[Bug 1239457] Re: package mysql-server-5.5 5.5.32-0ubuntu0.13.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2013-10-15 Thread Dave Chiluk
This and 1192116 seem to be the same bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1239457 Title: package mysql-server-5.5 5.5.32-0ubuntu0.13.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess

[Bug 1121874] Re: MySQL launch fails silently if 4MB of disk space is available

2013-10-15 Thread Dave Chiluk
I'm taking this over from Adam. I found the bug in the debdiffs from above. I pushed the necessary changes to my ppa https://launchpad.net/~chiluk/+archive/1121874 I will be testing out of that ppa tomorrow, and will post debdiffs once I'm comfortable with their quality. -- You received this

[Bug 1215911] Re: wait-for-root fails to wait for plain /dev/sdaX partitions.

2013-10-10 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Tags added: verification-done-precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1215911 Title: wait-for-root fails to wait for plain /dev/sdaX partitions. To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1215911] Re: wait-for-root fails to wait for plain /dev/sdaX partitions.

2013-10-10 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Tags added: verification-done-quantal ** Tags added: verification-done-raring ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1215911] Re: wait-for-root fails to wait for plain /dev/sdaX partitions.

2013-10-10 Thread Dave Chiluk
An end-user that was experiencing the problem was able to verify that this fix solved his issue on precise. Unfortunately, as I am unable to reproduce all I could do was verify that initramfs-tools did not cause a noticeable regression on q,r. -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1150413] Re: Cannot allocate memory if process owned by user with large number of groups

2013-10-08 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Tags added: verification-quantal-done ** Tags removed: verification-quantal-done verification-saucy-done ** Tags added: verification-done-quantal verification-done-saucy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1150413] Re: Cannot allocate memory if process owned by user with large number of groups

2013-10-08 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Tags added: verification-done-raring -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1150413 Title: Cannot allocate memory if process owned by user with large number of groups To manage

[Bug 1150413] Re: Cannot allocate memory if process owned by user with large number of groups

2013-10-08 Thread Dave Chiluk
Verified p,q,r. All is looking good. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1150413 Title:

[Bug 1150413] Re: Cannot allocate memory if process owned by user with large number of groups

2013-10-08 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Changed in: procps (Ubuntu Quantal) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released ** Changed in: procps (Ubuntu Precise) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released ** Changed in: procps (Ubuntu Raring) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1121874] Re: MySQL launch fails silently if 4MB of disk space is available

2013-10-08 Thread Dave Chiluk
I also have not been able to successfully build using sbuild or pbuilder. I started from a clean 12.04.3 install, and followed the sbuild guide available here with no success https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/BuildEnvironment +mysqlcheck: Got error: 2003: Can't connect to MySQL server on

[Bug 1150413] Re: Cannot allocate memory if process owned by user with large number of groups

2013-09-30 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Changed in: procps (Ubuntu Precise) Assignee: (unassigned) = Dave Chiluk (chiluk) ** Changed in: procps (Ubuntu Quantal) Assignee: (unassigned) = Dave Chiluk (chiluk) ** Changed in: procps (Ubuntu Raring) Assignee: (unassigned) = Dave Chiluk (chiluk) -- You received this bug

[Bug 1150413] Re: Cannot allocate memory if process owned by user with large number of groups

2013-09-27 Thread Dave Chiluk
Verified saucy. ** Tags added: verification-saucy-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1150413 Title: Cannot allocate memory if process owned by user with large number of groups

[Bug 1150413] Re: Cannot allocate memory if process owned by user with large number of groups

2013-09-25 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Patch removed: lp1150413_saucy.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procps/+bug/1150413/+attachment/3839131/+files/lp1150413_saucy.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1150413] Re: Cannot allocate memory if process owned by user with large number of groups

2013-09-25 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Patch added: lp1150413_quantal.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procps/+bug/1150413/+attachment/3841230/+files/lp1150413_quantal.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1150413] Re: Cannot allocate memory if process owned by user with large number of groups

