[Bug 1948701] Re: Hard system lock under 5.* kernel on standard laptop

2022-03-23 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
It was a mirage. The system is still locking up, something that did not happen with an older kernel, and also not with other systems booting off USB. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1948701] Re: Hard system lock under 5.* kernel on standard laptop

2022-03-20 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Update. And I don't want to jinx it but ... it seems like 22.04 (to be) has this fixed. Updated to it two days ago, and it seems fine with its kernel 5.15.0-23-generic. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1948701] Re: Hard system lock under 5.* kernel on standard laptop

2022-01-04 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Bump. This bug is still open AFAICT. And I just realized that the real cost to me on this machine (which otherwise runs great with the old 4.* kernel) is that I cannot launch Docker containers any more. Which stinks. Machine otherwise happy and stable under 21.10 *provided I run the ancient

[Bug 1948701] Re: Hard system lock under 5.* kernel on standard laptop

2021-10-31 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
If anybody has a hypothesis of what could be causing the lock, I would be game to trying different kernel builds (or parameterizations). So far I mostly glad I can run the machine again, even if it needs a 4.* kernel. Otherwise, is there a particular crash I could enable to diagnose? The

[Bug 1948701] [NEW] Hard system lock under 5.* kernel on standard laptop

2021-10-25 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Public bug reported: This issue appeared first under 21.04, and I (wrongly) suspected a bug in the window manager or graphics stack. I posted on askubuntu at https://askubuntu.com/questions/1346317/ubuntu-21-04-and-21-10-lock- hard-with-basic-gui-redrawing-using-standard-intel-g and even

[Bug 1860601] Re: [SRU] openblas: -Wl, -Bsymbolic-functions should be stripped from LDFLAGS

2020-06-12 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Installed in two stages (first OpenMP, then Pthread) verifying that Rscript -e 'example(solve)'# known example to 'hang' under openblas-pthread now works again. Thanks for the fix! edd@rob:~$ dpkg -l | grep openblas | cut -c -70 ii libopenblas-dev:amd64

[Bug 1868517] Re: Stray /usr/.crates2.json file

2020-06-01 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Seconded. I just edited the two *.list file and hand-removed /usr/.crates.json to have bat and ripgrep coexist. I really shouldn't have to. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868517

[Bug 1870138] Re: svd never finishes

2020-06-01 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Hi Mike et al, Conrad Sanderson of Octave made me aware of the bug report (via this one for the related MLPACK project: https://github.com/mlpack/mlpack/issues/2437). We also saw this issue with R starting in April, the single best thread and collection is https://bugs.debian.org/961725 It

[Bug 1773687] Re: [bionic] no unattended installation

2018-05-29 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Hi Steve, On 30 May 2018 at 00:10, Steve Langasek wrote: | Ok, I see what's happening here. The reason artful doesn't prompt is | because /etc/localtime is prepopulated within the image: | | $ tar tvf ubuntu-artful-core-cloudimg-amd64-root.tar.gz |grep zoneinfo | lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0

[Bug 1773687] Re: [bionic] no unattended installation

2018-05-28 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Hi Steve, On 28 May 2018 at 22:47, Steve Langasek wrote: | This was going to be my recommended approach, as it's the authoritative | way to have a noninteractive install. I haven't had a chance to look | into the package yet given the holiday weekend. Do you think there is a | bug here that

[Bug 1773687] Re: [bionic] no unattended installation

2018-05-28 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Update: A friend just pointed out that setting `export DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive` helps, and I verified that in Docker. So _maybe_ we just dropped that setting? edd@rob:~$ docker run --rm -ti ubuntu:bionic root@cf1720b38f97:/# apt-get update Get:1

[Bug 1773687] Re: [bionic] no unattended installation

2018-05-27 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Also, it is not the package per se but possibly the debconf settings -- installing tzdata_2018e-1 from Debian reveals the same issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1773687 Title:

[Bug 1773687] Re: [bionic] no unattended installation

2018-05-27 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Note that I filed this on my 17.10 machine so the final paragraph is mildly inaccurate. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1773687 Title: [bionic] no unattended installation To manage

[Bug 1773687] [NEW] [bionic] no unattended installation

2018-05-27 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Public bug reported: Package: tzdata Version: 2018d-1 Ubuntu release: 18.04 There appears to be a regression with the preseeding data for tzdata in the 18.04 release. When running apt-get install tzdata I now _always_ drop into an interactive selection of the timezone 'area' and 'zone'.

