Re: ntfs-3g in Lucid

2010-02-13 Thread stephan
So glad to hear it will make it into Lucid! Logical choice or not, many of us are forced to use large (fragmented, even!) NTFS drives because high-throughput data acquisition or other machines unfortunately run proprietary operating systems. Also, for collaboration and data-sharing, we do not shi

Re: ntfs-3g in Lucid

2010-02-13 Thread Benjamin Drung
Am Samstag, den 13.02.2010, 19:22 +0200 schrieb Timo Jyrinki: > 2010/2/11 Patrick Goetz : > >> upgrade to get 2010.1.16 into testing: > > > > Doesn't look like it: > > Just to note, it's still in unstable in Debian, possibly migrating > into testing on 20th if no new release critical bugs are file

Re: ntfs-3g in Lucid

2010-02-13 Thread Timo Jyrinki
2010/2/11 Patrick Goetz : >> upgrade to get 2010.1.16 into testing: > > Doesn't look like it: Just to note, it's still in unstable in Debian, possibly migrating into testing on 20th if no new release critical bugs are filed against it before that. However, lucid's DebianImportFreeze was already on

ntfs-3g in Lucid

2010-02-11 Thread Patrick Goetz
> Subject: Re: Can we get ntfs-3g 2010.1.16 in Lucid? > From: stephan > Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 05:48:32 -0500 > To: Daniel Chen > > > It looks like Michael will help us all out and do a non-maintainer > upgrade to get 2010.1.16 into testing: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=56