Build was successful, new package was uploaded ...
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Changed in: qclib (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Test build started in this PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~fheimes/+archive/ubuntu/lp2073082
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073082
Title:
Upgrade qclib to latest version v2.5.0
To
** Summary changed:
- Revert back frame pointers for s390x (remove -fno-omit-framepointer but use
-mbackchain)
+ Revert back frame pointers for s390x (remove -fno-omit-frame-pointer but use
-mbackchain)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Summary changed:
- Revert back frame pointers for ppc64el (remove -fno-omit-framepointer)
+ Revert back frame pointers for ppc64el (remove -fno-omit-frame-pointer)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
See also: #2071778
Some programs fixed the slow loading by switching compression algorithms
to lzo. Much faster but a bit bigger images, maybe that would work here
as well?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
only now find that it is a duplicate of #2027904
Except there is no mentioning of the compression algorithm in #2027904
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071778
Title:
libreoffice calc
** Changed in: qclib (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073082
Title:
: Frank Heimes (fheimes)
Status: New
** Tags: s390x
** Also affects: qclib (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: qclib (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Frank Heimes (fheimes)
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Assignee: Frank Heimes (fhei
Patch was submitted to kernel teams mailing list (thx Patricia):
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2024-July/thread.html#152124
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: linux
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Patricia Domingues (patriciasd)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070358
Title:
[Ubuntu 24.04] FW1060.00 (NH1060_026)
Great, thx for your validation, Cody!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072366
Title:
s390-tools zipl breaks when user provides target attributes
To manage notifications about this
I see Benjamin - thought that I had accidentally removed it by updating
the bug (since it was still there in my old browser tab), removed it
again.
(Btw. looks like comment #10 is an iisue with the bugzilla-launchpad
bridge ...)
** No longer affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
** No longer
Many thx Andreas for the quick validation!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982335
Title:
[24.10 FEAT] Valgrind: Support for new IBM Z Hardware (IBM z16)
To manage notifications
@vorlon yes, that's correct. (This bug became a bit abandoned ...)
I just changed the target release to oracular and set s390-tools to Fix
Released.
** Also affects: s390-tools (Ubuntu Oracular)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Skipper Bug Screeners (skipper-screen-team)
Status: New
Where are the initramfs-tools gone? Added it again ... (sorry)
** Also affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Tags added: pe-sponsoring-request
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072366
Title:
s390-tools zipl breaks when user provides target attributes
To manage notifications about this bug
** Tags added: pe-sponsoring-request
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982335
Title:
[24.10 FEAT] Valgrind: Support for new IBM Z Hardware (IBM z16)
To manage notifications about this
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064539
Title:
Revert back frame pointers for ppc64el (remove
I'm closing this ticket as Fix Released, since the Ubuntu kernel 6.8.0-38 just
transitioned from -proposed to -updates (and -security):
linux-generic | 6.8.0-38.38| noble-security| amd64, arm64,
armhf, ppc64el, s390x
linux-generic | 6.8.0-38.38| noble-proposed|
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064538
Title:
Revert back frame pointers for s390x (remove
ess
** Changed in: valgrind (Ubuntu)
Status: Expired => In Progress
** Information type changed from Private to Public
** Changed in: valgrind (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Frank Heimes (fheimes)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bu
** Attachment added: "debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/valgrind/+bug/1982335/+attachment/5795842/+files/valgring_oracular_from_3.22.0-0ubuntu3_to_3.23.0-0ubuntu1.diff.gz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Great, that it was added to stable 5.15 - thx!
(In the upstream commit I only found:
Fixes: a3efa8429266 ("KVM: s390: gen_facilities: allow facilities 165, 193, 194
and 196")
would have also assumed to see a line starting with:
Cc: # ...
But anyway, very happy that it comes to 5.15 via
I unfortunately don't see that 4c6abb7f7b34 "KVM: s390: fix LPSWEY
handling" got upstream marked as stable update, since in such a case it
would have been picked by the Canonical kernel team automatically.
