[Bug 1774957] Re: Network icons in status menu disappearing

2019-03-18 Thread Ian McMichael
Looking good on 18.04.1 LTS Desktop. I have installed the patch from comment #23 and the network icon now appears consistently on both the status bar and the status menu. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1774957] Re: Network icons in status menu disappearing

2019-02-17 Thread Ian McMichael
According to https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/140 this is fixed in Gnome Shell 3.30.1 & 3.28.4. Any chance of getting 3.28.4 (or the fix) in 18.04 LTS desktop? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1814403] Re: Latest update causes 30 sec. menu delay timeout

2019-02-11 Thread Ian McMichael
I have an 18.04.2 desktop installation running grub2 2.02-2ubuntu8.12, which is still pausing for 30 seconds at the grub menu on every boot. The system is UEFI and running secure boot, with nVidia binary drivers if that matters? The disk is an NVMe drive with two partitions. The first is

[Bug 1742286] Re: [regression] Xenial host with 4.4.0-108.131 fails to power some KVM guests

2018-01-10 Thread Ian McMichael
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1741934 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1741934 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1741934 Kernel trace with xenial 4.4 (4.4.0-108.131, Candidate kernels for PTI fix) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1742323] Re: Meltdown Update Kernel doesnt boot

2018-01-10 Thread Ian McMichael
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1741934 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1741934 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1741934 Kernel trace with xenial 4.4 (4.4.0-108.131, Candidate kernels for PTI fix) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1742330] Re: Can't reboot, shutdown or suspend with 4.4.0-108

2018-01-10 Thread Ian McMichael
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1741934 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1741934 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1741934 Kernel trace with xenial 4.4 (4.4.0-108.131, Candidate kernels for PTI fix) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1742333] Re: Can't reboot, shutdown, or suspend with 4.4.0-108-generic

2018-01-10 Thread Ian McMichael
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1741934 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1741934 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1742330 Can't reboot, shutdown or suspend with 4.4.0-108 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1741934 Kernel trace with xenial 4.4

[Bug 1742386] Re: Crash at startup

2018-01-10 Thread Ian McMichael
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1741934 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1741934 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1742323 Meltdown Update Kernel doesnt boot ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1741934 Kernel trace with xenial 4.4 (4.4.0-108.131, Candidate

[Bug 1742392] Re: reboot fails after update to kernel 4.4.0-108

2018-01-10 Thread Ian McMichael
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1741934 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1741934 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1742323 Meltdown Update Kernel doesnt boot ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1741934 Kernel trace with xenial 4.4 (4.4.0-108.131, Candidate

[Bug 1421184] Re: Merge latest version (2.48.3-1) with Debian

2016-03-19 Thread Ian McMichael
Having read through the Debian notes it appears unlikely that 2.40 will ever compile and work against the newer OCaml library in 16.04 LTS. However, 2.48 does fine. There was some question about whether this would work in 14.04 LTS. I have carried out a test using a 14.04 LTS server and a 16.04

[Bug 1319320] Re: samba does not provide netlogon infos

2015-09-09 Thread Ian McMichael
It appears this was fixed with the patch https://attachments.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=9882 in Samba bug 10524 (https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10524) against their 4.1 code base. Is there any chance in getting this applied to the 14.04 LTS Samba release or the Utopic release

[Bug 1319320] Re: samba does not provide netlogon infos

2015-09-09 Thread Ian McMichael
It appears this was fixed with the patch https://attachments.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=9882 in Samba bug 10524 (https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10524) against their 4.1 code base. Is there any chance in getting this applied to the 14.04 LTS Samba release or the Utopic release

[Bug 1186662] Re: isc-dhcp-server fails to renew lease file

2015-05-13 Thread Ian McMichael
I've given up with my solution in #9 as it did not work. I'm still using 14.04 LTS systems and now employ the following fix instead: service isc-dhcp-server stop setfacl -dm u:dhcpd:rwx /var/lib/dhcp setfacl -m u:dhcpd:rwx /var/lib/dhcp service isc-dhcp-server start Note: For this to work you