2013-09-25 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Patch added: lp1150413_raring.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procps/+bug/1150413/+attachment/3841231/+files/lp1150413_raring.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1150413] Re: Cannot allocate memory if process owned by user with large number of groups

2013-09-25 Thread Dave Chiluk
I updated the debdiffs and resultant quilt patches to include dep3 information. ** Patch removed: lp1150413_raring.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procps/+bug/1150413/+attachment/3839130/+files/lp1150413_raring.debdiff ** Patch removed: lp1150413_quantal.debdiff

[Bug 1150413] Re: Cannot allocate memory if process owned by user with large number of groups

2013-09-25 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Patch added: lp1150413_saucy.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procps/+bug/1150413/+attachment/3841232/+files/lp1150413_saucy.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1150413] Re: Cannot allocate memory if process owned by user with large number of groups

2013-09-24 Thread Dave Chiluk
/+attachment/3838616/+files/lp1150413_precise.debdiff ** Changed in: procps (Ubuntu) Assignee: Matthias Klose (doko) = Dave Chiluk (chiluk) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1150413

[Bug 1174444] Re: ps segfault when users have large numbers of group memberships (procps 3.2.8)

2013-09-24 Thread Dave Chiluk
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1150413 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1150413 cisconetgineer please see bug #1150413 A test ppa is available with a proposed fix. Please test and report back in 1150413 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1150413] Re: Cannot allocate memory if process owned by user with large number of groups

2013-09-24 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Patch removed: procps_precise.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procps/+bug/1150413/+attachment/3838616/+files/lp1150413_precise.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1150413] Re: Cannot allocate memory if process owned by user with large number of groups

2013-09-24 Thread Dave Chiluk
Thanks Javier for testing. I have since uploaded packages for quantal, raring, and saucy which should get built shortly. I'll go ahead and fill out the SRU now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1150413] Re: Cannot allocate memory if process owned by user with large number of groups

2013-09-24 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Patch added: lp1150413_precise.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procps/+bug/1150413/+attachment/3839128/+files/lp1150413_precise.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1150413] Re: Cannot allocate memory if process owned by user with large number of groups

2013-09-24 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Patch added: lp1150413_saucy.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procps/+bug/1150413/+attachment/3839131/+files/lp1150413_saucy.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1150413] Re: Cannot allocate memory if process owned by user with large number of groups

2013-09-24 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Patch added: lp1150413_raring.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procps/+bug/1150413/+attachment/3839130/+files/lp1150413_raring.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1150413] Re: Cannot allocate memory if process owned by user with large number of groups

2013-09-24 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Patch added: lp1150413_quantal.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procps/+bug/1150413/+attachment/3839129/+files/lp1150413_quantal.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1150413] Re: Cannot allocate memory if process owned by user with large number of groups

2013-09-24 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Description changed: - Both ps and pgrep exit with an error like xrealloc: realloc(1073741824) - failedCannot allocate memory if there is a process owned by a user with - a large number of groups. + [Impact] + + * Users that are members of large numbers of groups are unable to run + procps

[Bug 1150413] Re: Cannot allocate memory if process owned by user with large number of groups

2013-09-24 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Changed in: procps (Ubuntu Precise) Status: Triaged = Confirmed ** Changed in: procps (Ubuntu Raring) Status: Triaged = Confirmed ** Changed in: procps (Ubuntu Quantal) Status: Triaged = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1179781] Re: If-Modfied-Since undhandled case causes apt lists corruption with https repositories

2013-09-13 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Tags removed: verification-need-precise verification-needed-raring ** Tags added: verification-done-precise verification-done-raring -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1179781 Title:

[Bug 1179781] Re: If-Modfied-Since undhandled case causes apt lists corruption with https repositories

