Public bug reported:
Back in bug 2055239 users saw messages like
$ sudo apt update
Warning: The unit file, source configuration file or drop-ins of
apt-news.service changed on disk. Run 'systemctl daemon-reload' to reload units.
And debugging that identified that snapd on install/update caused
Tried a live image on usb thumb drive of Fedora 40 (kernel
6.8.5-301.fc40.x86_64) as suggested by tractor556 and it works perfect.
Writing this update on the Fedore Live system on my T510 currently.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Tried today with latest kernel update of Kubuntu 24.04
(6.8.0-39-generic). Still as before. System freezes after some seconds
during login.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071523
Public bug reported:
Hi,
while updating https://ubuntu.com/server/docs/using-qemu-for-microvms (not yet
there as of writing, but soon) I found that one can run the same load rather
similar in normal and microvm mode - but RTC has issues in the latter.
Gladly testing needs almost nothing of the
Public bug reported:
I tried a release upgrade, and it didn't work. I disabled the PPAs as
requested (minetest, inkscape, libreoffice, and yt-dlp), but it still
didn't work. I tried to make sense of the log, but removing fontconfig-
config seemed to be more of a problem than a solution, so I
I'm ok to sync but can not follow up on the regression due to sprint this and
next week.
Ravi was so kind to offer that
[16:01] [013] I can follow up on migration, yes.
Thanks!
With that, I'm syncing now ...
@Ravi - please mark this closed once it is fully migrated.
--
You received this
Indeed,
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/strace/-/blob/debian/6.8-2/debian/patches/03-fix-arm-time_t-ftbfs.patch?ref_type=tags
matches
https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/strace/tree/debian/patches/fix-time_t-conversion.patch?id=7a9ca60fbf363dda49a1c4a18d31055ea736c32c
And 6.8-0ubuntu1 was
buntu)
Assignee: Christian Ehrhardt (paelzer) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: isa-support (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073895
Public bug reported:
TBD - create the MIR request
** Affects: isa-support (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Christian Ehrhardt (paelzer)
Status: Incomplete
** Tags: oracular
** Changed in: isa-support (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Christian Ehrha
Thank you Tim for continuing on this.
Thanks for all your efforts in comment #6.
I wonder how you can create a new 24.04 and trigger this while I can not.
At some point we need a third person to decide who of us has the uncommon case.
Thanks for tracking down the denial that you are seeing.
This
In John's profile, I'd recommend to replace
include if exists
with
include if exists
;-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051574
Title:
gnome-shell-portal-helper
If it's related to AppArmor, you should see some messages
(apparmor="ALLOWED" or apparmor="DENIED") about it in
/var/log/audit/audit.log, syslog or dmesg. Can you please check and
attach this log?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
hanged in: vsftpd (Ubuntu Jammy)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Christian Ehrhardt (paelzer)
** Changed in: vsftpd (Ubuntu Focal)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Christian Ehrhardt (paelzer)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscrib
We discussed this internally and agreed that we should do this, but also
that is isn't something easily done in a drive by and needs time
allocation.
Hence I filed internal SD-1762
Keeping this on the launchpad backlog for the team, but not server-todo
as we can't act immediately.
** Tags
Intersting, thanks for the feedback Tim.
Braindump out of a discussion I had on this (for suggestion to upstream).
a) Code in libvirt that does autostart knowing the guest definitions
b) systemd generator that reads guest configs, creates a
wait-libvirt-guest-config which libvirt could depend
Hi again Tim,
this is an even more interesting case - as it depends on kernel module loading
will be different between systems. It will differ in:
1. Need: only if gpu passthrough or GL rendernodes are configured this will
matter
2. Availability: systems might have more GPUs, which one do we
Thank you for your reply and I'm glad I could help by providing some
cross-checks and context.
You can try to see what allocates the huge pages (as I'm also curious now).
See
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/167451/how-to-monitor-use-of-huge-pages-per-process
this will list you
Public bug reported:
The situation with various libapache2-mod-* is unclear, due to not
having had a deep look in what seems too long. Historically the more
common 6 plus a few deps and later a few for openstack have been in
main. That is a small subset of the currently 75 libapache2-mod-* that
** Changed in: highway (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Lukas Märdian (slyon)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070807
Title:
[MIR] highway
To manage notifications about this
Public bug reported:
https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/component-mismatches-proposed.svg
shows freeradius depending on libconvert-base32-perl and libcrypt-urandom-perl
now
Evaluate the new freeradius please if we want to file MIRs for them OR if we
want to modify the dependencies.
