I sent two messages, one with and one without attachments. I wasn't sure
which one was going to get through.
The titles are only rough ideas. What is more important (to me) is that we
have coverage in all the separate areas. This way, we can ensure each area
gets the attention it deserves and
Thank you for the vote of confidence!
My recommendation is to base a quorum on attendance levels. I would use
tommorrow's attendance level as a baseline and then establish that 66% or
greater of that number are needed for votes at the next meeting.
In the event of appointing a Core Marketing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Vilsack wrote:
Thank you for the vote of confidence!
My recommendation is to base a quorum on attendance levels. I would use
tommorrow's attendance level as a baseline and then establish that 66% or
greater of that number are needed for
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 10:48 PM, John Vilsack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for the vote of confidence!
My recommendation is to base a quorum on attendance levels. I would use
tommorrow's attendance level as a baseline and then establish that 66% or
greater of that number are needed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan Trevino wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 10:48 PM, John Vilsack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for the vote of confidence!
My recommendation is to base a quorum on attendance levels. I would use
tommorrow's attendance level as a baseline
Nice work John :)
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 2:58 AM, John Vilsack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dg523cct_41d8t388r5
hmm...your mail didnt have any attachment (atleast i didnt get any)
and the document does not allow me to save it so that i can read it
later.
Since the