2013-09-13 Thread Dave Chiluk
Spun up a few VMs, and did verification, everything seems to be going swimingly. Marked as verified. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-quantal ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-quantal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1047566] Re: Memory leaks when using NFS

2013-09-13 Thread Dave Chiluk
I could not reproduce this problem, and will need some sort of reproduction procedure in order to pursue it further. I created a filesystem with 680666 randomly named 4k files, spread out among 6811 nested directories at a max depth of 5 levels of directories. I exported the filesystem using

[Bug 1179781] Re: If-Modfied-Since undhandled case causes apt lists corruption with https repositories

2013-09-08 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-needed-quantal ** Tags added: verification-needed-raring -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1179781 Title:

[Bug 1179781] Re: If-Modfied-Since undhandled case causes apt lists corruption with https repositories

2013-09-04 Thread Dave Chiluk
I got the below e-mails after the upload and build today. Hello Dave Chiluk, On 2013-09-04 23:30z (2 hours 46 minutes ago), you uploaded a file with translation templates for apt in Ubuntu Raring package apt to Launchpad. We were unable to import the file because of errors in its format

[Bug 1179781] Re: If-Modfied-Since undhandled case causes apt lists corruption with https repositories

2013-09-04 Thread Dave Chiluk
Infinity, just let me know on irc to ignore this, as a known issue. Precise-verified ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done-precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1179781] Re: If-Modfied-Since undhandled case causes apt lists corruption with https repositories

2013-08-31 Thread Dave Chiluk
@slangasek Verification for curl can not really be completed, until the updated apt gets pushed. That's because the issue that exists in curl only gets exacerbated when using the updated apt. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1179781] Re: If-Modfied-Since undhandled case causes apt lists corruption with https repositories

2013-08-30 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Patch added: apt_lp1179781_quantal.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1179781/+attachment/3795803/+files/apt_lp1179781_quantal.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1179781] Re: If-Modfied-Since undhandled case causes apt lists corruption with https repositories

2013-08-30 Thread Dave Chiluk
Updated apt so that apt-transport-https depends on libcurl3-gnutls (appropriate curl version) instead of a builddep for the whole package. ** Patch removed: apt_lp1179781_raring.debdiff

[Bug 1179781] Re: If-Modfied-Since undhandled case causes apt lists corruption with https repositories

2013-08-30 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Patch added: apt_lp1179781_raring.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1179781/+attachment/3795804/+files/apt_lp1179781_raring.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1179781] Re: If-Modfied-Since undhandled case causes apt lists corruption with https repositories

2013-08-26 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Dave Chiluk (chiluk) ** Changed in: curl (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Dave Chiluk (chiluk) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net

[Bug 1182247] Re: check_ide_smart fails with i/o error

2013-08-26 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Tags removed: verification-needed-raring ** Tags added: verification-done-raring -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1182247 Title: check_ide_smart fails with i/o error To manage

[Bug 1182247] Re: check_ide_smart fails with i/o error

2013-08-23 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Tags added: verification-needed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1182247 Title: check_ide_smart fails with i/o error To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1182247] Re: check_ide_smart fails with i/o error

2013-08-23 Thread Dave Chiluk
Can anyone on this bug please verify that the kernel in raring-proposed has resolved this issue and change the verification-needed tag to verification-done. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1047566] Re: Memory leaks when using NFS

2013-08-22 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Package changed: nfs-utils (Ubuntu) = linux (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1047566 Title: Memory leaks when using NFS To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1182247] Re: check_ide_smart fails with i/o error

2013-08-22 Thread Dave Chiluk
The fix for this was committed via 48f81bd7c and has now been pushed to raring-proposed with 3.8.0.30.48. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Dave Chiluk (chiluk) -- You received this bug

[Bug 1047566] Re: Memory leaks when using NFS

2013-08-22 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Tags added: precise quantal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1047566 Title: Memory leaks when using NFS To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1179781] Re: If-Modfied-Since undhandled case causes apt lists corruption with https repositories