**
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
- * when running sub-processes on login through pam_exec a process
+ * User impact: under certain conditions using pam_exec the vsftp server
+just hangs
+
+ * Reason: when running sub-processes on login through pam_exec a process
is spawned.
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
- * when running sub-processes on login through pam_exec a process
-is spawned. That can confuse vsftp if that child ends triggering SIGCHLD
but
-already been picke dup by e.g. pam_exec.so itself.
+ * when running sub-processes on login through
** Description changed:
+ [ Impact ]
+
+ * when running sub-processes on login through pam_exec a process
+is spawned. That can confuse vsftp if that child ends triggering SIGCHLD
but
+already been picke dup by e.g. pam_exec.so itself.
+
+ * The fix uses waitpid over wait to be able
Hi Tim,
you are right that neither of the workaround steps were necessary on 22.04 and
they should neither be on 24.04.
### Topic 1 - changes that should not be needed
Ubuntu 24.04 by default has
1. hugetlbfs mounted (was that no more the case for you after upgrade?)
$ mount | grep huge
I was double checking this on other releases and got the hang on focal.
I could indeed only trigger this with FTPS on focal, but AFAICS the same config
as on Oracular.
That motivated me, so I tried fresh F,J,N,O systems which in theory should all
be the same but obviously behave different.
And
Thank you for cross checking again Daniel and Adric.
Given all your support in verifying I think we are all good now.
This will stay the mandatory aging period in -proposed and then should
be good to be released fixing this for everyone.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Also did a test with a fresh Kubuntu 24.04 iso on an usb thumb drive to
exclude failure by the the existing installation (system is getting
upgraded since 18.10).
Same as before.
System starts up and freezes after some initial user activity.
Often already during language selection.
--
You
Retested today after upgrade to kernel 6.8.0-38-generic.
Same behavior as before. System is freezing after some user activity while
logging in.
Sometimes login finishes but then system freezes once there is some user
activity.
Also testest with additional kernel parameter "nomodeset" as it
Thanks Markus
#1 trying with this now:
account optionalpam_exec.so debug quiet /root/foo.sh
And
$ cat /root/foo.sh
#!/bin/bash
/bin/true
touch /tmp/brooks-was-here
/bin/true
By default vsftp is configured for the snakeoil certificate to get started
easily, but with ssl disabled.
with python 3.12
(LP: #2060649)
-- Christian Ehrhardt Thu, 11 Jul
2024 11:51:29 +0200
python-wcmatch (8.4-2) unstable; urgency=medium
[ Debian Janitor ]
root@n:~/test/python-wcmatch-8.4# pytest
=
test
** Changed in: python-wcmatch (Ubuntu Mantic)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060649
Title:
python-wcmatch not compatible to python3.12
To manage
Done: Description updated and fix uploaded
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
* The code in wcmatch uses inner details of libraries hidden in python 3.12
* That breaks several use cases like ansible-lint and many self tests
[racb] ansible-lint doesn't work at all. Calling it with
Thank you Adric and Daniel.
I'll upload this to Noble unapproved where it should hopefully be quickly
accepted given the great pre-checks. I'll use your hints to extend on the test
steps in the description ...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Hi,
first of all thanks for all the prep work.
The patch LGTM and I agree we should add it.
I was happy to see the suggestions on how to reproduce, but while writing it
out in more detail could not reproduce the hang. The following are the steps I
drafted to an SRU templates "how to test and
Public bug reported:
After a couple of days of uptime, gvfsd-smb always runs out of file
descriptors for me.
Symptoms:
* nautilus will throw a "too many open files" error when trying to access a
Samba share (even if already mounted).
* Saving files, e.g. LibreOffice, to a Samba share will fail.
