Re: Transmission as default bittorrent client

2008-02-09 Thread Jonathan Musther
Subject: Re: Transmission as default bittorrent client To: Bryan Quigley [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Feb 6, 2008 2:44 AM, Bryan Quigley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My initial reaction was similar. However, in transmissions favor Memory usage (quick test) Deluge at 23 Mb Transmission at 7 Mb

Re: Transmission as default bittorrent client

2008-02-07 Thread A. Walton
On Feb 7, 2008 7:46 PM, Remco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I noticed I didn't actually send this to the list... here it is. Remco -- Forwarded message -- From: Remco [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Feb 6, 2008 3:33 AM Subject: Re: Transmission as default bittorrent client To: Bryan

Re: Transmission as default bittorrent client

2008-02-06 Thread Mackenzie Morgan
On Feb 5, 2008 8:44 PM, Bryan Quigley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The interface also seems more transitional from the previous integrated client. But that interface was crappy. I won't argue on the system requirements though. Aside from the memory usage you noticed, I tend to renice Deluge

Re: Transmission as default bittorrent client

2008-02-06 Thread Jonathan Musther
I seem to be the only one who likes Transmission. I really don't think it's fair to call the interface crappy, it's difference from deluge, but perhaps more in keeping with Ubuntu (and Gnome) in that it's main window is simple, to get more technical info you have to open the details window.

Re: Transmission as default bittorrent client

2008-02-06 Thread Vadim Peretokin
On Feb 6, 2008 1:36 PM, Jonathan Musther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I seem to be the only one who likes Transmission. I really don't think it's fair to call the interface crappy, it's difference from deluge, but perhaps more in keeping with Ubuntu (and Gnome) in that it's main window is

Transmission as default bittorrent client

2008-02-05 Thread Remco
Hello, I'm new here, I would like to comment on the decision to make Transmission the default bittorrent client in Hardy. Why was this program chosen? It seems to me (though, as a fan, I'm biased) that Deluge is more popular and more familiar (looks like µTorrent Azureus). Transmission has a bit

Re: Transmission as default bittorrent client

2008-02-05 Thread Vadim Peretokin
on the decision to make Transmission the default bittorrent client in Hardy. Why was this program chosen? It seems to me (though, as a fan, I'm biased) that Deluge is more popular and more familiar (looks like µTorrent Azureus). Transmission has a bit of a clunky interface by opening another window

Re: Transmission as default bittorrent client

2008-02-05 Thread Bryan Quigley
with Metacity, the thread got really quiet) On Feb 5, 2008 7:37 PM, Remco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I'm new here, I would like to comment on the decision to make Transmission the default bittorrent client in Hardy. Why was this program chosen? It seems to me (though, as a fan, I'm

Re: Transmission as default bittorrent client

2008-02-05 Thread Murat Gunes
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 20:20 -0500, Vadim Peretokin wrote: If I remember right, Transmission was chosen over Deluge because the devs thought both had similar features, but Deluge had an option to password-protect the tray in some tab under preferences, which someone didn't like. So.. For