On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Denis Washington wrote:
Greetings Dennis,
Given that this Ubuntu cycle is all about precision with little
Who do you think? (Is that something to file a bug about?)
I think it's an excellent idea to streamline the Grub menu. Could you
perhaps try to mock up before/after
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 08:32:35AM +, Paul Sladen wrote:
I think it's an excellent idea to streamline the Grub menu. Could you
perhaps try to mock up before/after screenshots, so that it's clear
each change that you'd like to make?
As the Ubuntu GRUB maintainer I'd prefer text. Since we
Am 18.01.2012 12:43, schrieb Colin Watson:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 08:32:35AM +, Paul Sladen wrote:
I think it's an excellent idea to streamline the Grub menu. Could you
perhaps try to mock up before/after screenshots, so that it's clear
each change that you'd like to make?
As the Ubuntu
Denis Washington writes:
- The Ubuntu entries as the kernel version (Ubuntu, with kernel
3.2.0-9...) that do not relate to anything that we usually present
the user. It would be much nicer if we had the actual Ubuntu version
stand there instead, so that the entry just becomes Ubuntu 12.04.
Also, on my system (as well as many others), I end up with 2 lines for
Windows 7 (or Vista, when I was using that)--only one of which boots. One
is the system partition; one is the main partition. Fixing this by hand
wouldn't be such a big deal if one didn't have to write part of a shell
script
Hello,
Given that this Ubuntu cycle is all about precision with little
details, how about taking some techie cruft out of the GRUB boot
selection menu entries? Currently, these seem pretty confusing to a
casual user:
- The Ubuntu entries as the kernel version (Ubuntu, with kernel