2013-08-21 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Patch added: curl_lp1179781_precise.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1179781/+attachment/3780964/+files/curl_lp1179781_precise.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1179781] Re: If-Modfied-Since undhandled case causes apt lists corruption with https repositories

2013-08-21 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Patch added: curl_lp1179781_quantal.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1179781/+attachment/3780965/+files/curl_lp1179781_quantal.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1179781] Re: If-Modfied-Since undhandled case causes apt lists corruption with https repositories

2013-08-21 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Patch added: curl_lp1179781_raring.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1179781/+attachment/3780966/+files/curl_lp1179781_raring.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1179781] Re: If-Modfied-Since undhandled case causes apt lists corruption with https repositories

2013-08-21 Thread Dave Chiluk
Here's updated patches for curl, for precise, quantal and raring. These will need to be uploaded before apt, as apt has a build-dep on the updated curl. ** Patch removed: curl debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1179781/+attachment/3744942/+files/curl_lp1179781.debdiff

[Bug 1179781] Re: If-Modfied-Since undhandled case causes apt lists corruption with https repositories

2013-08-21 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Patch added: apt_lp1179781.precise.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1179781/+attachment/3780967/+files/apt_lp1179781.precise.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1179781] Re: If-Modfied-Since undhandled case causes apt lists corruption with https repositories

2013-08-21 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Patch added: apt_lp1179781_quantal.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1179781/+attachment/3780992/+files/apt_lp1179781_quantal.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1179781] Re: If-Modfied-Since undhandled case causes apt lists corruption with https repositories

2013-08-21 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Patch added: apt_lp1179781_quantal.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1179781/+attachment/3781062/+files/apt_lp1179781_quantal.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1179781] Re: If-Modfied-Since undhandled case causes apt lists corruption with https repositories

2013-08-21 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Patch removed: apt_lp1179781_quantal.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1179781/+attachment/3780992/+files/apt_lp1179781_quantal.debdiff ** Patch removed: curl_lp1179781_raring.debdiff

[Bug 1179781] Re: If-Modfied-Since undhandled case causes apt lists corruption with https repositories

2013-08-21 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Patch added: curl_lp1179781_raring.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1179781/+attachment/3781063/+files/curl_lp1179781_raring.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1179781] Re: If-Modfied-Since undhandled case causes apt lists corruption with https repositories

2013-08-21 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Patch added: apt_lp1179781_raring.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1179781/+attachment/3781066/+files/apt_lp1179781_raring.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1179781] Re: If-Modfied-Since undhandled case causes apt lists corruption with https repositories

2013-08-21 Thread Dave Chiluk
@mdeslaur Updated the debdiffs, and attached debdiffs for quantal and raring as well. They are pretty much identical with the exception of a few line changes. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = In Progress ** Changed in: curl (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = In

[Bug 1047566] Re: Memory leaks when using NFS

2013-08-21 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Changed in: nfs-utils (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Dave Chiluk (chiluk) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1047566 Title: Memory leaks when using NFS To manage

[Bug 1182247] Re: check_ide_smart fails with i/o error

2013-08-04 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Description changed: - It would seem that check_ide_smart is defunct on my server, giving the - following results when run manually: + SRU Justification: + + Impact: Smart monitoring tools such as smartd and nagios's + check_ide_smart fail with i/o error. + + Fix: Fix comes from upstream,

[Bug 1182247] Re: check_ide_smart fails with i/o error

2013-08-04 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1182247 Title: check_ide_smart fails with i/o error To manage notifications

[Bug 1182247] Re: check_ide_smart fails with i/o error

2013-08-04 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Description changed: SRU Justification: Impact: Smart monitoring tools such as smartd and nagios's check_ide_smart fail with i/o error. - Fix: Fix comes from upstream, and is solved by correcting + Fix: Fix comes from upstream b7b2ee88b4c8d3326d144a051252d78bded93557. + I have