** Also affects: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed
Would it be possible to get a test case aka reproducer on this (so
forcing the system into such a rare case)? Since we would need a kind of
a test for a potential SRU.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Tags added: s390x
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072540
Title:
rustc: "backchain" on IBM Z platforms is considered unsafe by Rust
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Excuse me Kowshik Jois, you can safely ignore the last few comments from
"Ubuntu Kernel Bot (ubuntu-kernel-bot)".
After a bug like this is already in Fix Released state, the fix was already
published and is out and there is nothing more to do.
(The msgs are kind of spam from our kernel team's
> > (But btw. why have you attached your Intel ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt
here?)
> I used ubuntu-bug to file the bug, and it collected that
automatically. It's irrelevant, I've removed it.
I see...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
** Tags added: reverse-proxy-bugzilla
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Assignee: (unassigned) => bugproxy (bugproxy)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064538
Title:
Revert back
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Assignee: (unassigned) => bugproxy (bugproxy)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071774
Title:
zfs-dkms FTBFS on Linux 6.10/s390x
To manage
ed (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: s390-tools-signed (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: s390-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Frank Heimes (fheimes)
** Changed in: s390-tools-signed (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Frank Hei
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: s390-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072366
Title:
Thx Cody for this report and you investigation upstream.
An update package, with the above fix included, is currently building in the
following PPA:
launchpad.net/~fheimes/+archive/ubuntu/lp2072366
(But btw. why have you attached your Intel ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt here?)
--
You received this
** Tags added: s390x
** Also affects: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Assignee: (unassigned) => Skipper Bug Screeners (skipper-screen-team)
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in:
The debdiffs ...
** Attachment added: "debdiffs.tgz"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/2072257/+attachment/5794862/+files/debdiffs.tgz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Test builds have been completed and successfully tested (I was
especially concerned regarding zipl) - see attachment.
** Attachment added: "2072257_verification.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/2072257/+attachment/5794861/+files/2072257_verification.txt
--
You received
Test builds are currently building in this PPA:
launchpad.net/~fheimes/+archive/ubuntu/lp2072257
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072257
Title:
s390-tools: fail to build after
-signed (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: s390-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Frank Heimes (fheimes)
** Changed in: s390-tools-signed (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassig
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071471
Title:
[UBUNTU 24.04] IOMMU DMA mode changed in kernel config
Great ! - Thank you:
$ rmadison --arch=ppc64el dotnet8
dotnet8 | 8.0.105-8.0.5-0ubuntu2 | oracular | ppc64el
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064530
Title:
Include support for .NET 8
** Tags added: s390x
** Also affects: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags added: reverse-proxy-bugzilla
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071774
Title:
Many thanks for confirming, Niklas!
** Description changed:
SRU Justification:
[Impact]
* With the introduction of c76c067e488c "s390/pci: Use dma-iommu layer"
(upstream with since kernel v6.7-rc1) there was a move (on s390x only)
to a different dma-iommu implementation.
Well, 'make defconfig' is what I cannot use, since we have the Ubuntu specific
kernel options (and tools).
But since "not set" defaults to no, I guess it should be okay to explicitly set
CONFIG_IOMMU_DEFAULT_DMA_STRICT=n.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Modification was sent to kernel teams mailing list:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2024-July/thread.html#151928
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Canonical Kernel Team (canonical-kernel-team)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Description changed:
SRU Justification:
[Impact]
- * With the introduction of c76c067e488c "s390/pci: Use dma-iommu layer"
-(upstream with since kernel v6.7-rc1) there was a move (on s390x only)
-to a different dma-iommu implementation.
+ * With the introduction of
** Description changed:
+ SRU Justification:
+
+ [Impact]
+
+ * With the introduction of c76c067e488c "s390/pci: Use dma-iommu layer"
+(upstream with since kernel v6.7-rc1) there was a move (on s390x only)
+to a different dma-iommu implementation.