[Bug 1281588] Re: Disk standby timer is broken

2015-01-19 Thread Ian McMichael
Is there any chance of a backport to 14.04 LTS for this patch? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1281588 Title: Disk standby timer is broken To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1186662] Re: isc-dhcp-server fails to renew lease file

2014-06-19 Thread Ian McMichael
Rather annoyingly, this still seems to be present in 14.04 LTS after all these years! The following seems to fix it (at least until the isc- dhcp-server package gets updated): - Stop the DHCP server (service isc-dhcp-server stop) - chown -R dhcpd:dhcpd /var/lib/dhcp - Edit

[Bug 1290448] Re: Invalid Opcode when running samba-tool domain exportkeytab

2014-03-20 Thread Ian McMichael
In case it assists when this bug gets triaged, I've repeated my build today with Samba 2:4.1.6+dfsg-1 from Jessie and this bug is also not present in the 4.1.6 release, which includes security fixes over 4.1.5. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team,

[Bug 1290448] Re: Invalid Opcode when running samba-tool domain exportkeytab

2014-03-20 Thread Ian McMichael
In case it assists when this bug gets triaged, I've repeated my build today with Samba 2:4.1.6+dfsg-1 from Jessie and this bug is also not present in the 4.1.6 release, which includes security fixes over 4.1.5. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1290448] Re: Invalid Opcode when running samba-tool domain exportkeytab

2014-03-11 Thread Ian McMichael
As this bug stops an other application using the Kerberos details stored in the Samba directory, it is quite a show-stopper for the Trusty release. Is there anything I can tag this bug with or anyone I should notify in an attempt to get 4.1.5 pulled from Jessie for the Trusty release? -- You

[Bug 1290448] Re: Invalid Opcode when running samba-tool domain exportkeytab

2014-03-11 Thread Ian McMichael
As this bug stops an other application using the Kerberos details stored in the Samba directory, it is quite a show-stopper for the Trusty release. Is there anything I can tag this bug with or anyone I should notify in an attempt to get 4.1.5 pulled from Jessie for the Trusty release? -- You

[Bug 1290448] [NEW] Invalid Opcode when running samba-tool domain exportkeytab

2014-03-10 Thread Ian McMichael
Public bug reported: To reproduce this bug, carry out the following: Install a fresh Trust Tahr 14.04 AMD64 development build in a (KVM) virtual machine as a basic server. Install the samba (2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3) and bind9 packages. Provision an Active Directory Domain with the following

[Bug 1290448] Re: Invalid Opcode when running samba-tool domain exportkeytab

2014-03-10 Thread Ian McMichael
I've just upgraded Samba to 2:4.1.5+dfsg-1 from the Debian Jessie repository. This also forced the following updates: 2014-03-10 17:13:00 upgrade python-samba:amd64 2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 2:4.1.5+dfsg-1 2014-03-10 17:13:00 upgrade samba-dsdb-modules:amd64 2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 2:4.1.5+dfsg-1

[Bug 1290448] [NEW] Invalid Opcode when running samba-tool domain exportkeytab

2014-03-10 Thread Ian McMichael
Public bug reported: To reproduce this bug, carry out the following: Install a fresh Trust Tahr 14.04 AMD64 development build in a (KVM) virtual machine as a basic server. Install the samba (2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3) and bind9 packages. Provision an Active Directory Domain with the following

[Bug 1290448] Re: Invalid Opcode when running samba-tool domain exportkeytab

2014-03-10 Thread Ian McMichael
I've just upgraded Samba to 2:4.1.5+dfsg-1 from the Debian Jessie repository. This also forced the following updates: 2014-03-10 17:13:00 upgrade python-samba:amd64 2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 2:4.1.5+dfsg-1 2014-03-10 17:13:00 upgrade samba-dsdb-modules:amd64 2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 2:4.1.5+dfsg-1

[Bug 936190] CurrentDmesg.txt

2013-08-24 Thread Ian McMichael
apport information ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936190/+attachment/3786226/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936190

