Failures packaging Psb gfx driver / libdrm

2008-01-04 Thread Bryce Harrington
I attempted to get the Psb driver updated to the latest from moblin.org, but without success. The way these packages are put together, it is very difficult to port the changes to Ubuntu. The principle problem is libdrm. The changes required for -psb are packages as a patch, however it fails to a

Re: Moblin Kernel and Driver Status for WW51

2008-01-04 Thread Tobin Davis
While the cameras in the Q1 are currently not supported, they may get support in the future. The ubuntu-mobile image is not just geared towards Menlow devices (otherwise they wouldn't need two kernels). And I'm sure if someone sent the gspca developer some hardware dump info, he'd whip out a patc

Re: Moblin Kernel and Driver Status for WW51

2008-01-04 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 04:52:14PM +0800, Du, Alek wrote: > Amit, > As we talked, let's sync up with the patches, and here is the patch list > gspca_camera.dpatch Hm. What's this being carried for? My understanding was that the Q1 devices weren't supported by gspca, and the Menlow hardware would

RE: Moblin Kernel and Driver Status for WW51

2008-01-04 Thread Du, Alek
Amit, As we talked, let's sync up with the patches, and here is the patch list gspca_camera.dpatch hda_sigmatel.dpatch marvell_8686_8688.dpatch poulsbo_hda_class_id.dpatch poulsbo_hda.dpatch poulsbo_ide.dpatch poulsbo_pci_ids.dpatch poulsbo_smbus.dpatch poulsbo_USBC.dpatch sdio_crown_beach.dpatch s

RE: Moblin Kernel and Driver Status for WW51

2008-01-04 Thread Du, Alek
Amit, As I compared my patches with yours, I could almost say all the patches are functional identical. Patches we have tested are hda audio, libata, USBC and SDIO part. The thermal patches and sigmatel patch have no changes to test them. More detail we could talk over IRC. Thanks, Alek -O

Re: Moblin Kernel and Driver Status for WW51

2008-01-04 Thread Amit Kucheria
Hi Rob, On 12/20/07, Rhoads, Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2.6.24 Kernel Support > = > Alek continues to port the patches from 2.6.22 to 2.6.24. He is > using/referencing the work previously done by Amit. Could you provide details as to what parts have been useful and what