+
+ * And with 92bce97f0c34
Looks like it's not sufficient to have IOMMU_DEFAULT_DMA_LAZY=y only
in addition IOMMU_DEFAULT_DMA_STRICT=n seems to be needed on top (otherwise the
build failed for me).
(Which I think is not super great upstream, one option should be fine -- with
the two kernel options, there are now two
Public bug reported:
Since i started using snaps for libreoffice (after upgrading to ubuntu
24lts) calc starts terribly slow. It takes 8 seconds. If i close calc
and restart calc it takes again 8 seconds. It used to be least half that
time, and restarting was almost instantaneous.
Some research
So the NFS problem that was reported in LP#2060217 is already addressed and is
fixed in the Ubuntu Kernel 6.8.0-38.
But kernel 6.8.0-38 is not yet fully rolled out - it's currently in the
"-proposed" pocket of the Ubuntu archive, but can already be tested and used.
However, the way to install
Hi Niklas, thanks for the backgrounds.
So to sum it up:
The Ubuntu kernel config options for IOMMU_DEFAULT_DMA_LAZY and
IOMMU_DEFAULT_DMA_STRICT haven't changed since jammy/22.04:
5.15.0-1.1 to 5.15.0-115.125
CONFIG_IOMMU_DEFAULT_DMA_STRICT=y
# CONFIG_IOMMU_DEFAULT_DMA_LAZY is not set
Hello Tasmiya, many thanks that you retried with latest kernel -36.
So we'll focus then on incl. commit
8e948c365d9c nfsd: fix oops when reading pool_stats before server is started
I just noticed that it's now upstream with v6.10-rc5.
** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu)
Status: New =>
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071471
Title:
[UBUNTU 24.04] IOMMU DMA mode changed in kernel config causes massive
throughput degradation for PCI-related network workloads
To
Btw. I just checked the jammy kernel config options and jammy/22.04 had and
still has strict=yes:
$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS
Release:22.04
Codename: jammy
$ uname -a
Linux maasrrc1 5.15.0-112-generic
I just had a look at the Ubuntu kernel noble master-next tree and can find
commit:
"Revert "s390: update defconfigs"" under the hash b2b97a62f055
and I can see that it got reverted with that:
$ git show b2b97a62f055 | grep CONFIG_IOMMU_DEFAULT_DMA_STRICT
CONFIG_IOMMU_DEFAULT_DMA_STRICT
** Also affects: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071471
Title:
[UBUNTU 24.04] IOMMU DMA mode changed in kernel config
Uploading the debdiff of the s390-tools-signed package with a fix for a
typo in the changelog.
** Patch added:
"debdiff_s390-tools-signed_from_2.31.0-0ubuntu5_to_2.33.1-0ubuntu1.diff"
Looks like the names changed slightly, thanks for pointing the the right
upstream commits!
And I see that they are marked as stable updates ("Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org #
v6.7+"), which is great!
With that they will be soon automatically be picked up by the Canonical kernel
team.
** Changed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067383
Title:
[Ubuntu 24.04] hotplug of 68 or more cpus is making the guest shutoff!
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Hello and thanks for having reported this issue.
I was able to find patch "KVM: PPC: Book3S HV nestedv2: Cancel pending
DEC exception" accepted in the 'linux-next' tree
(7be6ce7043b4cf293c8826a48fd9f56931cef2cf).
Do you know if it got also upstream marked for stable updates, and with that
will
Hello and thanks for having reported this issue.
Once the patch set 'Fix doorbell emulation for v2 API on PPC' with patches:
- arch/powerpc/kvm: Add DPDES support in helper library for Guest state buffer
- arch/powerpc/kvm: Fix doorbell emulation for v2 API
are upstream accepted (having them in
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Hello and thanks for having reported this issue.
Once the patch "nfsd: fix oops when reading pool_stats before server is
started" is upstream accepted (having it in 'linux-next' is sufficient), we can
think about picking it.