[Bug 936190] ProcEnviron.txt

2013-08-24 Thread Ian McMichael
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcEnviron.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936190/+attachment/3786229/+files/ProcEnviron.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936190

[Bug 936190] ProcCpuinfo.txt

2013-08-24 Thread Ian McMichael
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936190/+attachment/3786228/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936190

[Bug 936190] UdevLog.txt

2013-08-24 Thread Ian McMichael
apport information ** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936190/+attachment/3786234/+files/UdevLog.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936190 Title:

[Bug 936190] Re: nForce 590 USB power regression in 3.0.0-16 and 3.2.0-24

2013-08-24 Thread Ian McMichael
As requested the test was re-run in the latest Saucy daily. The results are attached above. The issue still exists if a mass storage USB device is connected to the nForce 590 USB controller. If only HID devices are attached then they all power off correctly at shutdown. -- You received this

[Bug 936190] UdevDb.txt

2013-08-24 Thread Ian McMichael
apport information ** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936190/+attachment/3786233/+files/UdevDb.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936190 Title:

[Bug 936190] PulseList.txt

2013-08-24 Thread Ian McMichael
apport information ** Attachment added: PulseList.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936190/+attachment/3786232/+files/PulseList.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936190 Title:

[Bug 936190] Re: nForce 590 USB power regression in 3.0.0-16 and 3.2.0-24

2013-08-24 Thread Ian McMichael
apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected saucy ** Description changed: Following on from bug #787590, it appears that with the release of the 3.0.0-16 kernel a regression has occurred and the problem is present again. I thought the patch had been adopted into the mainstream

[Bug 936190] Lspci.txt

2013-08-24 Thread Ian McMichael
apport information ** Attachment added: Lspci.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936190/+attachment/3786227/+files/Lspci.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936190 Title: nForce

[Bug 936190] ProcInterrupts.txt

2013-08-24 Thread Ian McMichael
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936190/+attachment/3786230/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 936190] CRDA.txt

2013-08-24 Thread Ian McMichael
apport information ** Attachment added: CRDA.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936190/+attachment/3786225/+files/CRDA.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936190 Title: nForce

[Bug 936190] WifiSyslog.txt

2013-08-24 Thread Ian McMichael
apport information ** Attachment added: WifiSyslog.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936190/+attachment/3786235/+files/WifiSyslog.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936190

[Bug 936190] ProcModules.txt

2013-08-24 Thread Ian McMichael
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936190/+attachment/3786231/+files/ProcModules.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936190

[Bug 936190] BootDmesg.txt

2013-08-24 Thread Ian McMichael
apport information ** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936190/+attachment/3786224/+files/BootDmesg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936190 Title:

[Bug 936190] Re: nForce 590 USB power regression in 3.0.0-16 and 3.2.0-24

2012-08-11 Thread Ian McMichael
Further information has come to light today. I'm now running 3.2.0-29 (PAE) on the same platform. This does not exhibit the USB controller power shut-down bug unless as mass storage device is connected. My USB memory card reader or a USB stick left connected to the motherboard at kernel

[Bug 936190] Re: nForce 590 USB power regression in 3.0.0-16

2012-06-27 Thread Ian McMichael
All was well in Precise (12.04 LTS) for a while. Up to and including 3.2.0-23 correctly powered off the USB controller at shutdown. Now from -24 (including -25) the bug has appeared. Should I file another bug for Precise or update this one in some way now the problem is present here too? I'm

[Bug 856172] Re: indicator-weather crashed with SIGSEGV in dbusmenu_menuitem_build_variant()

2012-04-18 Thread Ian McMichael
Just experienced the same issue using the daily build of 12.04 LTS (32 bit) released today. Seemed to occur while doing a background data update for the Basingstoke, England weather from Yahoo. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 936190] Re: nForce 590 USB power regression in 3.0.0-16

2012-03-28 Thread Ian McMichael
Also still present in this morning's update: Linux custard 3.0.0-17-generic #30-Ubuntu SMP Thu Mar 8 17:34:21 UTC 2012 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936190