[Bug 1087543] Re: apt-get does not properly reuse connections with https

2013-07-29 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087543 Title: apt-get does not properly reuse connections with https To manage

[Bug 1179781] Re: If-Modfied-Since undhandled case causes apt lists corruption with https repositories

2013-07-25 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = In Progress ** Changed in: curl (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1179781 Title:

[Bug 1179781] Re: If-Modfied-Since undhandled case causes apt lists corruption with https repositories

2013-07-25 Thread Dave Chiluk
Thanks oobermick, by new versions I assume you are referring to the ones in my ppa, and not the ones in updates right? Anyhow I'm filling out the SRU now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1179781] Re: If-Modfied-Since undhandled case causes apt lists corruption with https repositories

2013-07-25 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Description changed: [Impact] Users of apt repositories that use https will occasionally recieve an error message and not be able to update properly: W: Size of file /var/lib/apt/lists/partial/archive.example .com_dists_precise_main_binary-amd64_Packages is not what the server

[Bug 1179781] Re: If-Modfied-Since undhandled case causes apt lists corruption with https repositories

2013-07-22 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Dave Chiluk (chiluk) ** Changed in: curl (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Dave Chiluk (chiluk) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net

[Bug 1179781] Re: If-Modfied-Since undhandled case causes apt lists corruption with https repositories

2013-07-21 Thread Dave Chiluk
I put together a ppa with fixes for precise for this issue. Can someone who is experiencing this issue please test this ppa, and let me know if it fixes the issue. Please report back so I can continue with an SRU for this fix. https://launchpad.net/~chiluk/+archive/lp1179781/ I have attached

[Bug 1179781] Re: If-Modfied-Since undhandled case causes apt lists corruption with https repositories

2013-07-21 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Patch added: Apt Debdiff with solution https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1179781/+attachment/3744943/+files/apt_lp1179781.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1179781] Re: If-Modfied-Since undhandled case causes apt lists corruption with https repositories

2013-07-21 Thread Dave Chiluk
Also it should be noted that whoever applies the SRU needs to be careful to maintain the order of patches in the series file for curl, as applying this patch later down the stack will result in a failed build. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1179781] Re: If-Modfied-Since undhandled case causes apt lists corruption with https repositories

2013-07-19 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Changed in: curl (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1179781 Title: If-Modfied-Since undhandled case causes apt lists corruption with https

[Bug 1179781] Re: If-Modfied-Since undhandled case causes apt lists corruption with https repositories

2013-07-17 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Also affects: curl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1179781 Title: If-Modfied-Since undhandled case causes apt lists corruption

[Bug 1179781] Re: If-Modfied-Since undhandled case causes apt lists corruption with https repositories

2013-07-17 Thread Dave Chiluk
According to http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=705783 this looks to also be dependent on a required fix in curl. In order to avoid breaking apt. http://curl.haxx.se/mail/lib-2013-04/0311.html ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #705783

[Bug 879237] Re: Unity does not allow citrix receiver remote desktop to open full screen

2013-07-16 Thread Dave Chiluk
I do not seem to be able to reproduce this bug any more with the v13 beta. Can anyone else affected please confirm that this is fixed by the v13 beta, and report back? http://www.citrix.com/downloads/citrix-receiver/betas-and-tech-previews /receiver-for-linux-130-tech-preview.html -- You

[Bug 1087543] Re: apt-get does not properly reuse connections with https

2013-07-12 Thread Dave Chiluk
Here's a debdiff of tbushnell's patch. It's based off of the bzr branch availalbe here. lp:~ubuntu-core- dev/apt/precise ** Patch added: Debdiff of tbushnell's patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1087543/+attachment/3734702/+files/apt-fix-keep-alive.debdiff -- You

[Bug 1087543] Re: apt-get does not properly reuse connections with https

2013-07-12 Thread Dave Chiluk
I have tested this and have linked my related bzr branch as well In case that makes life easier. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087543 Title: apt-get does not properly reuse