** Changed in: python-wcmatch (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060649
Title:
python-wcmatch not compatible to python3.12
To
** Description changed:
+ [ Impact ]
+
+ * The code in wcmatch uses inner details of libraries hidden in python 3.12
+ * That breaks several use cases like ansible-lint and many self tests
+
+ [ Test Plan ]
+
+ 1. For the original report, run ansible-lint
+
+ 2. For a wider coverage I
MR:
https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/python-wcmatch/+git/python-wcmatch/+merge/469193
PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~paelzer/+archive/ubuntu/lp-2060649-support-python-312
** Summary changed:
- ansible-lint crashes in 24.04
+ python-wcmatch not compatible to python3.12
--
You
As reported this was just the pre python 3.12 version and not rebuilt since
April 2023.
Thereby I agree to Sorin's suggestion of this not being ansible related at all.
Running the packages self-tests would have been enough to spot this in
the first place,.
But this only had autodep8-python3
** Tags added: server-todo
** Also affects: python-wcmatch (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: python-wcmatch (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
** Changed in: python-wcmatch (Ubuntu Noble)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Christian Eh
Out of a discussion with Renan.
On the system that worked, this triggers it again as it will run apt-
cache policy.
root@n:~# pro attach C1FTFZ9LbGLJWbJdbXhT9twkhymSQ
An unexpected error occurred: 'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0xa0 in position
18: invalid start byte
For more details, see the
Interesting, the team will later have a deeper look.
But I'm confused as you can see in the following:
---
First confirming the original problem
root@n:~# locale
LANG=C.UTF-8
LANGUAGE=
LC_CTYPE="fr_FR"
LC_NUMERIC="fr_FR"
LC_TIME="fr_FR"
LC_COLLATE="fr_FR"
LC_MONETARY="fr_FR"
LC_MESSAGES="fr_FR"
Hey,
I agree, this should be equally fine to be promoted on Noble as well.
None of the critical elements are different.
Please land the addition of a matching Extra-Exclude in the noble branch
of the seeds before doing so.
** Also affects: malcontent (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Thanks!
https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/merge_requests/1268 increases the
timeout to 0.4 seconds.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062138
Title:
test-logprof.py from
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004744
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1070847
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070847
** Changed in: linuxptp (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Christian Ehrhardt (paelzer) => Ubuntu Security Team
(ubuntu-security)
--
** Changed in: linuxptp (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Christian Ehrhardt (paelzer)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071717
Title:
[MIR] linuxptp
To manage notificati
** Changed in: jpeg-xl (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ioanna Alifieraki (joalif)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070882
Title:
[MIR] jpeg-xl
To manage notifications about
** Changed in: libdisplay-info (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Lukas Märdian (slyon)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071396
Title:
[MIR] libdisplay-info
To manage
Public bug reported:
Upgrading my Thinkpad T510 from Kubuntu 23.10 to 24.10 worked fine but the
system freezes after some minmal activity with the kernel 6.8.0-36-generic.
No chance to check any log files or check for other issues. System freezes
completly.
Booting with advanced options and
FYI - Uploaded to Oracular
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064421
Title:
Merge libslirp from Debian unstable for oracular
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Forgot to update this, it is a thing of the past nowadays
** Changed in: octave (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: octave-parallel (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
MP:
https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/libslirp/+git/libslirp/+merge/468319
PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~paelzer/+archive/ubuntu/lp-2064421-merge-libslirp-4.8.0-1-oracular/+packages
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Merge Pre-Checks
There is some back and forth on the Debian side of 2029431 which is the only
Delta we effectively have.
We didn't have any negative reports and since then others chimed in and wanted
the same. I didn't dive much deeper but right now I see more arguments to keep
the delta than
Hi, a month passed since the last update.
I wanted to ask if there has been any insight into why it happened and
how it will be fixed - or if and why this might become a Won't Fix?
I'm personally OK either way but would appreciate an update what we should
expect on this case :-)
Thanks in
a checks (only nautilus itself later)
Problems: None
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1073265
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1073265
** Changed in: wsdd (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Christian Ehrhardt (paelzer) => Ubuntu Security Team
(ubuntu-security)
--
You received
Trying to take a look at this to speed it up as requested...
** Changed in: wsdd (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Christian Ehrhardt (paelzer)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
I've dropped Ubuntu-sponsors to get off the lists people check.
Once the answers (or even better updated debdiffs) have been provided please
add them back to pop up so someone can have a look again.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
State -> incomplete only as I wait for your answers - set it back to new
or confirmed once provided.