[Bug 936190] Re: nForce 590 USB power regression in 3.0.0-16

2012-03-09 Thread Ian McMichael
Just to let you know that this regression is also present on the latest security release of the kernel this morning: Linux custard 3.0.0-16-generic #29-Ubuntu SMP Tue Feb 14 12:49:42 UTC 2012 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 936190] Re: nForce 590 USB power regression in 3.0.0-16

2012-02-28 Thread Ian McMichael
The last kernel running on this machine was: Linux custard 3.0.0-15-generic #26-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jan 20 15:59:53 UTC 2012 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux When shutdown this previous kernel correctly powers down the USB ports. So, it looks like the quirk for the 590 chipset is still needed. Is there

[Bug 936190] [NEW] nForce 590 USB power regression in 3.0.0-16

2012-02-19 Thread Ian McMichael
Public bug reported: Following on from bug #787590, it appears that with the release of the 3.0.0-16 kernel a regression has occurred and the problem is present again. I thought the patch had been adopted into the mainstream kernel but for some reason it does not appear to have made it into the

[Bug 936190] Re: nForce 590 USB power regression in 3.0.0-16

2012-02-19 Thread Ian McMichael
** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #35032 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35032 ** Also affects: linux via http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35032 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 755791] Re: [RS690M] No 3d acceleration in Radeon X1200 with new Gallium r300 / 3d drivers in 11.04 (Needs kernel quirk)

2011-11-27 Thread Ian McMichael
OK, I spoke too early in my last post. The machine was working fine all day Thursday with the official 3.0.0-13-generic kernel. Then when I booted it on Friday morning, lightdm displayed fine but the UI froze logging into any account with a background bitmap and mouse cursor. Unity did not

[Bug 755791] Re: [RS690M] No 3d acceleration in Radeon X1200 with new Gallium r300 / 3d drivers in 11.04 (Needs kernel quirk)

2011-11-24 Thread Ian McMichael
Having upgraded to the 3.0.0-13-generic #22-Ubuntu kernel (without the RS690M patch) after the security release a couple of days ago, I realise that there is really no improvement on my HP Compaq 6715b whether I run Alex's patch or not. The graphics are very lagged in both Unity 3D and 2D. For

[Bug 755791] Re: [RS690M] No 3d acceleration in Radeon X1200 with new Gallium r300 / 3d drivers in 11.04

2011-11-07 Thread Ian McMichael
No, as far as I can see from the code modifications AMD made in the patches this will only fix the RS690M. In terms of installing my test kernel, I have a vanilla Oneiric i386 desktop installation and then ran dpkg -i on each of the three .deb files I created in turn. After a reboot things

[Bug 755791] Re: [RS690M] No 3d acceleration in Radeon X1200 with new Gallium r300 / 3d drivers in 11.04

2011-11-07 Thread Ian McMichael
Patches in https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37679 (posts 81 and 82) by Alex Deucher. Please report back how you get on as I'm keen to get Canonical to adopt this into the Oneiric kernel as it is a bad regression. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 874784] Re: Unity 3D too slow (Oneiric)

2011-11-04 Thread Ian McMichael
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 755791 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/755791 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 755791 [RS690M] No 3d acceleration in Radeon X1200 with new Gallium r300 / 3d drivers in 11.04 -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 755791] Re: [RS690M] No 3d acceleration in Radeon X1200 with new Gallium r300 / 3d drivers in 11.04

2011-11-04 Thread Ian McMichael
The performance of my HP Compaq 6715b with an RS690M has regressed so badly in Oneiric that I've been forced into action. Based on the work done in Bug #874784 and the patches provided by Alex Deucher in https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37679 I have built my first kernel. It builds

[Bug 755791] Re: [RS690M] No 3d acceleration in Radeon X1200 with new Gallium r300 / 3d drivers in 11.04

