Luca Falavigna wrote:
Emmet Hikory ha scritto:
Consequently, there is now an opening on the team, and volunteers
are needed to help with the work.
I'd like to volunteer for the role.
I'm happy to welcome Luca to the Universe Sponsors Admin team.
Luca has been one of the primary
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008, either Michael Bienia or Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Perhaps it was not so well communicated in the past else there wouldn't
be the confusion leading to that mail. At that time I thought that one
had to be a MOTU before one could apply for core-dev.
According to the diagram
Dustin Kirkland wrote:
According to the diagram shown here:
* https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopers
there is a dotted line between a Prospective Developer and a Core
Developer, and a note that this an exceptional case. The more common
case is for MOTU to apply for Core Developer
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 00:58:40 +0900 Emmet Hikory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dustin Kirkland wrote:
According to the diagram shown here:
* https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopers
there is a dotted line between a Prospective Developer and a Core
Developer, and a note that this an exceptional
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 9:25 AM, Steve Langasek
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 11:31:27PM -0700, Jordan Mantha wrote:
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 9:49 PM, Nicolas Valcarcel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently there is no policy about how to make changes in the
Michael Bienia [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This leads me to the question: what the main point on becoming a MOTU?
- is it the next reward for Ubuntu members who work hard on improving
Ubuntu (development)? They have good technicals skills and we trust
them enough to make them MOTUs (and
With the Intrepid Feature Freeze deadline fast approaching (August
28th) I thought I'd put out another call for help reviewing the
Phusion Passenger package and alterations to the Rubygems package.
Without your help reviewing the code, this will not go into Intrepid
and Ubuntu will be short of
Jordan Mantha [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also i will suggest to the revu reviewers to ask the
packagers to add a patch system on their packages.
What did you think about it? Any comments?
I think our job as downstreams is to provide patches to Debian, not
tell them how to maintain
On Tuesday 19 August 2008 15:11, Neil Wilson wrote:
Rubygems contains 'gem' - the Ruby Package manager. Ruby on Rails is a
gem based framework and is completely integrated with the gem package
manager. In Intrepid I would expect users to continue to use gem to
install Rails and for that to be
On 2008-08-19 20:51:20 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Michael Bienia [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This leads me to the question: what the main point on becoming a MOTU?
- is it the next reward for Ubuntu members who work hard on improving
Ubuntu (development)? They have good technicals
Reinhard Tartler wrote:
I think our job as downstreams is to provide patches to Debian, not
tell them how to maintain their packages.
Excatly.
Please note that adding a patch system to a package that previously
didn't adds additional noise in the debdiff. So please, don't.
(well,
ti, 2008-08-19 kello 16:34 -0400, Phillip Susi kirjoitti:
I have to disagree. If you are applying patches you must use a patch
system to comply with the debian packaging guidelines ( otherwise you
modify the .orig.tar.gz and you shouldn't be doing that ).
That's not actually correct. The
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Michael Bienia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008-08-19 20:51:20 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Michael Bienia [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
snip
Or to put it an other way: what makes a person a MOTU?
- is it the membership in the ~motu team (and it's a coincidence
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 03:15:15PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Tuesday 19 August 2008 15:11, Neil Wilson wrote:
Rubygems contains 'gem' - the Ruby Package manager. Ruby on Rails is a
gem based framework and is completely integrated with the gem package
manager. In Intrepid I would
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:57:29 -0700 Jordan Mantha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Michael Bienia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 2008-08-19 20:51:20 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Michael Bienia [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
snip
Or to put it an other way: what makes a
On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 16:34 -0400, Phillip Susi wrote:
I have to disagree. If you are applying patches you must use a patch
system to comply with the debian packaging guidelines ( otherwise you
modify the .orig.tar.gz and you shouldn't be doing that ).
Where did this meme turn up? As Lars
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:01:26 -0700 Mathias Gug [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 03:15:15PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Tuesday 19 August 2008 15:11, Neil Wilson wrote:
Rubygems contains 'gem' - the Ruby Package manager. Ruby on Rails is a
gem based framework and is
On Tuesday 19 August 2008 16:41, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
ti, 2008-08-19 kello 16:34 -0400, Phillip Susi kirjoitti:
I have to disagree. If you are applying patches you must use a patch
system to comply with the debian packaging guidelines ( otherwise you
modify the .orig.tar.gz and you
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 05:58:39PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:01:26 -0700 Mathias Gug [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 03:15:15PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Tuesday 19 August 2008 15:11, Neil Wilson wrote:
Rubygems contains 'gem' - the
Hi Michael,
Sorry for the late reply, I just saw your message...
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 09:34:44AM +0200, Michael Bienia wrote:
There are a couple of hitches, though. We dual-license Resin as GPL
and a closed source professional (upsell) version with a bit of extra
code for added
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:46:34 -0700 Mathias Gug [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 05:58:39PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:01:26 -0700 Mathias Gug [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
...
The make a parallel with python, the gem command is similar to
easy_install.
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 07:28:02PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 05:58:39PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Which we generally patch into submission when we find it. In
Debian/Ubuntu
if ezsetup is installing external Python modules it's bug.
Do you mean that
On Tuesday 19 August 2008 19:56, Mathias Gug wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 07:28:02PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 05:58:39PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
...
Neil's proposal is to improve the gem command (from the libgems-ruby
package) so that binaries are
Scott Kitterman wrote:
For a legalistic reading of policy, I think there is nothing wrong with that,
but how is a typical user of a gem going to know that if they install gem X a
library used by gem Y, Z, and package A will be replaced/overridden? As a
practical matter I think this declares
24 matches
Mail list logo
