Daniel Hollocher wrote:
Hey Patrick,
I'm only suggesting this because I know about it:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/MainlineBuilds and
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/
At least you may avoid having to compile the kernel yourself.
Are they compiled for karmic or
Just one point to make here
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Paul Smith p...@mad-scientist.us wrote:
I used to [compile my own kernel] all the time but it's been years since I
needed
some new feature enough to spend the effort of compiling my own kernel,
rather than just using what came
Oli Warner wrote:
Just one point to make here
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Paul Smith p...@mad-scientist.us
mailto:p...@mad-scientist.us wrote:
I used to [compile my own kernel] all the time but it's been years
since I needed
some new feature enough to spend the effort of
schoappied wrote:
Oli Warner wrote:
Just one point to make here
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Paul Smith p...@mad-scientist.us
mailto:p...@mad-scientist.us wrote:
I used to [compile my own kernel] all the time but it's been years
since I needed
some new feature enough to
Subject: Re: lucid and 2.6.33?
From: Jonathon Fernyhough j.fernyho...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:34:20 +
As far as I am aware the important bits of .33 are being integrated
into the special sauce for the Lucid .32 kernel.
Perhaps someone can explain why this makes more
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Patrick Goetz pgo...@mail.utexas.edu wrote:
Subject: Re: lucid and 2.6.33?
From: Jonathon Fernyhough j.fernyho...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:34:20 +
As far as I am aware the important bits of .33 are being integrated
into the special sauce
Flávio Etrusco wrote:
Seriously? Ubuntu is not only about techies, it's about general
use(rs) and businesses too. They have to have a solid and well-tested
base.
If you really wanna know what you're actually getting, you have the
sources and the changelogs.
It's not clear to me how a
Hey Patrick,
I'm only suggesting this because I know about it:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/MainlineBuilds and
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/
At least you may avoid having to compile the kernel yourself.
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
On 3/25/2010 4:41 PM, Patrick Goetz wrote:
It's not clear to me how a handful of folks at Canonical or RedHat
splicing and dicing kernel code from one version into another
necessarily gives you greater stability than an officially released
kernel that has been thoroughly tested by thousands
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 15:41 -0500, Patrick Goetz wrote:
Flávio Etrusco wrote:
Seriously? Ubuntu is not only about techies, it's about general
use(rs) and businesses too. They have to have a solid and well-tested
base.
If you really wanna know what you're actually getting, you have the
Now that the 2.6.34 linux kernel is about to be released, does anyone
know if 2.6.33 is going to make it into the final Lucid release, as
previously suggested?
Why this is important: 2.6.33 has better support for SSD storage
On 24 March 2010 21:31, Patrick Goetz pgo...@mail.utexas.edu wrote:
Now that the 2.6.34 linux kernel is about to be released, does anyone
know if 2.6.33 is going to make it into the final Lucid release, as
previously suggested?
As far as I am aware the important bits of .33 are being
salam
i hve some issue in ubuntuthat when i check the ifconfig then show yhe
complete ip addresses and also mack address.but when i check the netstat
comand then show default gateway also but (*) show on some placecs,so
plz tell me about that *...as sooon as???
On Thu, Mar
13 matches
Mail list logo