2011-11-04 Thread Ian McMichael
Generic headers for the above kernel ** Attachment added: linux-headers-3.0.0-13_3.0.0-13.22_all.deb https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-ati/+bug/755791/+attachment/2585692/+files/linux-headers-3.0.0-13_3.0.0-13.22_all.deb -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 755791] Re: [RS690M] No 3d acceleration in Radeon X1200 with new Gallium r300 / 3d drivers in 11.04

2011-11-04 Thread Ian McMichael
i386 headers for above kernel ** Attachment added: linux-headers-3.0.0-13-generic_3.0.0-13.22_i386.deb https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-ati/+bug/755791/+attachment/2585702/+files/linux-headers-3.0.0-13-generic_3.0.0-13.22_i386.deb ** Tags added: kernel-graphics

[Bug 874784] Re: Unity 3D too slow (Oneiric)

2011-11-02 Thread Ian McMichael
I can confirm I have tested the X-Swat PPA on an AMD Radeon X1200 in an HP Compaq 6715b and it does not fix the problem. With the PPA glxgears still struggles to make 13 FPS and the whole Unity interface lags terribly. Please see my comment above (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-

[Bug 874784] Re: Unity 3D too slow (Oneiric)

2011-11-01 Thread Ian McMichael
Could you clarify how updating nVidia dirvers solved a performance problem with an AMD Radion X1200 card? I am suffering the same issue with Oneiric on an Compaq 6715b laptop with the same graphics card. Natty Unity 3D flew. Even typing this report in Launchpad is causing a substantial lag in

[Bug 874784] Re: Unity 3D too slow (Oneiric)

2011-11-01 Thread Ian McMichael
Kernel bug with the IRQ handling in the Radeon driver. See https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37679 for the two patches that fix this. ** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #37679 http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37679 ** Package changed: unity (Ubuntu) =

[Bug 874784] Re: Unity 3D too slow (Oneiric)

2011-11-01 Thread Ian McMichael
** Tags added: kernel-graphics -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874784 Title: Unity 3D too slow (Oneiric) To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 82853] Re: Add support for the smbk5pwd overlay

2011-10-07 Thread Ian McMichael
A year has passed since this packaging issue was solved in the Debian repositories. How can we go about getting it included in the 10.04 LTS? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.

[Bug 82853] Re: Add support for the smbk5pwd overlay

2011-10-07 Thread Ian McMichael
A year has passed since this packaging issue was solved in the Debian repositories. How can we go about getting it included in the 10.04 LTS? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/82853

[Bug 787590] Re: USB power not turned off using nForce 590 SLI chipset

2011-08-02 Thread Ian McMichael
Tested and also working correctly on today's 2.6.38-11.48 proposed kernel. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/787590 Title: USB power not turned off using nForce 590 SLI chipset To

[Bug 787590] Re: USB power not turned off using nForce 590 SLI chipset

2011-07-19 Thread Ian McMichael
Thanks Julian. Following the instructions at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed I have upgraded to kernel 2.6.38-11.47, which correctly shuts the power down to USB devices at shutdown. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 787590] Re: USB power not turned off using nForce 590 SLI chipset

2011-07-13 Thread Ian McMichael
Sadly today's security update for the kernel (2.6.38-10.46) has knocked out this patch and the problem is back. Is there any chance you could build another image based on this kernel? If not, do you have a diff I can apply to the kernel package and I'll have a go at building one in my PPA? --

[Bug 787590] Re: USB power not turned off using nForce 590 SLI chipset

2011-07-13 Thread Ian McMichael
Thanks, that's certainly a work-around. It does mean that the latest set of security patches won't be in the running kernel then. Does the fact that a kernel has just been released mean the new proposed one including this patch will be built in the next day or so? -- You received this bug

[Bug 787590] Re: USB power not turned off using nForce 590 SLI chipset

2011-06-06 Thread Ian McMichael
Thanks for letting me know. Is there a way I can see when it is proposed to test it there or will you update the bug when it gets included? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/787590