[Bug 1087543] Re: apt-get does not properly reuse connections with https

2013-07-12 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Description changed: - When using an https: connection, apt-get does not properly reuse - connections. Because https setup costs can be quite high, this can cause - much slowdown when, for example, many different distributions on the - same server need to be checked. + [Impact] + + * Apt

[Bug 1087543] Re: apt-get does not properly reuse connections with https

2013-07-12 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Tags added: precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087543 Title: apt-get does not properly reuse connections with https To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1087543] Re: apt-get does not properly reuse connections with https

2013-07-12 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Description changed: [Impact] - * Apt does not re-use https connections. This results in a significant +  * Apt does not re-use https connections. This results in a significant performance hit. - * Additionally the hosts of mirrors are experiencing unnecessarily high +  *

[Bug 1132923] Re: [ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. UX32VD] suspend/resume failure

2013-07-11 Thread Dave Chiluk
I can not reproduce this on my ux32vd. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1132923 Title: [ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. UX32VD] suspend/resume failure To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1091838] Re: ubuntu hangs up at shutdown

2013-07-11 Thread Dave Chiluk
I had a similar issue with my Asus ux32vd zenbook prime laptop. This problem affected windows as well as linux, the only way I was able to resolve this is by pulling the cmos battery *(there was no cmos jumper) waiting and waiting a while before putting it all back together again. Reset to

[Bug 1005192] Re: Laptop won't shutdown correctly when on battery

2013-07-11 Thread Dave Chiluk
I had a similar issue to this, and it turned out to be a hardware issue. In order to fix this I had to reset my cmos, by opening my laptop and pulling the cmos battery. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1083186] Re: icaclient windows dancing when decorated

2013-07-10 Thread Dave Chiluk
There are still a number of bugs related to unity and icaclient, however this no longer seems reproducible. verification-redone for me as well.. Is there any chance of introducing a unity-lts-raring package instead of trying to fix this ancient version? That way the people who care can easily

[Bug 1150413] Re: Cannot allocate memory if process owned by user with large number of groups

2013-07-09 Thread Dave Chiluk
The fix referenced by comment #7 is https://www.gitorious.org/procps/procps/commit/7933435584aa1fd75460f4c7715a3d4855d97c1c Which is essentially the same fix as is attached in comment #3. As for comment #8, I'd have to look at the problem more closely. Grzegorz, perhaps you could put together a

[Bug 1193073] Re: cpu usage does not match sum of per-process usage

2013-07-01 Thread Dave Chiluk
This issue was brought up on the kernel mailing list https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/20/581 The issue is partially due to the massive number of soft interrupts being generated by this job, and the frequency at which top is doing the sampling. Increasing the sampling rate should improve accuracy,

[Bug 1171560] Re: Suspend to RAM is broken

2013-06-26 Thread Dave Chiluk
There seems to be two issues at play in that bug. Not sure how much they are related. One where people can get to the virtual consoles using ctrl+alt+f1 and one where they are not. When my machine comes back from resume it does not take any input, but instead drops me at a black screen with a

[Bug 1171560] Re: Suspend to RAM is broken

2013-06-26 Thread Dave Chiluk
I think I discovered the difference between the above two situations. In the case where the virtual consoles are reachable the nouveau driver is in use. In the case where there is just a black screen with a cursor and no interactivity the nvidia drivers are in use. -- You received this bug

[Bug 1035226] Re: Can't remove directory from NCP server

2013-06-21 Thread Dave Chiluk
Verified! ** Tags removed: verification-needed-raring ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035226 Title: Can't remove directory from NCP server To

[Bug 1035226] Re: Can't remove directory from NCP server

2013-06-21 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Precise) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Quantal) Assignee: (unassigned) = Dave Chiluk (chiluk) ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Raring) Assignee: (unassigned) = Dave Chiluk (chiluk) ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Saucy

