Il 18/05/2010 19:12, Ryan Oram ha scritto:
> "Chrome Incognito Tracks Visited Sites"
> http://www.lewiz.org/2010/05/chrome-incognito-tracks-visited-sites.html
I just backported upstream commit that fixes this huge privacy killer
bug...
> This seems to be becoming a theme. As Chromium has much of
Hi.
AFAIK, even Chrome has disabled most tracking stuff per default (except
those things which FF/etc. do too).
With chromium, it was regarded to be a (reportable) bug if anything that
is privacy sensitive could not be disabled, IIRC.
And regarding Iron,... the following might be interesting:
ht
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Joao Pinto wrote:
>
>> I can't start a SRWare PPA immediately as they haven't released
>> updated source code in some time (probably due to neglience if
>> anything).
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ryan
>
> If you believe there are serious concerns with the current chromium pack
> I can't start a SRWare PPA immediately as they haven't released
> updated source code in some time (probably due to neglience if
> anything).
>
> Thanks,
> Ryan
>
If you believe there are serious concerns with the current chromium package
just file bugs, why fork when you can fix it ?
Best rega
"Ryan Oram" wrote:
>A Launchpad PPA of SRWare Iron would solve all my concerns.
Fortunately those are open to everyone so you are able to scratch your own itch.
Scott K
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lis
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Dane Mutters wrote:
> I think some of you would be interested in reading this page that
> (allegedly) documents some of the (allegedly) somewhat shady
> beginnings of Iron:
>
> http://neugierig.org/software/chromium/notes/2009/12/iron.html
>
> If this information i
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs
wrote:
> Just do it !!! Ubuntu has chromium maintainers already. Start your own
> SRWare ppa.
>
> And please stop spamming ubuntu & debian mailing list. You were
> already asked once to stop this non-sence.
>
> When you have constructive packaging
accidently hit reply instead of sending to the list...whoops...
I think some of you would be interested in reading this page that
(allegedly) documents some of the (allegedly) somewhat shady
beginnings of Iron:
http://neugierig.org/software/chromium/notes/2009/12/iron.html
If this informat
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs
wrote:
> The chromium daily builds ppa is more accuratly should be described as
> a mini-fork it has spliced chromium tree almost in half and throughout
> out loads of junk (embedded copies of libraries being the most
> significant part).
>
> My pe
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Dylan McCall wrote:
>> I've posted this on the debian-devel mailing list as well. This was
>> posted out of a concern that Canoncial is thinking about switching
>> over to Chromium in later releases as Lubuntu has done already. I have
>> seen articles of this possi
On 19 May 2010 00:49, Dylan McCall wrote:
>> I've posted this on the debian-devel mailing list as well. This was
>> posted out of a concern that Canoncial is thinking about switching
>> over to Chromium in later releases as Lubuntu has done already. I have
>> seen articles of this possibility as w
> I've posted this on the debian-devel mailing list as well. This was
> posted out of a concern that Canoncial is thinking about switching
> over to Chromium in later releases as Lubuntu has done already. I have
> seen articles of this possibility as well. I don't feel making
> Chromium the default
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:33 AM, Jonathon Fernyhough
wrote:
> Unless things have changed, Chromium does not include the tracking
> features of the branded Chrome. Hence, Chromium is fine. Plus it has
> the benefit of already being a full open source project.
It doesn't include everything, but it
On 18 May 2010 01:15, Ryan Oram wrote:
> http://www.srware.net/en/software_srware_iron_chrome_vs_iron.php
>
> This should become a full open source project with a community behind
> it. With Mozilla disregarding H.264, the community needs a full
> browser capable of H.264 video playback without th
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 1:30 PM, John Moser wrote:
> Shut up. You're whining like a raving politicized lune and nobody is
> listening to your monologue.
>
> Apply some critical thinking skills. It's a bug in a special mode of a
> browser, a mode that doesn't store history/cookies. It's not (kno
Don't hold back, John. Tell us how you really feel.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 1:30 PM, John Moser wrote:
> Shut up. You're whining like a raving politicized lune and nobody is
> listening to your monologue.
>
> Apply some critical thinking skills. It's a bug in a special mode of a
> browser, a mo
Shut up. You're whining like a raving politicized lune and nobody is
listening to your monologue.
Apply some critical thinking skills. It's a bug in a special mode of a
browser, a mode that doesn't store history/cookies. It's not (known to be)
sharing anything with the 'net, so it's innocuous a
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Ryan Oram wrote:
> "Chrome Incognito Tracks Visited Sites"
> http://www.lewiz.org/2010/05/chrome-incognito-tracks-visited-sites.html
>
> This seems to be becoming a theme. As Chromium has much of the same
> privacy issues as Chrome (SRWare Iron is made from Chromiu
"Chrome Incognito Tracks Visited Sites"
http://www.lewiz.org/2010/05/chrome-incognito-tracks-visited-sites.html
This seems to be becoming a theme. As Chromium has much of the same
privacy issues as Chrome (SRWare Iron is made from Chromium and the
code is striped from Chromium), this "feature" is
http://www.srware.net/en/software_srware_iron_chrome_vs_iron.php
This should become a full open source project with a community behind
it. With Mozilla disregarding H.264, the community needs a full
browser capable of H.264 video playback without the privacy issues of
Chrome.
We need to "Icewease
20 matches
Mail list logo
