Re: hottest100 (was Re: Bazaar focus for 2.1 and 2.2)

2010-01-06 Thread Jonathan Lange
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Jonathan Lange wrote: > On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 3:41 AM, James Westby > wrote: >> On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 10:32:08 -0600, John Arbash Meinel >> wrote: >>> So... how do we do that? Who gets assigned that task? I certainly don't >>> feel like I have any ability to mak

Re: hottest100 (was Re: Bazaar focus for 2.1 and 2.2)

2010-01-06 Thread Martin Pool
2010/1/7 Jonathan Lange : > For almost any of the decisions made on Launchpad, there isn't much in > the way of documentation as to why they were made that way. > Permissions is not an exception here. > > Most of the people I talk to admit that the Launchpad permission > system is haphazard, confus

Re: hottest100 (was Re: Bazaar focus for 2.1 and 2.2)

2010-01-06 Thread Jonathan Lange
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Jan 6, 2010, at 9:38 AM, Curtis Hovey wrote: > >> We have a general problem where knowledgeable contributors cannot update >> a project because Launchpad made someone else the owner (the owner may >> not want to be in that role). Examples in

Re: hottest100 (was Re: Bazaar focus for 2.1 and 2.2)

2010-01-06 Thread Andrew SB
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On the platform team, I worked on bug 494704 yesterday.  I started by > assigning the bug to myself.  I was dismayed that I could not set the status > of the bug to Won't Fix or Triaged.  The reason for this is not at all clear > or documen

Re: hottest100 (was Re: Bazaar focus for 2.1 and 2.2)

2010-01-06 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Jan 6, 2010, at 9:38 AM, Curtis Hovey wrote: > We have a general problem where knowledgeable contributors cannot update > a project because Launchpad made someone else the owner (the owner may > not want to be in that role). Examples include setting the product > release finder, setting the bug

Re: hottest100 (was Re: Bazaar focus for 2.1 and 2.2)

2010-01-06 Thread Curtis Hovey
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 11:38 +1100, Jonathan Lange wrote: > >> So the associating development focus does not seem to have been > done. > >> Again, I don't think I have access to actually change any of this > stuff. > >> (And obviously neither do you, or you probably would have done > it. :) > > > >

Re: hottest100 (was Re: Bazaar focus for 2.1 and 2.2)

2010-01-06 Thread Tim Penhey
On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 13:38:53 Jonathan Lange wrote: > >> So the associating development focus does not seem to have been done. > >> Again, I don't think I have access to actually change any of this stuff. > >> (And obviously neither do you, or you probably would have done it. :) > > > > Exactly. It

Re: hottest100 (was Re: Bazaar focus for 2.1 and 2.2)

2010-01-06 Thread Tim Penhey
On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 17:39:02 Jonathan Lange wrote: > On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Tim Penhey wrote: > > On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 13:38:53 Jonathan Lange wrote: > >> >> So the associating development focus does not seem to have been done. > >> >> Again, I don't think I have access to actually chang