[Bug 787590] Re: USB power not turned off using nForce 590 SLI chipset

2011-06-04 Thread Ian McMichael
Sorry for the delay, I have been away from my nForce 590 based machine for the last few days. I have now tested your kernel and it fixes this regression with no side-effects that I could see. USB devices are correctly powered off when the system shuts down. Does this mean we will see this in an

[Bug 787590] Re: USB power not turned off using nForce 590 SLI chipset

2011-05-25 Thread Ian McMichael
Thanks, that's excellent news and fully explains why I am not suffering difficulties with the Natty kernel. What do I need to do to get that patch included in the Natty kernel to fix this regression? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 787590] Re: USB power not turned off using nForce 590 SLI chipset

2011-05-25 Thread Ian McMichael
* not = now in the previous post. Sorry for this confusing typo! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/787590 Title: USB power not turned off using nForce 590 SLI chipset -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 787590] Re: USB power not turned off using nForce 590 SLI chipset

2011-05-25 Thread Ian McMichael
** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #35032 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35032 ** Also affects: linux via http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35032 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 787590] Re: USB power not turned off using nForce 590 SLI chipset

2011-05-25 Thread Ian McMichael
Thanks, that's good news. As a humble user (with a fair degree of hardware and development knowledge) I am not on personal terms with any members of the kernel team. I am guessing their group is subscribed to this bug? If so, could anyone assist me in getting this patch moved into pre-stable

[Bug 787590] [NEW] USB power not turned off using nForce 590 SLI chipset

2011-05-24 Thread Ian McMichael
Public bug reported: I have a Gigabyte GA-M59SLI-S5 motherboard with BIOS F9c upon which I am now running Natty (11.04). Devices like the keyboard (Microsoft Comfort Curve) and mouse (Microsoft Wheel Mouse Optical) connected to the USB bus are no longer powered off at shutdown. No hardware

[Bug 787590] Re: USB power not turned off using nForce 590 SLI chipset

2011-05-24 Thread Ian McMichael
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/787590 Title: USB power not turned off using nForce 590 SLI chipset -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 787590] Re: USB power not turned off using nForce 590 SLI chipset

2011-05-24 Thread Ian McMichael
Having dug a little deeper I have found the following kernel patch: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg35958.html Can anyone walk me through finding out if it was included in 2.6 kernel releases up until Natty? If so, I will then need to work out why it was removed for Natty and if it

[Bug 662288] Re: rt3090: freeze on module rt2800pci unload

2011-05-09 Thread Ian McMichael
Tested and confirmed working on an Acer Aspire Revo 3610 from the proposed repository with kernel 2.6.38-9.43. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/662288 Title: rt3090: freeze on module

[Bug 777394] Re: Doesn't work without php5-intl, which cannot be isntalled alongside

2011-05-09 Thread Ian McMichael
Appears to be fixed upstream in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611704. Can someone pull it over to the Ubuntu repositories? ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #611704 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611704 ** Also affects: simplepie (Debian) via

[Bug 596298] Re: impossible to install - dokuwiki and its dependencies cannot be configured

2011-05-09 Thread Ian McMichael
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 777394 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/777394 Appears to be fixed upstream in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611704. Can someone pull it over to the Ubuntu repositories? ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #611704

[Bug 777394] Re: Doesn't work without php5-intl, which cannot be isntalled alongside

2011-05-09 Thread Ian McMichael
As a temporary work-around, try the following: wget http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/simplepie/libphp-simplepie_1.2-3_all.deb sudo dpkg -i libphp-simplepie_1.2-3_all.deb sudo apt-get install dokuwiki (assuming this is the package that requires simplepie in your installation) All

[Bug 716640] Re: Shockwave Flash plugin crash

2011-02-16 Thread Ian McMichael
From Maverick (10.10) Desktop 32-bit with a GeForce 7300GT (which doesn't support VDPAU) I get the following visiting www.youtube.com and clicking on the first video link displayed: $ chromium-browser [3034:3077:1088577600:ERROR:chrome/browser/sync/engine/all_status.cc(114)] Unrecognized Syncer

[Bug 494141] Re: CUPS starts after SAMBA; printers are not available (convert cups to upstart)