Thanks in advance!
Christian
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065856
Ti
Patch review
First of all it is not as complex as it seems, it does the very same multiple
times.
But I still found some things I need to ask.
Overall, once you had a look at those 4 points, addressed or explained
them the next sponsor coming by (or myself if I do not miss the ping due
to your
Being an upstream merged change makes it ok for Oracular,
but for the backports it is complex as it is messing with memory management and
as you said does not apply as-is.
Some comments and adaptations I'll have to make:
- thanks for having dep-3 patch headers at all, that is often forgotten
-
Hi, I come by reviewing patches that have patches to sponsor, trying to help
this going forward.
Thank you for your work and linking the related upstream discussions.
The patch is merged upstream but only in 5.0 and later.
There have been some reports that around 4.0 it was still ok.
Comparing
This all LGTM, sponsoring to jammy-unapproved
$ dput ubuntu ../thermald_2.4.9-1ubuntu0.5_source.changes
Uploading thermald using ftp to ubuntu (host: upload.ubuntu.com; directory:
/ubuntu)
running gitubuntu: Warn if uploading without git-ubuntu Vcs-* entries.
running updatemaintainer: Stop if
I had two systems, none had more than two thermal zones.
It was enough to outline the test a bit better, but not to show the good / bad
case output.
But it gave me the chance to test and install the build I had which is
all fine
$ sudo apt install ./thermald_2.4.9-1ubuntu0.5_amd64.deb
Reading
Local test build has been happy as well.
You test description is not wrong, but a bit too incomplete for what an SRU
should have.
"Check the output of thermald" could use some "how exactly" and good/bad case
examples.
I got a system in testflinger with a modern CPU hoping it would expose
this
I checked upstream git if there are any follow up fixes to the changed
code we should apply right away, there are none.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054391
Title:
Fix CPU thermal
The patch headers requested by Lucas are good as well now - thanks!
The changelog mention of the related patch is good too.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054391
Title:
Fix CPU
I double checked if we also need to fix others e.g. mantic as often -dev
releases in between are forgotten but they need to be fixed as well to avoid
upgraders regressing.
But that looks fine
git tag --contains df8ac025d22e51c237c8ebe2aa25bf672ec04edb
v2.5
v2.5.0-pre
v2.5.1
v2.5.2
v2.5.3
v2.5.4
Hi,
thanks for your update. I come by looking at the sponsoring queue and will have
a look...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054391
Title:
Fix CPU thermal sensors enumeration
To
Frode mentioned he will aim at doing the OVS upload in the next pulse.
To track that I've opened bug 2069991 for him, which allows us to track
it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067480
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
This release sports mostly bug-fixes and we would like to make sure all of our
supported customers have access to these improvements. Among other things this
also fixes a test issue with newer DPDK which will unblock providing the
backport
of that stable release.
FYI - I can't set/triage the UCA task to set the actual release these
goes to
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069991
Title:
[SRU] openvswitch 3.3.1 point release
To manage
The issue in openvswitch tests with the new release has been fixed (Only Noble
onwards).
See: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/+bug/2067889
You might coordinate with Frode if/when that will land in OVS in Noble.
That might be full 3.3.1 (if that is what they planned) or just
I've put a reminder to bug 2068019 and we are happy to wait for this new upload
to unblock this.
But since we know what it actually waits for it makes no sense to show up in
the bug housekeeping weekly - dropping the server-todo tag.
** Tags removed: server-todo
--
You received this bug
Once this new version is ready Miriam will also include the fix for bug 2063046
in the upload.
Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068019
Title:
Upgrade to v2.11.1.4 on Oracular
** Changed in: ssl-cert (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Sergio Durigan Junior (sergiodj)
** Tags added: bitesize
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069330
Title:
make-ssl-cert:
** Changed in: net-snmp (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Athos Ribeiro (athos-ribeiro)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/720638
Title:
snmpd crashes with segfault
Thank you that satisfies the test case, a few more day of maturing.
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-noble
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-noble
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
FYI: Uploaded by Lucas but atm stuck in proposed for networking issues
in the test
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065423
Title:
Update AppArmor template to allow confined runc to
That is awesome, thanks Vincent.
We will pick it up in the subsequent merge of chrony then.
