On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 13:58 +, Jonathan Lange wrote:
In a previous discussion about Ubuntu distributed development, someone
suggested that we graph the number of Ubuntu branches that share
history with upstream.
I think that's a very interesting thing to graph, but I have
absolutely no
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Jelmer Vernooij jel...@canonical.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 13:58 +, Jonathan Lange wrote:
In a previous discussion about Ubuntu distributed development, someone
suggested that we graph the number of Ubuntu branches that share
history with upstream.
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 14:10 +, Jonathan Lange wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Jelmer Vernooij jel...@canonical.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 13:58 +, Jonathan Lange wrote:
In a previous discussion about Ubuntu distributed development, someone
suggested that we graph the
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:16:18 +0100, Jelmer Vernooij jel...@canonical.com
wrote:
So checking whether a revision is part of another branches' ancestry is
not really possible then, if I understand the current database scheme
correctly. You should be able to detect the common ancestry in most of
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:46:37 -0600, John Arbash Meinel j...@arbash-meinel.com
wrote:
Where is this script going to be running? I wrote a trivial command that
lets you run:
bzr in-ancestry branch1 branch2
And reports back if the ancestry of branch1 is in branch2.