[Bug 1295267] Re: Windows change Monitor/Desktop after screen lock

2015-07-30 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Update to the last update: on the Radeon-based three-screen setup it seems to happen less than at home. Still moves some windows some times when locking... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1295267] Re: Windows change Monitor/Desktop after screen lock

2015-07-27 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Same here with 15.04 (as well as previous releases for at least a few years; I tend to update every six months). Running two screens with an older NVidia nvs280 (or 285), and now three screens at work with a radeon. So not a chipset issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1243725] Re: Clang++ fails to compile due to wrong path to bits/c++config.h

2013-11-27 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Confirmed -- it also bit me (and I filed it at http://askubuntu.com/questions/383029/clang-version-3-3-lacks-headers before checking here). Sylvestre, the Debian maintainer, states this is fixed in -9. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1244263] Re: ggobi needs porting from libgraph to libcgraph (remove binaries for now)

2013-10-24 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
It still builds fine for me under Debian, incl with the Graphviz-using part. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1244263 Title: ggobi needs porting from libgraph to libcgraph (remove

[Bug 1072720] Re: bti is broken (fix appears to be known)

2012-12-17 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Confirmed. This hit me as well. A simple local rebuild of the package fixed it --- please schedule a binary non-maintainer rebuild. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1072720 Title: bti

[Bug 804171] Re: After latest upgrade of oneiric, Lightdm or Xserver not working

2011-11-01 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Just wanted to confirm that I was bitten by this too running 'do- release-upgrade' from a pretty recent natty install --- and that it was fixed by installing 'unity-greeter'. Should the Recommends: be a Depends? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 548992] Re: Wireless connection frequently drops [deauthenticating by local choice (reason=3)]

2010-07-10 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Quick confirmation of post #13 -- I was seeing the infamous 'deauthenticating from by local choice' and running 'apt-get remove network-manager' fixed it. FWIW this was on my IBM/Lenovo X60 running Debian testing; the netbook running Kubuntu 10.4 is just fine. So a thanks! and tip of the

[Bug 379511] Re: beancounter currency weakness: can't handle lowercase

2010-06-13 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
A patch would be welcome. Should be just a matter of wrapping the 'uc' operator in to upper-case the currency. We do that for the symbol anyway. -- beancounter currency weakness: can't handle lowercase https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/379511 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 379493] Re: beancounter manpage mistook dbname config option for dbsystem

2010-06-13 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Good catch -- fixing that now and a fresh Debian release will be forthcoming. -- beancounter manpage mistook dbname config option for dbsystem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/379493 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 379513] Re: beancounter lacked function to re-activate deactivate-d symbol

2010-06-13 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Doesn't pass my reasonableness check. Stocks get delisted, they rarely ever come back. If it bugs you badly, send me a patch to my normal maintainer / upstream address. -- beancounter lacked function to re-activate deactivate-d symbol https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/379513 You received this bug

[Bug 444639] Re: Unsuccessful grub2 install in amd64 alternate iso for karmic as of Oct 5

2009-10-24 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 23 October 2009 at 22:34, Colin Watson wrote: | Lacking appropriate hardware myself, I'm afraid I'm going to need log | files before I can do anything about this. The necessary logs are | /var/log/installer/syslog and /var/log/installer/partman if you manage | to complete an installation

[Bug 450720] [NEW] R_PDFVIEWER not set in most recent R built in Karmic

2009-10-13 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: r-base This bug was originally reported on the r-sig-debian list (for Debian / Ubuntu user of R). R_PDFVIEWER ends up as being undefined in /etc/R/Revnviron meaning that commands to launch pdf documents fail (unless the user set a pdf viewer option