2010-12-13 Thread Ian McMichael
** Attachment added: cupsd.conf https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/494141/+attachment/1764561/+files/cupsd.conf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

[Bug 494141] Re: CUPS starts after SAMBA; printers are not available (convert cups to upstart)

2010-12-13 Thread Ian McMichael
Sorry for the two posts, I couldn't work out how to attach more than one file to a comment! cupsd.conf and smb.conf as requested. IP addresses and domain names have been changed as per RFC1166 and RFC2606 respectively to protect privacy. ** Attachment added: smb.conf

[Bug 494141] Re: CUPS starts after SAMBA; printers are not available (convert cups to upstart)

2010-12-13 Thread Ian McMichael
** Attachment added: cupsd.conf https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/494141/+attachment/1764561/+files/cupsd.conf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/494141 Title:

[Bug 494141] Re: CUPS starts after SAMBA; printers are not available (convert cups to upstart)

2010-12-13 Thread Ian McMichael
Sorry for the two posts, I couldn't work out how to attach more than one file to a comment! cupsd.conf and smb.conf as requested. IP addresses and domain names have been changed as per RFC1166 and RFC2606 respectively to protect privacy. ** Attachment added: smb.conf

[Bug 653977] Re: Key missing for Extras repo - Maverick

2010-10-14 Thread Ian McMichael
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 650525 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/650525 Can be fixed by running: sudo apt-get install ubuntu-extras-keyring As far as I can tell it was only omitted from the 10.10 RC builds. The release versions seem fine in my limited experience so far. --

[Bug 580319] Re: dhcp3-server launches before upstart brings all interface, thus failing to start

2010-10-05 Thread Ian McMichael
Confirmed as still being an issue on a fresh installation of Maverick (10.10) RC AM64 server. -- dhcp3-server launches before upstart brings all interface, thus failing to start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580319 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server

[Bug 580319] Re: dhcp3-server launches before upstart brings all interface, thus failing to start

2010-10-05 Thread Ian McMichael
As another proposed workaround, I have found that editing /etc/init/rc- sysinit.conf to change the line: start on filesystem and net-device-up IFACE=lo to: start on filesystem and net-device-up IFACE=br0 also appears to produce the desired result by delaying running of legacy

[Bug 61903] Re: dhcp3 fails to start during boot-time but starts seamlessly invoking the init-script manually

2010-10-05 Thread Ian McMichael
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 580319 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580319 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 580319 dhcp3-server launches before upstart brings all interface, thus failing to start * You can subscribe to bug 580319 by following this link:

[Bug 580319] Re: dhcp3-server launches before upstart brings all interface, thus failing to start

2010-10-05 Thread Ian McMichael
Confirmed as still being an issue on a fresh installation of Maverick (10.10) RC AM64 server. -- dhcp3-server launches before upstart brings all interface, thus failing to start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580319 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 580319] Re: dhcp3-server launches before upstart brings all interface, thus failing to start

2010-10-05 Thread Ian McMichael
As another proposed workaround, I have found that editing /etc/init/rc- sysinit.conf to change the line: start on filesystem and net-device-up IFACE=lo to: start on filesystem and net-device-up IFACE=br0 also appears to produce the desired result by delaying running of legacy

[Bug 61903] Re: dhcp3 fails to start during boot-time but starts seamlessly invoking the init-script manually

2010-10-05 Thread Ian McMichael
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 580319 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580319 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 580319 dhcp3-server launches before upstart brings all interface, thus failing to start * You can subscribe to bug 580319 by following this link:

[Bug 577919] Re: chromium-browser can't open when the guest account is activated

2010-06-08 Thread Ian McMichael
It might be worth some further consideration if Chromium becomes the default browser in Maverick (10.10). However, you guessed correctly as here is the output of a ping: gu...@custard:~$ ping www.google.com ping: icmp open socket: Permission denied -- chromium-browser can't open when the guest

