorry, I have no idea what ubuntu policy is. But good defensive
> > scripting practice includes setting your $PATH to something safe. A
> > good script should always not trust t
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 07:03:30PM -0400, Jim Doherty wrote:
> Sorry, I have no idea what ubuntu policy is. But good defensive
> scripting practice includes setting your $PATH to something safe. A
> good script should always not trust the environment it was handed along
> with many other things
Fergal Daly wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for clarification of policy in the context of this bug
>
> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-system-tools/+bug/71336
>
> and the fact that having your own version of Perl in /usr/local will
> almost certainly break your Ubuntu admin tools.
>
> I
On 09/05/07, Soren Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 10:43:29AM +0200, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> > > "However, because /usr/local and its contents are for exclusive use
> > > of the local administrator, a package must not rely on the presence
> > > or absence of files or dir
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 10:43:29AM +0200, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> > "However, because /usr/local and its contents are for exclusive use
> > of the local administrator, a package must not rely on the presence
> > or absence of files or directories in /usr/local for normal
> > operation."
> how does
hi,
On Di, 2007-05-08 at 21:42 +0100, Fergal Daly wrote:
>
> "However, because /usr/local and its contents are for exclusive use of
> the local administrator, a package must not rely on the presence or
> absence of files or directories in /usr/local for normal operation."
how does that even remot
On 08/05/07, Daniel Robitaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/8/07, Fergal Daly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I can't see any real benefit to including /usr/local/bin and I can
> > find plenty of people in the forums who can't start *-admin,
> > presumably due to problems similar to mine,
>
On 5/8/07, Fergal Daly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I can't see any real benefit to including /usr/local/bin and I can
> find plenty of people in the forums who can't start *-admin,
> presumably due to problems similar to mine,
I personally use /usr/local/bin to install my own version of Firefox
15 matches
Mail list logo