[Bug 444639] [NEW] Unsuccessful grub2 install in amd64 alternate iso for karmic as of Oct 5

2009-10-06 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: grub2 Using a current amd64 'alternate installer' downloaded yesterday (Oct 5) I had an unsuccessful installation using (hardware) raid and lvm2. The grub2 stage never complete, control went to the foreground menu. Lilo was also unsuccessful. As

Re: [Bug 444639] [NEW] Unsuccessful grub2 install in amd64 alternate iso for karmic as of Oct 5

2009-10-06 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 6 October 2009 at 15:39, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | Public bug reported: | | Binary package hint: grub2 | | Using a current amd64 'alternate installer' downloaded yesterday (Oct 5) | I had an unsuccessful installation using (hardware) raid and lvm2. | | The grub2 stage never complete

Re: [Bug 426360] Re: [PATCH] r-base suppresses ALL error messages forever

2009-09-28 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 25 September 2009 at 21:34, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | On 25 September 2009 at 22:35, Colin Watson wrote: | | On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 05:14:19PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | On 25 September 2009 at 21:55, Colin Watson wrote: | | Although I didn't change it for this upload since I

[Bug 426360] Re: [PATCH] r-base suppresses ALL error messages forever

2009-09-25 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Hi Colin, Thanks for following-up! On 25 September 2009 at 21:55, Colin Watson wrote: | Dirk, do you have a package somewhere that fixes this? Your comments | above inclined me to think that you did, but I don't know where to look. Sorry -- didn't publicize that all that well. It is in the

Re: [Bug 426360] Re: [PATCH] r-base suppresses ALL error messages forever

2009-09-25 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 25 September 2009 at 22:35, Colin Watson wrote: | On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 05:14:19PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | On 25 September 2009 at 21:55, Colin Watson wrote: | | Dirk, do you have a package somewhere that fixes this? Your comments | | above inclined me to think that you did

[Bug 426360] Re: [PATCH] r-base suppresses ALL error messages forever

2009-09-18 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 18 September 2009 at 09:19, spaetz wrote: | no patch as file, but it's a one liner. see: | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/r-base/+bug/426360/comments/1 | | | inlined patch (/etc/R/Rprofile.site): | | -ow - options(warn) | +ow - options(warn,show.error.messages) Correct. I

[Bug 426360] Re: [PATCH] r-base suppresses ALL error messages forever

2009-09-09 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Thanks for the bug report and fix -- I concur. This was an oversight, and we will apply the promptly. Thanks also to whoever subscribed me to this today Dirk -- [PATCH] r-base suppresses ALL error messages forever https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426360 You received this bug notification

[Bug 426360] Re: [PATCH] r-base suppresses ALL error messages forever

2009-09-09 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Thanks for the bug report and fix -- I concur. This was an oversight, and we will apply the fix promptly. Thanks also to whoever subscribed me to this today Dirk -- [PATCH] r-base suppresses ALL error messages forever https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426360 You received this bug

[Bug 247207] Re: zabbix-agent init script error

2009-03-11 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Same here too -- oddly enough, that did not always prevent zabbix-agent from running. On one machine I manually did a cd /var/run sudo mv zabbix-server zabbix-agent and started zabbix-agent. On another machine that seems to have happened by itself. Dirk -- zabbix-agent init script

[Bug 248150] Re: package r-cran-fcalendar 220.10063-1 failed to install/upgrade:

2008-08-06 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 6 August 2008 at 12:53, Luca Falavigna wrote: | Will this SRU involve 32 source packages? Impossible to say. Actually may be best. Worst-case is 32, yes. | Does fix from Debian 410951 solve this issue? Maybe. You'll need to test -- we don't usually have upgrades skipping several releases.