[Bug 577919] Re: chromium-browser can't open when the guest account is activated

2010-05-20 Thread Ian McMichael
I have also noticed this issue in guest sessions on the Lucid 32-bit Desktop installation. When attempting to run Chromium from a terminal the following output is given: gu...@custard:~$ chromium-browser Failed to move to new PID namespace: Operation not permitted The only workaround I have

[Bug 353024] Re: build zaptel against kernel 2.6.28

2009-12-15 Thread Ian McMichael
I've just pulled the zaptel package from the repositories in Jaunty and received 1:1.4.11~dfsg-3ubuntu1. This refuses to build because of the issue reported in this bug on the current 2.6.28-17-server kernel. After applying the patch from http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/*checkout

[Bug 459147] Re: Missing voice mail indicator (MWI) for SIP accounts

2009-10-24 Thread Ian McMichael
Hi Yannick, I've installed Ekiga 3.2.6~ppa~jaunty1 from your PPA as requested and re-tested. There's still no indication anywhere of voice mail. I'm still not sure where I should see it in the 3.2 code stream but it's not on the status bar (next to the signal strength indicator), in the call

[Bug 459147] Re: Missing voice mail indicator (MWI) for SIP accounts

2009-10-23 Thread Ian McMichael
** Attachment added: SIP trace of MWI on Intrepid and Jaunty http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34253496/SIP.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34253497/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt

[Bug 459147] [NEW] Missing voice mail indicator (MWI) for SIP accounts

2009-10-23 Thread Ian McMichael
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ekiga When using Ekiga 2.0.12 from Intrepid with Asterisk, an extension with new voice mail waiting shows a count of the messages waiting in the status bar at the bottom of the window. However when upgraded to Ekiga 3.2.0 on Jaunty there is no longer

[Bug 456510] [NEW] Karmic: missing Upstart script prevents GUI start-up

2009-10-20 Thread Ian McMichael
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubuntu-mid-default-settings After a clean Ubuntu MID installation from the Karmic netboot image no errors are generated but the GUI fails to start upon reboot. The script /etc/init.d/ubuntu-mid-default-settings calls the Upstart start, stop and status

[Bug 455641] Re: Karmic: ubuntu-mid depends on missing package cheese-hildon

2009-10-20 Thread Ian McMichael
@Loïc: Thanks for letting me know the status of the MID build. I wonder whether it should be removed from the list of options on the netboot image if it isn't supported in Karmic, perhaps? I'm not sure whether the xfce4-panel removal is an issue or not. As you say the

[Bug 455641] Re: Karmic: ubuntu-mid depends on missing package cheese-hildon

2009-10-20 Thread Ian McMichael
I've tested the new 1.144 package by a complete rebuild of the test machine from the netboot image. As before, the installation succeeds without error. However after the initial Ubuntu splash it again drops to a text login prompt. Logging in I find that the ubuntu-mid package is not installed

[Bug 451872] Re: e100_request_firmware fails with Karmic alternate cd (20091014.2).

2009-10-19 Thread Ian McMichael
Netboot issue confirmed fixed in http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/karmic/main/installer-i386/current/images/netboot/netboot.tar.gz version 20081029ubuntu70 dated 17th October, 2009. The network card used for the test was an embedded Intel Corporation 82557/8/9/0/1 Ethernet Pro 100 (rev 09).

[Bug 455641] [NEW] Karmic: ubuntu-mid depends on missing package cheese-hildon

2009-10-19 Thread Ian McMichael
Public bug reported: I've recently built an Ubuntu MID machine from the Karmic netboot image (http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/karmic/main/installer-i386/current/images/netboot/netboot.tar.gz) version 20081029ubuntu70. Although the installation appears to complete successfully upon reboot

[Bug 451872] Re: e100_request_firmware fails with Karmic alternate cd (20091014.2).

2009-10-16 Thread Ian McMichael
Just to check, as my original bug (#445522) was for the Karmic netboot image, that the changes made here will get rolled into that for release too? -- e100_request_firmware fails with Karmic alternate cd (20091014.2). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451872 You received this bug notification

  1   2   >