** Tags removed: server-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068526
Title:
apparmor
Sadly the backport seems to be complex per Andreas evaluation.
It is fixed in Noble onwards and the symptom is "only" false positive
notifications.
As-is this seems not to be feasible effort to fix it in Jammy and before.
If someone has a great approach to tackle this more easily we are open to
There are several places in test-logprof.py with a 0.3s timeout. Can you
please show the detailed error message to make it clear where we need a
longer timeout?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1071456
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071456
** Changed in: autopkgtest (Debian)
Status: Fix Committed => Unknown
** Changed in: autopkgtest (Debian)
Remote watch: Debian Bug tracker #1068363 => Debian Bug tracker #1071456
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056461
Title:
autopkgtest-virt-qemu on noble images sometimes hangs doing copydown
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Tags removed: server-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045297
Title:
file root.hints needs update
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Fully complete in Oracular now and DPDK/OVS migrated together
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/23.11.1-1
@Frode - will you prepare an OVS 3.3.1 for Noble so we can do the DPDK
stable update afterwards?
** Also affects: openvswitch (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status:
ermissison.
The only drawback is that therefore the attack severity (if there is one)
is higher.
Gladly for the most likely attack surface (manipulated profile data) there
is no elevated permission needed (that is only for profiling)
** Changed in: sysprof (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Christia
Sorry it took so long from the assignment last week, finally started on this
MIR review.
If I can't complete I'd at least leave you what I found until then so you can
act on these.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
New OVS is in Oracular
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/3.3.1-1
Some tests already were happy in old runs, ppc64 and arm64 have not run the way
they need to.
I've triggered them with the new DPDK and the new OVS together.
Unless some other, formerly masked, test issue affects
We found a different solution that fixes even more.
Included as:
commit cc99622485062b902362ffa3a08317dc0f926164
Author: David Marchand
Date: Thu Jun 6 15:11:11 2024 +0200
system-dpdk: Fix socket conflict when starting testpmd.
Which is in upstream stable update v3.3.1
Frode will as
oops same issue in 3.4.2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059953
Title:
MAAS machine commissioning fails in "20-dhcp-unconfigured-ifaces "
To manage notifications about this bug go
I have the exact same issue with 3.6 but only when commissioning with
24.04 (noble).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059953
Title:
MAAS machine commissioning fails in
Submitted for upstream discussion:
https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2024-June/414484.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067889
Title:
DPDK 23.11.1 / OVS 3.3.0 cause
Thanks to m4 expansion I had to change it in tests/system-dpdk-testsuite for
retesting.
The real fix would be in ./tests/system-dpdk-macros.at though.
Adding the following to the rules made it work:
/TELEMETRY: Socket write base info to client failed/d
Now the questions is "is this a warning
With what I know from comment #14 and comment #5 I tried to get deeper
to finally find what actually goes wrong which still eludes me :-/
Env vars that we need:
OVS_RUNDIR=/var/run/openvswitch/
abs_top_srcdir=../_debian/openvswitch/
1. db creation + starting ovsdb with --detach in background +
I checked with my peers and it seems this happens indeed to almost
everyone. The only exceptions are thos that diabled the assistant or not
using gnome in the first place.
@Jorrit
I agree, the folks I checked had various other GPUs - all affected AFAICS.
@Jon
Just like you I usually use just
** Changed in: libdex (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Lukas Märdian (slyon)
** Changed in: libdex (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Lukas Märdian (slyon) => Ioanna Alifieraki (joalif)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: libpanel (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ioanna Alifieraki (joalif)
** Changed in: libpanel (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Ioanna Alifieraki (joalif) => Lukas Märdian (slyon)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
** Changed in: sysprof (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Christian Ehrhardt (paelzer)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066269
Title:
[MIR] sysprof
To manage notificati
Here the differences I spot on a high level:
4. OVS-DPDK - ping vhost-user ports
- testpmd.log - not much difference
- ovsdb-server.log
ovsdb-server is killed (sig 15) in the bad case 7 seconds after starting
that kill is after the test log ends, so it could be cleanup
- ovs-vswitchd.log
** Attachment added: "Test results on 23.11.1"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/+bug/2067889/+attachment/5785828/+files/bad-case.tgz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
1 - 100 of 24031 matches
Mail list logo