Re: [Bug 248150] Re: package r-cran-fcalendar 220.10063-1 failed to install/upgrade:

2008-08-06 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 01:14:17PM -, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: On 6 August 2008 at 12:53, Luca Falavigna wrote: | Will this SRU involve 32 source packages? Impossible to say. Actually may be best. Worst-case is 32, yes. Sorry: Actually may be best to test. is what I meant to write

Re: [Bug 234837] Re: Binutils corrupts Open MPI

2008-06-16 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 01:31:53PM -, ilmarw wrote: I know, but I find it annoying to having to edit /etc/openmpi/openmpi- mca-params.conf, and since it is disabled in openmpi i newer versions it could as well be removed. Our (as in Debian Open MPI maintainers in discussion with upstream)

[Bug 182112] Re: ess new version available

2008-06-15 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
ESS is now again actively maintained in Debian; I am part of the maintainer group. We'd be happy for someone from Ubuntu to join. Just email us. Regards, Dirk -- ess new version available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182112 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

Re: [Bug 234837] Re: Binutils corrupts Open MPI

2008-06-15 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 07:30:25PM -, Cesare Tirabassi wrote: ** Also affects: openmpi (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: New = Invalid Care to

[Bug 234837] Re: Binutils corrupts Open MPI

2008-06-15 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 15 June 2008 at 19:53, Steffen Neumann wrote: | I can add that the problem has been introduced somewhere | within the hardy development time. We have a machine | that has been installed around february/march with a then-current hardy. | This includes a working OpenMPI package. The update to

[Bug 234837] Re: Binutils corrupts Open MPI

2008-06-15 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
: From: Dirk Eddelbuettel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Cesare Tirabassi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SUSPECT: Re: [Rd] Rmpi segfault after install on Ubuntu Hardy Heron Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 07:27:37 -0500 and exim4 had no issues as far as I can see 2008-06-13 07:27:37 1K78NV-00078e-Jd

[Bug 234837] Re: Binutils corrupts Open MPI

2008-06-15 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Just back in from a long run... On 15 June 2008 at 22:49, Cesare Tirabassi wrote: | Well, by looking at your buildd build log your default LDFLAGS is | while we do use -Wl,-Bsymbolic. That'll do to break the package, I suppose! | I guess you never received my emails as | I was explaining that

Re: [Rd] Rmpi segfault after install on Ubuntu Hardy Heron

2008-06-12 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
maintainer, so I am not sure who to talk to. I'll forward a copy of this to the Ubuntu folks. As an aside, the Debian packages all work. Dirk | Thanks to all for the helpful comments. | Mark | | On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | | On 11 June 2008 at 00

[Bug 234837] [NEW] Binutils corrupts Open MPI

2008-05-25 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: binutils I think I found a bad bug in hardy. I do not know what it is, but I can pin it down. It involves Open MPI when used with R via the Rmpi add-on package for R. And I think it points to the toolchain, hence filed against binutils. This may of

[Bug 219245] Re: libRblas missing in r-base 64 bit HARDY

2008-04-18 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
First off, where do you get R from: Ubuntu or CRAN or self-built? Which version? What does 'ldd /usr/lib/R/bin/exec/R' say? I suspect you are simply mixing a 'newer' R build with an older r-cran-* package expecting the older Blas / Lapack / Atlas setup. If I were you, I'd uninstall

[Bug 93924] Re: rpy package missing files

2007-03-19 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Updating to Debian package 1.0-rc1-4 (dated Dec 27, 2006) will fix this as RPy then recognises R 2.4.1. While at it, update to 1.0-rc1-5 which fixes an annoying bug with x11 updates occassionally crashing rpy. Dirk (R/Rpy maintainer for Debian) -- rpy package missing files

Re: [Bug 68452] Re: jpilot-syncmal trashes Avantgo settings after Edgy update

2006-12-04 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 4 December 2006 at 08:26, John McCreesh wrote: | I've had an email from Jason Day: | | I believe I've got this fixed now. I can't send you a binary, but if | you are comfortable building packages from source here is where you can | download a preview: | |

[Bug 68452] Re: jpilot-syncmal trashes Avantgo settings after Edgy update

2006-11-04 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
I can confirm this -- same buggy behavior on my Edgy/6.06 system that has been upgraded continuously via the previous two release. Advice on how to fix this, or how to workaround it, would be welcome. Dirk -- jpilot-syncmal trashes Avantgo settings after Edgy update