Hello Kubuntu fans,
With a bit over a month left until Feisty is released, it's a great
time to sort out bugs and polish up the desktop. We are having a week
of bug triaging focusing on Kubuntu Desktop applications, inspired by
a similar effort by the Ubuntu Desktop Team. Every day the week of
Mo
Firstly, sorry I'm not replying directly to the thread, I was not subscribed
to the list...
> Actually, FFmpeg can also decode "DivX 3.11 ;-)" videos that have been
> encoded by a hacked version of Microsoft pre-standard MPEG4 codec, which
> is _not_ (100% identical to) "MPEG-4 ASP video". This
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
john levin wrote:
> I recall that there were plans for Ubuntu having a 'Sid'; an unstable
> version precisely for this sort of situation. (Wasn't it going to be
> called Grumpy?) Has anything come of this, or has the idea been dropped?
I believe the
On vr, 2007-03-09 at 08:02 +0100, Jakub Misak wrote:
> There's incorrect description displayed for the gstreamer-ffmpeg package
> (FFmpeg plugin for GSstreamer). It says it can be used for encoding/decoding
> the DivX format (or even "play divx"). This is wrong, and in case you don't
> know why
http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=4557
--
Rich Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Key: 0x2E2C0124
pgpREU55jXd4A.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-announce&m=117346514411140&w=2
This was just announced a few minutes ago. I am in the process of building the
current package now.
--
Rich Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Key: 0x2E2C0124
pgpZCbfOQJ5tI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 11:10:40AM +, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> If Jeremie Corbier is reading, please reply to this thread if you have
> a point to make and please do not flame me in your blog. There is a
> reason we have mailing lists and IRC, blogs are not a replacement.
>
> Having KDE 4 pa
Hello everybody,
I'm very very very happy with how the Universe Hug Day goes from now.
We have quite some fodder for MOTU hopefuls now:
* Bugs marked as 'packaging': http://tinyurl.com/368977
* Bugs marked as 'bitesize': http://tinyurl.com/2us2se
Some other observations:
* ther
Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 12:41:32PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>
>> I understand that you all like to have always the latest stuff in the
>> archive, espc. when it's doesn't affect any existing installations
>> and/or packages. However I feel that it would help the
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 12:41:32PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> I summarise the request from my POV with arguments that count to me,
> please correct me if I got something wrong:
>
> * the KDE4 packages don't affect any existing KDE3 installation from
> ubuntu main
> * the KDE4 package
Hello,
some more comments about upgrades in general and the backport request
process.
I hope it is clear for the Ubuntu development team that the existing SRU
policy fails to meet the majority of desktop users expectations regarding
application upgrades. You can confirm that by looking into the f
Jonathan Riddell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The Kubuntu Council have decided to treat KDE 4 and related packages
> with a general upstream version freeze exception, pending any
> objections from MOTU Council. This includes other pre-release
> software such as decibel and strigi that is not use
Jonathan Riddell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If Jeremie Corbier is reading, please reply to this thread if you have
> a point to make and please do not flame me in your blog. There is a
> reason we have mailing lists and IRC, blogs are not a replacement.
Sure thing. I feel quite similar like J
If Jeremie Corbier is reading, please reply to this thread if you have
a point to make and please do not flame me in your blog. There is a
reason we have mailing lists and IRC, blogs are not a replacement.
Having KDE 4 packages is a good idea because it helps people see the
current state of KDE
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 01:37:37AM +0100, Stefan Potyra wrote:
> On Friday 09 March 2007 01:20:24 Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 01:02:04AM +0100, Stefan Potyra wrote:
> > > Do I get it right that you ask for an UVF exception for NEW packages
> > > (rather than for updates)?
>
Hi all,
This is going to be a long email, so bear with me. :)
Thanks very much for discussing the different issues about the MOTU
community in your last meeting. I had a look over them, and looked at
some of the things we can do to improve the community, and I would like
to offer some advice for
First of all, thanks for your pointers, help and especially patience
with this newbie.
I went along with something easy at first (Bug LP#88232: Package
description is very out of date) :-)
I changed the short description and long description in 'control' as
follows:
The award-winning Web browser f
17 matches
Mail list logo
