Hey John,
Your email was very positive and I liked the tone, but...
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 11:06 -0600, John Vilsack wrote:
> DRM as a concept is not inherently bad. Its simply poor
> implementations we've seen up to this point and how its been co-opted
> by media conglomerates that force us as a
Nope, i was in a rush-- it was a bad example, but the other one i provided
should make more sense. Besides, let's not get side-tracked.
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 02:33, M. Fioretti wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 19:21:51 PM -0500, Danny Piccirillo (
> danny.picciri...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
>
> > I pro
> are you sure this example of yours makes sense? I mean, are you saying
> that DRM happens because proprietary software exists? I am not sure I
> follow you here.
> Marco
Not to mention a blanket-statement like this is FUD that the Internet
slams corporations for.
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 19:21:51 PM -0500, Danny Piccirillo
(danny.picciri...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
> I propose that we put together a solid list of Free Software (Open
> Source) promises that people can expect from FOSS tools. That is, a
> list of things that would never happen with FOSS with examples
Spreading the ideals of FOSS is a bit difficult when we have to explain how
our tools respect freedom and why peer-review and our methods create better
software. I propose that we put together a solid list of Free Software (Open
Source) promises that people can expect from FOSS tools. That is, a li