Do you know if it will be marked upstream as stable update, and with
** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu) => sosreport (Ubuntu)
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: ubuntu-power-systems
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Ubuntu on IBM Power Systems Bug
Meanwhile commit e03b893fca6d "NFSD: fix endianness issue in
nfsd4_encode_fattr4" (by Vasily Gorbik, that fixes fce7913b13d0 "NFSD: Use a
bitmask loop to encode FATTR4 results") has landed in the Ubuntu kernel
"Ubuntu-6.8.0-38.38" (for noble) and is currently in -proposed:
linux-generic |
Yes, sure the NFS issue is reported here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060217
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068577
Title:
[UBUNTU 24.04] Running sosreport causes the system to
Hello, first of all I'm glad reading that this is now solved for you.
I'm still wondering and a bit curious what this has initially caused in your
environment...
Anyway, happy that the upgrade to the latest update levels has solved
this (and since this is recommended to do anyway, to have a
** Also affects: ubuntu-power-systems
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu on IBM Power Systems Bug Triage
(ubuntu-power-triage)
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in:
** Description changed:
Ubuntu 24.04 with Wayland
A bug was reported to SDL regarding a client app sporadically not
getting the correct dimensions when entering fullscreen. The original
report is here: https://github.com/libsdl-org/SDL/issues/
The client application is
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu 24.04 with Wayland
A bug was reported to SDL regarding a client app sporadically not
getting the correct dimensions when entering fullscreen. The original
report is here: https://github.com/libsdl-org/SDL/issues/
The client application is initially creating a
Hello, as far as I can see (and I just double checked at github.com/qemu) the
patch set
PATCH v2 - "target/ppc: vcpu hotplug failure handling fixes" (4 parts)
is still not upstream accepted - not in 9.0.1 (latest) nor in master (commit
list).
(But please, correct me if I'm wrong, in case the
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069035
Title:
[24.10] Please test secure-boot and lockdown on the 6.10 kernel
Thanks Adrien, I was just also digging into this and found that jammy was the
last release where the package existed:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2069129/+subscriptions
(interesting to see what you are working on instead)
Meanwhile I've updated the status of this ticket
... and I just found that it got deleted starting with kinetic/22.10
incl. rationale provided by vorlon:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/crypto-policies/20190816git-1/+publishinghistory
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Many thanks Grgo for the test, and the blazing fast turnaround !
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069035
Title:
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems
Assignee: Skipper Bug Screeners (skipper-screen-team) => Ubuntu on IBM
Power Systems Bug Triage (ubuntu-power-triage)
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Public bug reported:
The architectural level set for ppc64el is generally Power 9.
But it turned out that glibc is still compiled for Power 8.
This should be changed to Power 9.
** Affects: ubuntu-power-systems
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Ubuntu on IBM Power Systems Bug Triage
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Assignee: (unassigned) => bugproxy (bugproxy)
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: Undecided => High
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Tags
I've worked on some more lintian warning, polishing the package a bit more and
have now an updated debdiff (just for s390-tools; s390-tools-signed didn't
change):
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/734514167/s390-tools_2.31.0-0ubuntu5_2.33.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz
and also did a new test build in PPA that
Public bug reported:
Upgrade to 24.04 hung on updating thunderbird to snap.
Was unable to boot after upgrade was interrupted.
Booted to command line, enabled networking, initiated repair. Upgrade completed.
Was able to boot normally.
On first run of thunderbird got an error. Reported said I had
on a related note - ceph 19 hasn't been formally released - why is 19
the version that is included in 24.04 LTS, instead of version 18 "reef"?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063456
Is there any movement on this for 24.04 LTS? still having the same issue on a
fresh install
installed:
cephadm/noble,now 19.2.0~git20240301.4c76c50-0ubuntu6 amd64 [installed]
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
On top I've noticed that there are probably nfs shares active in your system
(saw that in fstab).
There is an open issue with nfs.