[Bug 1193073] Re: cpu usage does not match sum of per-process usage

2013-06-20 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Dave Chiluk (chiluk) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1193073 Title: cpu usage does not match sum of per-process usage

[Bug 1193073] Re: cpu usage does not match sum of per-process usage

2013-06-20 Thread Dave Chiluk
I have verified the above results in a virtual machine, netperf, and netserver were both showing 41-42% cpu usage while per cpu usage were showing 63-65%. I also verified this with 3.10-rc6. I also did a test, which was to run taskset -c 1 nice 19 stress -c 1 while running the above netperf. I

[Bug 1193073] Re: cpu usage does not match sum of per-process usage

2013-06-20 Thread Dave Chiluk
The results from the raw proc data show that top is reporting the same numbers as the raw output. So this issue exists somewhere in the scheduler accounting. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1183269] Re: new upstream release 9.1.3

2013-06-13 Thread Dave Chiluk
Yep 9.1.3-0ubuntu0.2 available from bug #1187500 resolves the issue . Moved this bug to regression-proposed and verification-failed per the SRUVerification page. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: regression-proposed verification-failed -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1187500] Re: [Saucy] Unity is slow on Intel graphics

2013-06-13 Thread Dave Chiluk
Tested, 9.1.3-0ubuntu0.2 fixes the regression introeduced by LP: #1183269 Thanks. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1150413] Re: Cannot allocate memory if process owned by user with large number of groups

2013-06-13 Thread Dave Chiluk
@doko What's going on with this? We have at least 18 people waiting on this and a few in other bugs. The fix looks pretty safe. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1150413 Title:

[Bug 1183269] Re: new upstream release 9.1.3

2013-06-12 Thread Dave Chiluk
I think this should go to verification failed, as it introduced 1187500 which basically makes the dash and alt-tab unusable. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1183269 Title: new

[Bug 1083186] Re: icaclient windows dancing when decorated

2013-06-12 Thread Dave Chiluk
@SRU team It looks like unity 5 SRU 4 for precise has been in the unity teams ppa for some time, but has stalled getting into precise-proposed https://launchpad.net/unity/+milestone/5.20.0. Can we get some action on this? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1083186] Re: icaclient windows dancing when decorated

2013-06-12 Thread Dave Chiluk
Looks like it was uploaded today for anyone that is curious. Shouldn't be long now. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+queue?queue_state=1queue_text=unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1187500] Re: [Saucy] Unity is slow on Intel graphics

2013-06-11 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Tags added: raring -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1187500 Title: [Saucy] Unity is slow on Intel graphics To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1174444] Re: ps segfault when users have large numbers of group memberships (procps 3.2.8)

2013-06-04 Thread Dave Chiluk
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1150413 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1150413 bug #1150413 does contain a very similar patch. Additionally 4096 was chosen for the buffer size because that is what is in upstream. Alex Handle if that is not enough for you, you may have to compile

[Bug 1150413] Re: Cannot allocate memory if process owned by user with large number of groups

2013-06-04 Thread Dave Chiluk
@doko I came to the similar conclusion of increasing the buffer sizes when looking at bug #117. That issue however resulted in a segfault, but is solved by the same solution. Matthias I know it's not ideal, but we are following what upstream is doing. Can we get your patch sru'ed into

[Bug 1167366] Re: Precise/Raring does not detect proper device (/dev/mapper/isw_something_Volume0p1) during preseed install

2013-05-31 Thread Dave Chiluk
Installation on such a machine can be accomplished through the below sections of a preseed file. Keep in mind this is not a complete preseed file. # Partitioning d-i partman/early_command string debconf-set partman-auto/disk $(ls /dev/mapper/isw* | head -n1) d-i partman-auto/method string

[Bug 1167366] Re: Precise/Raring does not detect proper device (/dev/mapper/isw_something_Volume0p1) during preseed install

2013-05-31 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Changed in: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1167366 Title: Precise/Raring does not detect proper device

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >