Moins,
On Sun, 18 May 2008 20:22:25 +0200
Reinhard Tartler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephan Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why not moving away from this LP thingy for merges?
We could use something like the RT for those tasks?
Do you think about rt.canonical.com?
Definitly not...
Scott Kitterman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This would help with preventing duplicate work, but I do see how that
would address my concern about having to wait to get a bug number?
What would you need the bug number for? The only reason I see is to add
a propoer comment in debian/changelog.
Per definition, the assignee of a malone bugtask is the one working on
the merge. It would be very useful if DaD was taught about these merge
bugs and reproduce that piece of information.
Currently if you enter Bug #nn as a comment in DaD it knows that's a
bug number and adds a link to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Scott Kitterman schrieb:
Does Launchpad/python-launchpad expose an interface for this? With email
reported bugs you have to wait for LP to get around to mailing you the bug
number.
import launchpadbugs.connector
Bug =
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 03:24:29AM -0400, Miguel Angel Ruiz Manzano wrote :
Albin Tonnerre wrote:
Not really. The package was native when we started to diverge from debian.
It
has later become non-native in debian, and causes the very same problem
since
then, ie you just can't use