Would you mind tearing down (and removing nfs) temporarily and for test reasons
and run sosreport then again?
--
You received this bug notification because you are
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065579
Title:
[UBUNTU 22.04] OS guest boot issues on 9p filesystem
To manage
Thanks for having reported this issue.
I tried to recreate this on the systems that I have at hand (which is a z13 in
PS/SM mode and a LinuxONE 3 in DPM mode) and ran sosreport twice on both
systems in an LPAR, with a default 24.04 install, and after having 24.04
upgraded to the latest level
** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu) => sosreport (Ubuntu)
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Hello, is there already a list of (kernel) commits that are required?
(So that we can check whether they are incl. in the Ubuntu kernel or not; and
in case not do the submissions to the Ubuntu kernel team.)
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu on IBM Power
Since this is about a new ppc64el specific tool ("secvarctl", that does not yet
exists in LP),
I'll marked this ticket as temp. affecting "powerpc-utils", until we have a
first upload.
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu on IBM Power Systems Bug Triage
I'm assuming that this is the upstream repository of 'secvarctl':
https://github.com/open-power/secvarctl
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064345
Title:
Power guest secure boot with
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Please let me jump in (for TZ reasons).
The patch "debian/patches/ubuntu/lp-2065579-9pfs-allow-sockets.patch"
(as always referenced in debin/changelog) that Sergio created and that
is incl. in the PPA build is this:
From: Sergio Durigan Junior
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 16:45:56 -0400
Subject:
Test build is available in PPA lp2067355:
https://launchpad.net/~fheimes/+archive/ubuntu/lp2067355
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067355
Title:
Update s390-tools to (currently
** Patch added:
"debdiff_s390-tools-signed_from_2.31.0-0ubuntu5_to_2.33.1-0ubuntu1.diff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/s390-tools/+bug/2067355/+attachment/5784042/+files/debdiff_s390-tools-signed_from_2.31.0-0ubuntu5_to_2.33.1-0ubuntu1.diff
** Changed in: s390-tools (Ubuntu)
** Attachment added:
"debdiff_s390-tools_from_2.31.0-0ubuntu5_to_2.33.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/s390-tools/+bug/2067355/+attachment/5784041/+files/debdiff_s390-tools_from_2.31.0-0ubuntu5_to_2.33.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz
--
You received this bug notification
** Summary changed:
- [Ubuntu24.04] hotplug of 68 or more cpus is making the guest shutoff!
+ [Ubuntu 24.04] hotplug of 68 or more cpus is making the guest shutoff!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Also affects: ubuntu-power-systems
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu on IBM Power Systems Bug Triage
(ubuntu-power-triage)
** Changed in: qemu (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Ubuntu on IBM Power Systems Bug Triage
Okay, thanks Vineeth for jumping in!
In other words this will become unblocked once we have s390-tools >=
2.33.0 in, which I am currently working on (v2.33.1 - based on
LP#2067355).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Assignee: Skipper Bug Screeners (skipper-screen-team)
Status: New
** Affects: s390-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Frank Heimes (fheimes)
Status: New
** Affects: s390-tools-signed (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Frank Heimes (fheimes
Hi Peter,
is this now incl. in s390-tools v2.33.0
https://github.com/ibm-s390-linux/s390-tools/releases/tag/v2.33.0
and what I read as:
"chzdev: Add --is-owner to identify files created by zdev"
?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Hi Stefan (in reply to LP comment #18:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2038583/comments/18),
this is now tracked here: LP#2067350 (https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067350)
since it is a bit more effort than just removing libc6-s390 and libc6-dev-s390,
due to their reverse
Public bug reported:
Last cycle there was the effort to turn off COMPAT_32BIT_TIME on s390x (but
also on other architectures, LP#2038583).
Based on this effort it was agreed to not only turn off 32-bit time but 32-bit
(for the mainframe platform, that is technically 31-bit) entirely.
Two major
1 - 100 of 9928 matches
Mail list logo
