Re: Question about supported hardware/processor

That's excellent, thanks. Please feel free to link to your site from that wiki page, especially where relevant technical specifications are available. On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 06:41:53PM +0200, Steve Paine wrote: > I've added all the devices I know about to the > Wiki.

Re: Question about supported hardware/processor

I've added all the devices I know about to the Wiki. All specs are listed herewith links to more specs, images, news, etc etc etc. http://www.ump

Re: Question about supported hardware/processor

On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 11:55:29PM +0300, Michael Dominic K. wrote: > Makes perfect sense. BTW, are you planning to investigate/use > hildon-widgets (hildon-1 library) too? What's the preferred method of > developing applications for your platform? > > Anyways, coming back to my original question -

Re: Question about supported hardware/processor

On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 12:11:36AM +0200, Steve Paine wrote: > Allow me to get a few things off my chest please. (and tell me to stop > if its not required in this forum. I won't take offense.) > > The current definition of 'platform' (from the Wiki) is: > - There are some Intel-based systems on

Re: Question about supported hardware/processor

Good idea. I was updating https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MobileAndEmbedded a bit today to add information about devices people can use UME with, and added the Q1 Ultra as the primary example I'm aware of. Please feel free to turn that into a hyperlink and add more details about the platform. Also, if t

Re: Question about supported hardware/processor

On 6/22/07, Rusty Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 15:07 -0700, James Sparenberg wrote: > > On Wednesday 20 June 2007 11:26:05 Mathias Uebelacker wrote: > > > wiki.ubuntu ist a good place but whats with a good structure? > > > > > Just trying to understand the goals of the

Re: Question about supported hardware/processor

On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 15:07 -0700, James Sparenberg wrote: > On Wednesday 20 June 2007 11:26:05 Mathias Uebelacker wrote: > > wiki.ubuntu ist a good place but whats with a good structure? > > Just trying to understand the goals of the project. The Q1 would run regular > Ubuntu just fine. (Xubu

Re: Question about supported hardware/processor

On Wednesday 20 June 2007 11:26:05 Mathias Uebelacker wrote: > wiki.ubuntu ist a good place but whats with a good structure? > > > ubuntu-mobile > I > I-Samsung Q1 ultra---I > I > Igraphics > I

Re: Question about supported hardware/processor

On Wednesday 20 June 2007 09:51:12 Kevin Fries wrote: > On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 09:39 -0700, Ronald Stewart wrote: > > I would be shocked and surprised if this goes down the path of ARM. > > ARE YOU KIDDING ME! > > How can you consider building a mobile/embedded platform and ignore ARM? > Just becaus